RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message


Orm -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/28/2017 4:25:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DRF99

This YouTube video shows a gunner turning a crank to actually launch the bomblets. No doubt after getting the fire command.

Nice. [:)]

Thank you for sharing. [&o]




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 2:50:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

Actually England has a place of fondness in my heart , and my spouse's family. Her Uncle , MM3 Oland Paradis was aboard USS LST 342 off Tulagi when RO-106 torpedoed her. England got her.


The Wiki on her last sub kill is amusing-as much as such things can be 'amusing'. You can get a sense of the frustration of the other ASW ships as they send her in and she immediately scores:

RO-105

The three destroyer escorts reached Manus at 1500 on 27 May. After taking on fuel, provisions, and ammunition, they sailed at 1800 28 May with Spangler (DE-696) to rejoin the search. Hazelwood detected RO-105 on RADAR at 0156 on 30 May and missed with a depth charge attack. George and Raby joined Hazelwood and made sixteen Hedgehog and depth charge attacks over a period of 25 hours. RO-105 came up for air at 0310 on 31 May and was immediately detected by George and Raby. RO-105 stayed directly between the two destroyer escorts for five minutes before submerging so neither Raby nor George could fire without endangering the other. Sequential Hedgehog attacks were then made by Raby, George, Raby, and Spangler. All missed. Division Commander Hains then radioed, "Oh, hell. Go ahead, England." [6] England then scored six to ten detonations in a Hedgehog attack at 0736. A major explosion followed at 0741 and a fountain of oil and debris appeared on the surface.[7]

This anti-submarine warfare performance was never matched in World War II, and won for England a Presidential Unit Citation, and the assurance from the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral E. J. King, "There'll always be an England in the United States Navy." His pledge was fulfilled on 6 October 1960, when DLG-22 was assigned the name England.




My guess is that England had a really good SONAR man at work. To get that degree of accuracy with old style active SONAR is hard. To get it accurate as to be able to score 1st try , especially in "blue-out" conditions (the water really screwed up by previous depth charge attacks) is to say the least , impressive. This sounds like a very talented skipper , actually listening to an equally talented SONAR man. [&o][&o][&o][:)]


Who was actually the one to 'pull the trigger' on the Hedgehog in these cases? He/they need to be taken into consideration as well. The SONAR operator wasn't the one, was he? I also doubt the Captain would order the firing per se. Isn't there another link in the chain that's overlooked?

I don't know for certain , but generally the SONAR operator gave the info, the skipper made the call and someone else would "press the button" , maybe a gunners mate , maybe a junior officer (as portrayed in "The Bedford Incident"). Unless of course there was a senior officer aboard[:D].


I guess what I meant was that there are moving parts between the sonar operator identifying contact and pinpointing the range and the destruction of the submarine by Hedgehog fire.

Who would identify inflexion or bearing to target? Would SONAR call out recommended course corrections? What about adjusting speed so as to get the right spread on target when the appropriate range is called out? Is this targetting charted in a CIC or some such on board? Is there a central control of fire direction like there is for the guns, or are hedgehogs 'locally operated' only? Are the Hedgehog launchers fixed in place or can they be rotated for angled fire like a turret?




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 2:54:27 PM)

Anyways, here's today's plane du jour:



[image]local://upfiles/6968/85EA78C8AADE4AF3B842AD950D982AC3.jpg[/image]




adarbrauner -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 2:58:15 PM)

Dornier Grief

don't rember by memory the number.

22.?
23?
3??





adarbrauner -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 2:59:50 PM)

This is the training version- of course




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:00:29 PM)

DO-335 A-6 Arrow.




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:01:25 PM)

Dornier Do335A6 pfeil ( two seat night fighter/trainer )/(Dornier Do 335 V-11)




adarbrauner -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:02:27 PM)

Well I cheked, not Grief, another name[:'(]




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:03:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

DO-335 A-6 Arrow.

Aye.





Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:04:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

Dornier Do335A6 pfeil ( two seat night fighter/trainer )/(Dornier Do 335 V-11)


Yes. That's what Steve said too. One minute and four seconds before you. [:'(]




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:05:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: adarbrauner

Well I cheked, not Grief, another name[:'(]


Yes. It was another name. A Do-335 A-6. Like AW-1 Steve and MakeeLearn said. [;)]




adarbrauner -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:05:40 PM)

Heavy fighter- night fighter.

Possibly the fastes piston airplane at the time.




Cap Mandrake -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:12:47 PM)

Not particularly attractive. Seems like a "drag" queen to me.




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 3:21:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Cap Mandrake

Not particularly attractive. Seems like a "drag" queen to me.


With a push/pull prop system, she can go 'either way' if you know what I mean.




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:33:23 PM)

My turn. Tell me the type and nation of the background airplane. For bonus points the ID of the plane in the foreground. EXTRA bonus. What squadron does the foreground plane belong to. Designation and "nick name". Good luck! [:D]

[image]local://upfiles/24345/5029ED7F653F41AEA029CF7F01C2D4F7.jpg[/image]




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:41:07 PM)

quote:

My turn. Tell me the type and nation of the background airplane.


Arado Ar 234, Germany




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:41:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
For bonus points the ID of the plane in the foreground.


Like it says on the tail, it's number 112. [:'(]

Duh...[:D]




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:44:37 PM)

The forum software is more wonky than when I last uploaded. Oh well, 7th times the charm! [8|][:D]




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:46:35 PM)

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:51:37 PM)

foreground P-8 Poseidon




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:55:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian


Close but wrong. AT sometime in it's life it MIGHT have been a TU-95 , although It more likely was new construction. It has a new designation , and I'll accept either the NATO number or Russian. Here's a hint. IN theory NATO should have RENAMED it something in the "M" serious as in Madge , Mainstay and Mail. But when it came out NATO didn't know if it was still a MULTI-purpose aircraft , one of those purposes being a bomber.




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:56:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

foreground P-8 Poseidon

DIE YOU GRAVY-SUCKING PIG!!!!!!!![:D] WRONG , WRONG , WRONG! Go stand in the corner! [:-][:D]




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:57:03 PM)

P-3 VP-45




Chickenboy -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 4:57:46 PM)

Foreground plane P-3C update II from VP-45, aka "Pelicans". Probably something from their days in NAS Keflavik.

ETA: [:'(]




Shark7 -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:00:34 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian


Close but wrong. AT sometime in it's life it MIGHT have been a TU-95 , although It more likely was new construction. It has a new designation , and I'll accept either the NATO number or Russian. Here's a hint. IN theory NATO should have RENAMED it something in the "M" serious as in Madge , Mainstay and Mail. But when it came out NATO didn't know if it was still a MULTI-purpose aircraft , one of those purposes being a bomber.


Tu-142M Bear F




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:05:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

P-3 VP-45

ALMOST! [:D]




MakeeLearn -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:06:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Shark7


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian


Close but wrong. AT sometime in it's life it MIGHT have been a TU-95 , although It more likely was new construction. It has a new designation , and I'll accept either the NATO number or Russian. Here's a hint. IN theory NATO should have RENAMED it something in the "M" serious as in Madge , Mainstay and Mail. But when it came out NATO didn't know if it was still a MULTI-purpose aircraft , one of those purposes being a bomber.


Tu-142M Bear F



Yea that tail looks like it, i get the two confused Tu-95/Tu-142




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:08:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Foreground plane P-3C update II from VP-45, aka "Pelicans". Probably something from their days in NAS Keflavik.

ETA: [:'(]

Correct, but usually P-3's only wear the US flag if they are a VIP transport bird (VP-3a). There was never a VP-3C. The other time they wear the flag is when on UNITAS. I'm guessing the latter. The Bera was probably enroute to Cuba.




AW1Steve -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:09:27 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Shark7


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian


Close but wrong. AT sometime in it's life it MIGHT have been a TU-95 , although It more likely was new construction. It has a new designation , and I'll accept either the NATO number or Russian. Here's a hint. IN theory NATO should have RENAMED it something in the "M" serious as in Madge , Mainstay and Mail. But when it came out NATO didn't know if it was still a MULTI-purpose aircraft , one of those purposes being a bomber.


Tu-142M Bear F

Correct! Can anyone tell me what a "Bear F' is used for? Compared with say the TU-95 or TU-142H ? [&:]




Shark7 -> RE: OT: Name that plane / ship (6/29/2017 5:11:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: Shark7


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve


quote:

ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn

background airplane Tupolev Tu-95 Russian


Close but wrong. AT sometime in it's life it MIGHT have been a TU-95 , although It more likely was new construction. It has a new designation , and I'll accept either the NATO number or Russian. Here's a hint. IN theory NATO should have RENAMED it something in the "M" serious as in Madge , Mainstay and Mail. But when it came out NATO didn't know if it was still a MULTI-purpose aircraft , one of those purposes being a bomber.


Tu-142M Bear F

Correct! Can anyone tell me what a "Bear F' is used for? Compared with say the TU-95 or TU-142H ? [&:]


Its the Maritime recon/ASW version.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.71875