obvert -> RE: Japanese ASW not toned down in stock? (11/18/2016 9:36:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Alpha77 quote:
ORIGINAL: obvert So here is a screenshot from one of my games. I'm guessing Scen 30 judging by the top here, but does scenario matter, even? This makes me think 41 > 43 is an advantageous upgrade. Am I missing something? (I get that there may be fewer total squads, but this upgrade for anti-armor seems good enough to make the unit better and of course the engineers, arty, tanks and other stuff would also upgrade too depending on division type. And ofc in the mods, scens most play - the 43 inf is a better unit, but not in stock [:(] I've noticed from playing that a 43 upgraded division is a better unit. That has not been tested outside of a PBEM, but they do hold fast in good terrain better than a 41 division. Once again, I play STOCK scen2. You play scen 30 (which obviously is not stock), it seems you have the values from DaBabes mod. I played this one before vs. the AI and this has indeed the better AT values. Also mot. squads are a bit better. You also get heavy squads which get the better AT, you do not have any heavy squads at all in stock. See that is what I meant with mods,betas,fixes...confusion [:)] So which fix for STOCK, would tone down my "super-E"? I would be fine with that it seems overboard. But has this same fix then also the better squads ? I happily trade better AT value (even if not much) for more "realistic" ASW on some Es late in the war [;)] But the FLAK seems already deadly enough at least the Allied ones. With this fix the FLAK will get even more severe (as people report above)?? I was thinking it may be overboard then esp. vs. planes over 10k. Also this super E issue was talked about on here for a longer while (even 3 years ago or so) but was not fixed in the last OFFICIAL patch ? So the "officials" aka devs must have some reason to leave it as is in stock... If you'll notice above in this thread the game in question is a scene 1 game stock. This screenshot is from a different game with GreyJoy earlier. It is DBB. Can you post the number of these units from the database in your game setup? I'm not sure why a "fix" was not added to game, but as you know, this has been an ongoing process of addressing issues via the betas. If you look at the data above and notice that these boats were not effective in the war even with their 12 DCs you'll understand why a fix would be preferable.
|
|
|
|