RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message


AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 11:46:51 AM)

Just got a MadEx at the Return to Base digression for the aborted G3M2. Am going to have to replay this entire combat but have to pop out for half an hour. Back later.




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 11:51:21 AM)

We both got this so I suspect it will simply happen again. I had trouble with naval air aborts when playing Mayhemizer. Trouble is I can't choose another option as that means killing a carrier plane (which I can't afford to do).

However if that is the only way to continue the game then so be it. I will replay this later with a carrier plane destroyed and see what happens.





warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 12:11:58 PM)

Okay that worked. So when you replay can you destroy the D3A1 (Val) and then reduce the bombs on the other carrier air and one of the G3M2's please. I'm going to lose the carrier anyway so I might as well lose the plane and keep the game going. Really, really disappointing that this aspect of the game is still having problems in this latest version.

Edit: Also I can't see any definition of friendly sea area in RAC. Did the DX pilots survive?




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 12:50:39 PM)

quote:

Edit: Also I can't see any definition of friendly sea area in RAC. Did the DX pilots survive?


It's 14.6.4. I think the pilots on the two DX rolls (5 and 4) should survive as there are friendly ships in the sea area.




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 12:55:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

quote:

Edit: Also I can't see any definition of friendly sea area in RAC. Did the DX pilots survive?


It's 14.6.4. I think the pilots on the two DX rolls (5 and 4) should survive as there are friendly ships in the sea area.
warspite1

LOL - so I was searching for 'friendly'.....




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:02:19 PM)

I've managed to get the result you originally wanted. Aborted the G3M2 and 2 points from the CVP's. Had to immediately do the RTB for the aborted bomber. Once that was done, it went back to do the reductions for the two CVP's. Are you happy to continue?




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:27:00 PM)

I'm going to lose the carrier anyway so happy with the carrier air being shot down. But if you've re-done it then don't go through all that again. So long as there was no manipulation of the game to get around the madexcept - that means we've just stored up more trouble for later - then we can go with what you've got.




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:30:13 PM)

I've got it saved at the AA step now, so not much to re-do. Nothing manipulated to get around the MadEx and worked okay, so shouldn't be storing up problems.

I'll destroy the 3-point CVP so the result will be the same in terms of surviving factors, if that's okay?




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:38:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK

I've got it saved at the AA step now, so not much to re-do. Nothing manipulated to get around the MadEx and worked okay, so shouldn't be storing up problems.

I'll destroy the 3-point CVP so the result will be the same in terms of surviving factors, if that's okay?
warspite1

Yeah that's fine if its not too much effort. Thank-you.




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:42:11 PM)

Re-done with the CVP destroyed.

The Junyo succumbs to multiple hits from the US dive bombers. Where do the Japanese wish to place the 'D'?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/3CDDF6EDE44C4C689BBC108CB880540F.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:45:58 PM)

Tenryu please




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:51:48 PM)

The Tenryu takes severe damage and the Kitakami gets minor splinter damage from near misses. Where do the Japanese place the final 'A'?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/2B7915A283D64B199C365DDA57726022.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:55:35 PM)

Kitakami please




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:57:32 PM)

I went with the computer roll as it was irrelevant what the result was.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/21C89598CFFB4DEF8D8FD33DAB5D4C1D.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:59:18 PM)

Then came the reckoning.

Name your CV.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/D39C5C58867F41099313043BB060EB91.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 1:59:47 PM)

What if a 9 or 10 was rolled - wouldn't that still be a half abort?




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:00:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

What if a 9 or 10 was rolled - wouldn't that still be a half abort?


It would be but 2 1/2 aborts adds up to a full abort anyway.




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:02:53 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AllenK


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

What if a 9 or 10 was rolled - wouldn't that still be a half abort?


It would be but 2 1/2 aborts adds up to a full abort anyway.
warspite1

Ah okay - I was thinking in terms of miss.

Right then, the CV is Hornet please.




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:07:44 PM)

The Japanese pilots do a thorough job on the Hornet.

US stays and fights. How about the Japanese?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/73263E0947734BD5BC5E01565CD8DA8E.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:10:41 PM)

The Japanese stay please




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:11:30 PM)

Does the A6M5 wish to join this round?




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:16:47 PM)

No thank-you.




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:19:11 PM)

Allies decline the subs.

Searches: Allies 8, Axis 6. Both sides lose contact.

Where do Kitakami and Tenryu abort to?




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:20:32 PM)

Fukuoka please




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:25:05 PM)

South China Sea.

Dutch sub initiates and Spitfire from Singapore flies to the 0-box.

Japanese have A6M2's at Java and Bangkok that can reach 3-box and B5N2 at Tarakan that can reach 2-box. Any fliers?




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:29:52 PM)

The A6M2 in Bangkok flies to the 0-box please




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:39:03 PM)

Allies commit subs.

Searches: Allies 5, Axis 10. No combat.

Chinese Bostons try a ground strike on the units at Canton. Japanese CVP can intercept if it wishes?

[image]local://upfiles/47730/BA618C8659214C2AB1B3D3D2FD499BE5.jpg[/image]




warspite1 -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:39:42 PM)

No thank-you.




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:42:46 PM)

Strikes against the airfield and Japanese HQ are successful.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/0018CE1F61D342C3AD835AD27A38D316.jpg[/image]




AllenK -> RE: Folly a deux: AllenK vs Warspite1 AAR (2/2/2020 2:47:59 PM)

The Communists push up to the Japanese.

[image]local://upfiles/47730/BC86C2383C354C7C891F20A18E7E59F0.jpg[/image]




Page: <<   < prev  42 43 [44] 45 46   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.796875