RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message

Whicker -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/25/2019 3:48:52 AM)

I was doing `Air force moral' I think, didn't really notice anything, but that choice made sense to me. I don't think I ever saw a sub but I never played it all the way thru, will give it another go eventually.



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/28/2019 1:42:20 AM)

OK here is Ver 1.6

Quite a few fixes and adjustments. The big ones:
-Ammo will now be delivered to Bulgarian Air Bases for some Soviet fighters starting about noon on day 2
-I think I've got the carrier strike fixed, should prove interesting
-TLAM strike should also be fixed
-Bulgarian Airborne & Ampib Bns are available to use as cargo
-The ekranoplans objective is moved and should be in range
-Cargo bits are fixed and fuel issues are in the brief

and a bunch of other bits fixed up.

I look forward to your comments and critiques.

Enjoy



morphin -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/28/2019 6:20:54 PM)

Thank0s

There are 2 Naval Docks at Atia, one has 5xVydra LCU, but on these we can not laod cargo because on this dock there is no cargo....

Maybe change this 5 boats with other boats that doesn0t need cargo load?

Andy



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/28/2019 6:25:24 PM)

Are you loading from the group view or did you select the individual dock? It should work as they are in a group.

Will fix otherwise.

B



morphin -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/28/2019 6:32:38 PM)

From the group view...



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/2/2019 1:16:24 PM)

OK that bit is fixed - bit of a PITA, the 5 LCUs take up the same space as every other ship at the dock! And it was full so a shift one boat at a time but it now works. Well spotted.

Also a scenario name change and a fix for NATO recon flights.

This update probably does not require a restart if you are already working on 1.6

This time with the scenario file attached!



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/7/2019 11:00:08 PM)

Anything else on this one guys? Will try and finish it up this weekend.

Tx

B



morphin -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/8/2019 7:01:57 AM)

Hi Gunner

I'm Still playing. I have startet about 3 times and evertime my sub that was mine laying was attacked before hostility beguns (so about 15 to 30 minutes after start).
I have now set the doctrine for the turkey ASW to engage only hostile contacts... (or identify unknown contacts before engage?)
Maybe a lua script that set this back once the fight starts and turkey get hostile?

Thank's
Andy



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/8/2019 8:57:48 AM)

An easy fix.

I can hold off a few days to give you more time if you like. RL then gets crazy again and it will be about a month before I can get back to it.

B



Badlandz -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/9/2019 2:47:00 PM)

Hello Gunner,

Trying the V1.7.

I’m only 2 hours into the fight. Approximately 14Z.

The ships that sortied from the Gölcük naval base still seem to have a pathing problem with the straights.
4 of them went to the straights then turned back SW. One ship started heading east toward Izmit. Looks like some more have departed the base and are heading north. A question about spetnaz: there was a team covering the old location, should there be one on this base?

The TLAM strike was successful. It destroyed the SAM batteries.

+Regarding the Kilos near the straights. I ordered them into the layer (depth -300’) at creep speed. Then I sent the Bulgarians to harass the S-2s. It worked out that the Turks sent 4 F-16s to intercept. All this occurred before H hour. At H hour 2 MiG-29UB were behind the F-16s. A volley of R-73s ended that threat. The AA-10 armed Migs took down the S-2s on either side of the straights. Meanwhile, the southern kilo stalked a Turkish sub and fired a torpedo from within the target’s baffles. Minelaying in progress.

+Initial missle strikes were somewhat successful. I used them to target the Runways and taxiways at Balikesir and Bandirma. Spetnaz report all but one badly damaged. 2 missles were aimed at the sub pen at Erdek. They missed, however, one hit near the dock where some Turkish vessels had been spotted.
AS-6 ARMs were used to take down the 2 Nike batteries SE of Istanbul. One each was sufficient. The AS-5 Kelts are only being used on undefended targets. 2 were easily shot down by AAA near the radar east of Istanbul.

+A runway strike by SU-17 at the Cengiz Topal NAS was not successful. Apparently the anti runway bombs didn’t penetrate the surface. Might be a database issue there. The AAA was able to down a recon aircraft and damage 2 of the strike. Was it 5 batteries plus MANPADs? Wow!

+ I chose the special action to diminish the Air Force. I can not see any impact. Should there be any obvious signs? Reading Andrews great AAR I think I should have selected the same as he did.

+ Small issue with naming. Several groups of aircraft are named the same. The 2 Recce Air Div, 943 Recce Regt and 5th Gds Recce Regt have same names for several types of aircraft. Like I said, a minor issue.

That’s all I recall for now.


Overall, I think things are working. I am enjoying this scenario. Thanks for making it!

Looking forward to the release of the book!

Best Regards
Ed



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/9/2019 3:09:50 PM)

Thanks Ed

I'll move that Spetz patrol, and look at the naming. Thanks

Not sure what to do about the path problem - and I think the anti-runway bomblet issue has been reported.

Those are platoons of AAA, 2 guns each I think but with decent optics.

I think the Air Force option might prove to be the best over time - it reduces the proficiency of a lot of the AC by a level from Veteran down to Regular and one squadron down to Cadet. Evens up the proficiency level with most Soviet AC. Although if that Type 209 gets into your amphibs it will be messy.

Thanks for the report and kind words. Working on MF #4 at the moment.

B



Whicker -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/9/2019 5:46:59 PM)

I have a cunning plan for the ship pathing issue. Working on it now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACnqI1l4I9s



Whicker -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/10/2019 1:15:40 AM)

Ok, I think I have a fix for this particular scenario.

You can use a trigger of unit enters area, with the area around the port but not including the port (ships in port are already in the area) and then the lua changes the course to a preset working course that has the needed way points to escape the port and the straights. You also have to change the ignore plotted course doctrine to No so that they follow the course even if they are engaged offensive.

I also made a video on it here: https://youtu.be/mAVdJypRoeI



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/10/2019 12:20:16 PM)

Whicker
Great Video - amazing how much I learn just watching you play around with the code. Your teaching an old dog some new tricks! Thanks.

B



Badlandz -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/10/2019 5:24:20 PM)

Hello again,

My next major raid was targeted at the Murted AB. A mixed bag of attackers. ARM AS-5 Kelts for the 3 radars located south of Ankara. 4 TU-22RDM ( carrying 3000kg bomb). 4 SU-24 each with 3 1500kg LGB. All escorted by 8 MiG-29 and 2 SU-15.

While running the mission I noted 6 F-16 holding south of Ankara. They didn’t appear interested in engaging until I actually attacked them. I checked the editor and found their prosecution area for Ankara CAP looks messed up. Reference point 11549 was SW of the airbase. I’m guessing that you intended for it to cover the base area. Either way. Fixing and re running the raid.

Any hints on #4?[:D]

I have not detected a 209 as of yet....[X(]

Whicker......I do love Black Adder!



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/11/2019 12:14:34 AM)

Working on MF #4 right now actually [;)]



AndrewJ -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/11/2019 2:28:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Gunner98

Working on MF #4 right now actually [;)]


MF #4, you say... Excellent!

[img]https://i.imgur.com/9z59sht.jpg[/img]



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (3/12/2019 8:36:03 PM)

OK here is version 1.8 with Whicker's great solution to the path problem incorporated.

Also fixed:
-Naming issues
-The Ankara CAP problem
-The trigger happy Turkish ASW pilots should hold off a bit
-The TLAM strikes should come in at the proper time now.

It will be a while before I can get to another update or push this to final so it should give you a bit of time to run with it. With the exception of the path problem there is nothing here that would cause a restart, and if your more than about 12 hours in you've already dealt with most of the path issues.

Thanks again.

B



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (4/8/2019 11:53:52 PM)

OK V1.8 is going to the community page - thanks for your help guys.

B



ClaudeJ -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/11/2022 3:40:20 PM)

Hey there,

the special action "Subvert Air Force Morale" can still be selected after you've chosen one of the other choices. (Build 1147.41, the file is from the CP made available through Steam).


May I suggest adding Rory's Stores Management script ? (As seen in Sakura Blue) It gives a convenient way to check the airbase's magazines up.


PS: I'm having so much fun with the series, by the way. I'm dipping in each theater, my most played save being IF#4 'Gate of Tears' (which sports a couple Belgian platforms, yay!). What I love the most is the ambiance you are setting with the story driven events. It makes me feel like a cog in an immense machinery, trying not to clog up on the sand storm coming my way.
I did treat myself with the e-book Northern Fury, and it's awesome to actually play the scenarios in the context of the global events I'm reading about.



Gunner98 -> RE: New Scenario for testing Med Fury 1 Banging on the Bosporus (2/11/2022 4:15:15 PM)

Hay Claude

Thanks for your kind words. Glad you enjoyed the book.

I'll put that fix on my list and check out Rory's script, haven't played Sakura Blue but I remember that there was quite a build up to it. When I start refitting/rebuilding scenarios (some really need it) I'll consider adding features like this.

The Belgian navy didn't do a lot of expeditionary operations so it is hard to include them. The Navy is small and the Airforce would be sucked into the Central Front vortex. The FF Wandelaar is in STANAVFORLANT which is featured in NF#6 Trondheim Express, she survives and gets moved into convoy operations in NF#34, cannot remember what happens to the others of her class, convoy ops as well I think. The MCM force in 'Gate of Tears' is add-hoc as it didn't exist in 94, but there is also one in the Channel which doesn't get played unfortunately. Cannot remember if there are Belgians in the MCM group that shows up in MF#5, but they'll be used in the later Med scenarios as well.

B



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.158203