RE: The question to ask about The Italians (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 8:03:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

The details are unnecessary. It is clear that the Germans have far more than enough force to overwhelm Spain.

In programming, this is called "Information Hiding":

You can't see the forest if you bury yourself in the trees.

So, German planners will determine the right amount of force to bring to bear on Spain. They have more than enough to choose from.


warspite1

But why are the details not necessary? I thought we were intending to pursue an interesting discussion to look at the effects of the Germans going for a Med first strategy? I thought we would be looking at the troops required, the likely plan of attack, what this new direction means for the war generally, you know all the interesting things that a counter-factual sparks off. And above all we would be looking to gauge whether the Germans would be in a better position than had they gone with what happened historically. And if they were, then to what extent would that actually mean they had a chance of winning the war.

But instead, all you seem to be intent on providing is a superficial, high level 'staff study' that provides no detail about anything and effectively says this:

The Germans have got the biggest badass army in the world. We know the Spanish are weak. So lets just say some German 'army group' or other (it doesn't matter which as they are all homogeneous and besides they will be overwhelming), blitzes the Spaniards and then take Gibraltar. No details, no timing, other than we'll start at stupid o'clock (no R+R required for these super troopers), who will be supplied by super trains, and they will have it all wrapped up in time for tea and medals before moving on to the next, equally successful phase.

There will be little response from the British because they have noticed a motor boat - The Saucy Sue - moored in Boulogne harbour and suspect the Germans will cross the channel packed with tens of troops to storm the beach of southern England. The British are especially worried because they've seen a searchlight on the boat and suspect the Germans will come over at night, cunningly negating Fighter Command. Clearly with this level of threat, the British decide not to send any troops or aircraft anywhere else. Apparently there is proof of that because it seems there was no second BEF (I wonder where the Wiki article for that went?). Okay I exaggerated the point about the invasion but that was borne out of frustration with the whole stupid Northern France/Demonstration/Barges nonsense.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch - er I mean the Peninsular, the conveniently, but totally unrealistically, compliant Spaniards sue for peace as soon as a German counter occupies a hex in Madrid (cos that's the rulz) and, grateful to their conquerors the Germans, the Spaniards agree that its time to stop fighting and make love not war. They decide Franco is still their man despite presiding over this disaster. Hitler rolls his eyes and aims a playful smile at the restored Claudillo (despite forcing him into this action), and everyone is happy and free to live a life of religious fulfilment.

The Germans pile some highly trained, crack Italian peacekeepers in to police the joint just in case the Spanish do get a bit miffed about the needless death and carnage wrought on their already scarred country, the further physical damage to the infrastructure, and of course the small matter that they have no food and no oil. But hey, its cool, the Italians, who were complicit in the invasion will be loved and admired and will sort it. Besides we don't need to bother ourselves with details.

Meanwhile in phase II of the operation, those cunning Italians have decided to go along with a spiffing wheeze cooked up by those dastardly Germans. The Italian 10th Army cross over the Egyptian border. They jump up and down, blow a few raspberries and do a few moonies. The British, angered by such provocation, decide to attack with their massive WDF. BUT the Italians have a surprise in store. They don't hang around, but instead race back to Tripoli with their highly mechanised army staying out of reach of the British. The Italians only stop when they get to the Libyan capital, turn around and laugh at the British who are now surrounded as the Germans have charged through the Middle East to take the undefended Cairo from the rear!! D'oh says Churchill, we never saw that one coming.

Where did those Germans come from? Well in a "wash, rinse, repeat" of Spain, the German 'army group' have blitz'd through Turkey and the Middle East. No details necessary because like with Spain we are talking overwhelming force, super trains, no supply issues regardless of terrain, compliant victims, no politics, no alternate response allowed from the Allies or Stalin who is seeing his country threatened from Petsamo to the Caucasus (although to be clear, with all this going on in the west, Stalin is allowed to make threatening noises toward Japan of course). It's just all very simple and straightforward - where was Curtis Lemay when Hitler needed him?

Speaking of Japan, they can see what is happening in Europe and, [cough] quite understandably, they believe a Soviet attack on Manchuria is imminent (and there is probably a Wiki article to confirm that). They therefore don't take the historical route of trying to improve their dire economic and military situation and decide to do...... nothing*. A navy consuming 400 tons of oil an hour - despite not being at war (other than China), a USN that with it's latest announcement, will be out-building the Japanese massively, losses in China impacting the ability of the military to grow, an embargo of strategic materials.... but the Japanese decide to do nothing because it will help the Germans in this scenario (er I mean it will stop the Soviets from launching their imminent invasion)....

*Note Curtis Lemay is a little at war with himself on this, but he's confirmed that if the Japanese do decide to do something then of course it will be to attack the NEI only because apparently there is no way the Japanese would ever go to war with the US because of oil..........(weird, I'm sure I read a Wiki article on something called Pearl Harbor - maybe I imagined it).


I mean apart from the fact that it is total sloblocks, what have you just achieved by stating that? What does that superficial nonsense actually mean? What does that lack of any interesting detail actually tell us? What use is that Janet and John episode - er sorry, I mean 'staff study' to anyone?

In your scenario you now have the Germans as owners of the Med and North Africa from Gibraltar to Suez, and you have the German Army poised to attack the Soviets in May/June 1942. You have the USA not in the war and no sign of them entering. And so what? Because you've explored nothing, because you've provided no detail, there is no gauge as to what this alternate strategy may have cost the Axis compared to real life, there is no assessment of what the Allies could have done differently its just been a pointless Axis wet dream.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:05:31 PM)

quote:

Second Expeditionary Force

The following force was sent to France during the second week of June 1940 in an unsuccessful attempt to form a second British Expeditionary Force. This second formation was to be commanded by Lieutenant-General A. F. Brooke. All units were evacuated in late June 1940, during Operation Ariel.

1st Canadian Infantry Brigade (from 1st Canadian Infantry Division)
Royal Canadian Regiment
Hastings and Prince Edward Regiment
48th Highlanders of Canada
1st Field Regiment Royal Canadian Horse Artillery

52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division

Major General J. S. Drew

155th Infantry Brigade
7th/9th (Highlanders) Battalion, Royal Scots
4th Battalion, King's Own Scottish Borderers
5th Battalion, King's Own Scottish Borderers
156th Infantry Brigade
4th/5th Battalion, Royal Scots Fusiliers
6th Battalion, Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders
7th Battalion, Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders
157th Infantry Brigade
1st Battalion, Glasgow Highlanders
5th Battalion, Highland Light Infantry
6th Battalion, Highland Light Infantry
Commander Royal Artillery
70th Field Regiment, Royal Artillery
71st Field Regiment, Royal Artillery
78th Field Regiment, Royal Artillery
54th (Queen's Own Royal Glasgow Yeomanry) Anti-Tank Regiment, Royal Artillery
Commander Royal Engineers
202nd Field Company, Royal Engineers
241st Field Company, Royal Engineers
554th Field Company, Royal Engineers
243rd Field Park Company, Royal Engineers


and went to Boulogne

quote:

20th Guards Brigade Group[nb 9]

2nd Battalion, Irish Guards
2nd Battalion, Welsh Guards
20th Guards Brigade Anti-Tank Company


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Expeditionary_Force_order_of_battle_(1940)

Plus:

quote:

The 1st Armoured Division first saw service during the Second World War in incomplete form under the command of Major-General Roger Evans[6] when the second British Expeditionary Force (2nd BEF) was sent to France in May 1940.[7] The 1st Armoured Division, consisting of the understrength 2nd and 3rd Armoured Brigades, along with the 1st Support Group, and with no infantry support (which had been transferred in April to form the 30th Infantry Brigade), landed in France on 14 May 1940[8] and, after suffering heavy tank losses during the Battle of France, was evacuated to England on 16 June, having fought south of the river Somme, isolated from the other British formations.[9]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_(United_Kingdom)_Division#3_September_1939




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:42:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Of course they don't. However they can see what is happening in Europe just as well as Stalin....


Actually, Stalin didn't see what was happening in Europe. That's why he was caught flat-footed by Barbarossa.

quote:

Curtis, Curtis, Curtis what is it???? I am at a loss. What I would do is totally and utterly irrelevant to anything. We are trying - or at least I thought we were trying when I thought this was an attempt at a serious discussion - to put ourselves in the position of the Japanese leaders at the time - you know, the ones who went to war with the US over oil!!!!!!!!!


You were castigating me for not wanting war with the US over oil. Clearly, you thought that was a bad decision. Don't even think about a run for office.

quote:

No. Different circumstances mean potentially different actions. We are trying to work out what they would have done given a) what they did historically, b) who was making the decisions, c) what the likely effects of each option were. There is NOTHING written in stone to say the outcome may not have been the same.


Written in Wiki, though. The Japs can't go to war with the US while the Soviets are staring at their backs.

Furthermore, all the embargoes were triggered by Japanese aggression. Without that aggression, there's no reason to expect an oil embargo. Without the oil embargo no Rising Sun offensive. The US remains neutral.

quote:

But why was it? I thought you were suggesting it didn't cost much and "not as urgent as [I was] claiming". OR maybe, as I was suggesting it was just one great big drain on resources, a drain that had to take a back seat given the decisions the Japanese made in particular from July 1941 onwards.


Again, the war in China has been going on for years with little progress. Why has it suddenly become so urgent? They can wait.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:45:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:47:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

The British can't discount it completely, of course not. But you have this rather quaint notion that regardless of whether the Germans launch a full on BoB operation or sit around doing nothing but sampling the delights of the fleshpots of downtown Paris, the British will take the same precautions, release the same number of troops and air assets elsewhere. Its fanciful.


I don't think it's a quaint notion at all. There will be obvious preparations regarding barges and such. The Luftwaffe will be "demonstrating".




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:53:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The problem with using the "right" amount of force is judging how much is too much or how much is too little. You might be missing a nail, and for the want of a nail . . .


So, unless I detail how much water is to be in each soldier's canteen, the operation is deemed impossible? This is what desperation looks like, folks.

The Germans have overwhelming force in France. More than enough to send an enormous force to Spain, with plenty left over to cow the Channel.

quote:

Fast speed boats for a channel invasion? Unless there is a massive CAP overhead they will get bombed and strafed. Enemy fast speed boats countering that they will have to sail through under fire, not to mention DDs and other fast vessels. Then artillery fire from shore besides. Then how much can they land in one go? Because while they are debarking their load, they are very vulnerable. So how many make it through on their first and probably only chance?


This is at night. No RAF. The RN must stay out of Stuka range during the day, only heading for the channel after sundown. They have to get back out of range before dawn as well. That gives them only a short window in the crossing lanes. Fast motor boats can get in and out before the RN gets there.

Or, at least that would be the threat. And that's all that matters in this scenario.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:54:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.
warspite1

Why do you insist on adding to your list of things you plainly know nothing about?

Is Norway a European country?




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:56:45 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

You were castigating me for not wanting war with the US over oil. Clearly, you thought that was a bad decision.

warspite1

Why do you insist on making things up - it doesn't put you in a good light






Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 3:59:07 PM)

This was from the designer’s notes from SPI’s Korea wargame about how difficult it was to sever rail supply lines by air:

“Railroads are easier to repair than roads. A thirty-six division CCF army can be supplied by as little as one train of 50 cars per day.”

36 divisions, by the way, would be what I'd call an Army Group.

Now, how many trains can be pushed down a single line in a day? Surely at least 24 (1 per hour for the math challenged).

As I've said, a rail line can keep an enormous amount of force supplied. So much so, that it isn't even necessary to check if it's enough.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:02:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

You were castigating me for not wanting war with the US over oil. Clearly, you thought that was a bad decision.

warspite1

Why do you insist on making things up - it doesn't put you in a good light


You hoped I would never run a country because I suggested that Japan not go to war over oil. Wiggle out of that if you can.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:07:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Written in Wiki, though. The Japs can't go to war with the US while the Soviets are staring at their backs.

warspite1

The Japanese can go to war because the Soviets are doing no such thing. But regardless, the Japanese have a judgement call to make. Even if the Soviets were making noises in the east (which of course they most certainly weren't) it would be a case of choosing the lesser of two evils for the Japanese.

To say they 'can't' go to war is patently false. You have seen a comment in Wiki and its like you are clinging to it for dear life as though it somehow proves you right even though the circumstances it is written about aren't what we are discussing. Barbarossa 1941 hasn't happened okay?




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:13:35 PM)

Also, one issue on Turkey:

The Germans, having planned the invasion well in advance, will have brought extensive ferry assets to the operation. They can cross via the Sea of Marmara - and thereby taking the straits from both sides. No way the Turks will have such a huge front defended, even if they had the force to do so - which they don't.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:15:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

To say they 'can't' go to war is patently false. You have seen a comment in Wiki and its like you are clinging to it for dear life as though it somehow proves you right even though the circumstances it is written about aren't what we are discussing. Barbarossa 1941 hasn't happened okay?


Not only can't they go to war in that situation, they will have no need to do so. They will stay out of French Indochina.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:15:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Again, the war in China has been going on for years with little progress. Why has it suddenly become so urgent? They can wait.

warspite1

Again, I wonder if we are talking in different languages. I don't think I could make myself much plainer.

Where have I said that the war in China has "suddenly become so urgent"?

Just what is it you don't understand about any warfare, and 20th Century warfare no more and no less?

Wars are ruinously expensive, they topple governments, they bankrupt nations. Regardless of whether Japan go all out or whether they, ahem, put the war on the back-burner, the Japanese presence in China is costing Japan an absolute fortune in money and material. Only the quantum is affected by the type of war, but not that it is ruinous either way.

Now, what don't you understand about that and the situation Japan is in. You know, Japan with little resources of its own, Japan with an embargo on strategic materials against it, Japan surrounded by enemies, actual and potential.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 4:17:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

The British can't discount it completely, of course not. But you have this rather quaint notion that regardless of whether the Germans launch a full on BoB operation or sit around doing nothing but sampling the delights of the fleshpots of downtown Paris, the British will take the same precautions, release the same number of troops and air assets elsewhere. Its fanciful.


I don't think it's a quaint notion at all. There will be obvious preparations regarding barges and such. The Luftwaffe will be "demonstrating".
warspite1

Meaningless. Explain what you mean.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 5:01:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Also, one issue on Turkey:

The Germans, having planned the invasion well in advance, will have brought extensive ferry assets to the operation. They can cross via the Sea of Marmara - and thereby taking the straits from both sides. No way the Turks will have such a huge front defended, even if they had the force to do so - which they don't.


Ferry assets? Please define what you mean.

Planned the invasion well in advance? Why would they? The quick taking of France surprised the Germans, then they had to take Spain, so why would the German staff be planning this?

Would Romania even allow this movement through their country? Allow the use of their airfields? Not to mention Bulgaria!

Anyways. the total distance between the Black Sea and the Med is only 380 kilometers or 235 miles long, with the Sea of Marmora being 280 kilometers × 80 kilometers or 174 miles × 50 miles. With mobile scouts calling in artillery and mortar fire, any vessels making the crossing would have a little difficulty. While mobile infantry and possibly armour forces could be rushing to defensive positions. Not to mention your average Turk with a firearm.

Since the vessels would have to come in by truck, those vessels would not be very large nor would there be that many of them. The forces that come across would most be infantry and they would be disorganized with little supply available.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 5:23:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

This was from the designer’s notes from SPI’s Korea wargame about how difficult it was to sever rail supply lines by air:

“Railroads are easier to repair than roads. A thirty-six division CCF army can be supplied by as little as one train of 50 cars per day.”

36 divisions, by the way, would be what I'd call an Army Group.

Now, how many trains can be pushed down a single line in a day? Surely at least 24 (1 per hour for the math challenged).

As I've said, a rail line can keep an enormous amount of force supplied. So much so, that it isn't even necessary to check if it's enough.



CCF? Do you mean the People's Volunteer Army?

Those Chinese divisions number 9,500 men at full strength with little to no heavy equipment. That does not compare to a Western military division in manpower nor supply needs, much less armoured and motorized formations on the move. The US 1st Marine division wrecked at least 6 of those divisions on its own in 1950. The Chinese Army that it was fighting asked for 60,000 replacements and was ineffective for 3 months. After the UN forces were pushed out of North Korea, the Chinese were out of supplies. That does not sound very good for an attacking force.

So don't compare Korea to Spain.

Check military historians and military publications for better details than a game designed to make money.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 5:41:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The problem with using the "right" amount of force is judging how much is too much or how much is too little. You might be missing a nail, and for the want of a nail . . .


So, unless I detail how much water is to be in each soldier's canteen, the operation is deemed impossible? This is what desperation looks like, folks.

You are trying to equate force with logistics. Force is dependent upon logistical support but but logistical support with nothing to use it with and trained people to use it is just a waste. You are the desperate one on this. And no, you don't have to know how much water is to be in each soldier's canteen but you do need to know how many soldiers there will be and thus how many canteens are needed, where there is potable water for resupply. That goes for every other piece of equipment needed plus the supplies needed.

The Germans have overwhelming force in France. More than enough to send an enormous force to Spain, with plenty left over to cow the Channel.

What does "cow the Channel" mean? Or are you saying that you want to scare the Channel? I don't think that much of anything than man can do will scare the Channel, at least not what I have seen.

quote:

Fast speed boats for a channel invasion? Unless there is a massive CAP overhead they will get bombed and strafed. Enemy fast speed boats countering that they will have to sail through under fire, not to mention DDs and other fast vessels. Then artillery fire from shore besides. Then how much can they land in one go? Because while they are debarking their load, they are very vulnerable. So how many make it through on their first and probably only chance?


This is at night. No RAF. The RN must stay out of Stuka range during the day, only heading for the channel after sundown. They have to get back out of range before dawn as well. That gives them only a short window in the crossing lanes. Fast motor boats can get in and out before the RN gets there.

But the RAF is not timid and they would have flown at night because the did fly at night. They would have flown bombers against any invasion, no matter the odds. The RN is not timid either and would go into Harm's Way because that is what they are there for. They do not have to get out of range since they will have the unattacked Fighter Command for Combat Air Patrols and Radar which could see the Luftwaffe formations as they formed up over France. The Fast Motor Boats of a type not yet described could not do the job that you want them to do.

Or, at least that would be the threat. And that's all that matters in this scenario.


But someone might call their bluff. In fact, during the real Battle of Britain, the Bomber Command was busy attacking the Lufewaffe's airfields in France.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 5:53:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

You were castigating me for not wanting war with the US over oil. Clearly, you thought that was a bad decision.

warspite1

Why do you insist on making things up - it doesn't put you in a good light


You hoped I would never run a country because I suggested that Japan not go to war over oil. Wiggle out of that if you can.


They would go to war over oil. Other countries have done so. But the oil embargo against Japan was one of many reasons why Japan attacked the United States.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 5:55:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.
warspite1

Why do you insist on adding to your list of things you plainly know nothing about?

Is Norway a European country?



Poland never surrendered. After the occupation, the highest number of people in the Polish military was 249,000 plus at least one brown bear who was promoted to Sergeant.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 9:10:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

You hoped I would never run a country because I suggested that Japan not go to war over oil. Wiggle out of that if you can.

warspite1

And this comment reflects so badly on you. There is nothing for me to wiggle out of because you’ve simply failed to understand the point – and not for the first time. The more we’ve gone back and forth the more you’ve chosen to mis-represent what I’ve said and that is pretty poor show.

I don’t see any point in continuing this monotonous back and forth on what Japan would or wouldn’t do given a change in the start date of Barbarossa. I mean, as tiresome as it is there would at least be some point if the main area of focus was worthwhile. But you admitted yesterday that you aren’t going to provide anything to support your assertion that a Mediterranean-first strategy would see Germany win the war (although you haven’t even said that). As far as you’re concerned there is no need for details, no need for you to explain anything.

So basically you’ve fancifully and self-importantly created a “staff study” that is nothing more than a Nazi wet dream (though I do not suggest you wanted a German victory). You refuse to provide anything worthwhile or interesting to support your scenario.

You seem to equate what is required for war gaming a scenario, with the actual planning and detail required of a real campaign – that is naïve to put it kindly. Your idea of people’s behaviour is pretty alarming too. You think Franco could refuse Hitler’s request to join the Axis, be invaded (with all that means) and then Hitler would allow him to remain as head of Spain. You believe the Spanish would be happy with this because Hitler gives them Gibraltar - yet in real life this wasn’t enough for Franco. You bandy phrases like Vichy Spain around with no concept of what that even means. You think that Mussolini would suborn himself and Italy completely to the will of Hitler as though in a board game and Hitler can order all Italian divisions around at his pleasure; you have absolutely no concept of Goering’s personality and what made him tick, and despite having an overwhelming superiority in numbers you think the Luftwaffe would leave England alone in the summer of 1940 despite all evidence to the contrary; you don’t think the Soviets would see any problem with Germany owning the Turkish Straits; you simply refuse point blank to believe Japan would attack the NEI and the USA, but would attack the NEI alone, even though Japan did the former in real life.

But what is even more surprising – quite shocking actually - is you’ve shown just how little knowledge you actually have about World War II. To be waxing ‘authoritatively’ about the Battle of Britain and not even know when it took place; to talk about what the British may or may not do in an alternate 1940 and not even know about the second BEF, or the start date of Compass, or what Compass was designed to achieve, you talk about Sea Lion and have no concept that the barges you would have the Germans set aside (as a deception) had a very real economic impact. You talk about what Japan may or may not have done had circumstances been different in 1940 and not even know about the invasion dates of the FIC or the action taken by the US in response to each and not even have the slightest understanding of her economic position or how much oil/strategic material she lost to the various embargoes placed against her, you don’t believe the war in China is a drain on resources because you believe it’s ‘on hold’. You state categorically that all European countries surrendered in World War II upon capture of their capital and yet you don’t know about Norway. You simply dismiss the political angles of this scenario through sheer ignorance of Germany’s position and why Hitler chose actions he took in real life – ‘1941 the Germans would occupy Vichy France’ without bothering to ask yourself why Hitler felt he needed Vichy in place; you believe Vichy signed an armistice with the ‘Axis’; you seem to have absolutely no knowledge or understanding of how many divisions it took to occupy Greece and Yugoslavia, and don’t feel it worth mentioning when looking at Spain or Turkey and the further impact on forces available for Barbarossa. You think the Germans – if they were lucky enough to capture Suez intact, would destroy the canal; you think you can talk about Spain and her contribution to Germany post occupation but you have no idea of Spain’s parlous position with food and fuel. You believe she can be plundered for trains (different gauge) and trucks (she doesn’t have – and any she does have taken will make the food situation even worse). You believe the Germans just needed to produce stukas in 1940/41….

We could have saved 5-6 pages or whatever it was on this debate (the below contains as much detail as you’ve actually contributed):

Germany heads south 1940

A staff study by C Lemay

Chapter 1.

The Germans bring an army group, for overwhelming force, to operations in Spain, Turkey and Egypt. Germany make friends with the Spanish and Turks. They then turn on the USSR.

Chapter 2.

The Allies can’t react at all (apart from moving into Libya so they can be surrounded) cos the Germans are demonstrating in the north with barges.

Chapter 3.

Regardless of what happens to them, their economy or military, the Japanese do nothing in order to keep the Americans out of the war until the Germans have won.

Chapter 4.

Tea and Medals





RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 9:27:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

You hoped I would never run a country because I suggested that Japan not go to war over oil. Wiggle out of that if you can.

warspite1

And this comment reflects so badly on you. There is nothing for me to wiggle out of because you’ve simply failed to understand the point – and not for the first time. The more we’ve gone back and forth the more you’ve chosen to mis-represent what I’ve said and that is pretty poor show.

I don’t see any point in continuing this monotonous back and forth on what Japan would or wouldn’t do given a change in the start date of Barbarossa. I mean, as tiresome as it is there would at least be some point if the main area of focus was worthwhile. But you admitted yesterday that you aren’t going to provide anything to support your assertion that a Mediterranean-first strategy would see Germany win the war (although you haven’t even said that). As far as you’re concerned there is no need for details, no need for you to explain anything.

So basically you’ve fancifully and self-importantly created a “staff study” that is nothing more than a Nazi wet dream (though I do not suggest you wanted a German victory). You refuse to provide anything worthwhile or interesting to support your scenario.

You seem to equate what is required for war gaming a scenario, with the actual planning and detail required of a real campaign – that is naïve to put it kindly. Your idea of people’s behaviour is pretty alarming too. You think Franco could refuse Hitler’s request to join the Axis, be invaded (with all that means) and then Hitler would allow him to remain as head of Spain. You believe the Spanish would be happy with this because Hitler gives them Gibraltar - yet in real life this wasn’t enough for Franco. You bandy phrases like Vichy Spain around with no concept of what that even means. You think that Mussolini would suborn himself and Italy completely to the will of Hitler as though in a board game and Hitler can order all Italian divisions around at his pleasure; you have absolutely no concept of Goering’s personality and what made him tick, and despite having an overwhelming superiority in numbers you think the Luftwaffe would leave England alone in the summer of 1940 despite all evidence to the contrary; you don’t think the Soviets would see any problem with Germany owning the Turkish Straits; you simply refuse point blank to believe Japan would attack the NEI and the USA, but would attack the NEI alone, even though Japan did the former in real life.

But what is even more surprising – quite shocking actually - is you’ve shown just how little knowledge you actually have about World War II. To be waxing ‘authoritatively’ about the Battle of Britain and not even know when it took place; to talk about what the British may or may not do in an alternate 1940 and not even know about the second BEF, or the start date of Compass, or what Compass was designed to achieve, you talk about Sea Lion and have no concept that the barges you would have the Germans set aside (as a deception) had a very real economic impact. You talk about what Japan may or may not have done had circumstances been different in 1940 and not even know about the invasion dates of the FIC or the action taken by the US in response to each and not even have the slightest understanding of her economic position or how much oil/strategic material she lost to the various embargoes placed against her, you don’t believe the war in China is a drain on resources because you believe it’s ‘on hold’. You state categorically that all European countries surrendered in World War II upon capture of their capital and yet you don’t know about Norway. You simply dismiss the political angles of this scenario through sheer ignorance of Germany’s position and why Hitler chose actions he took in real life – ‘1941 the Germans would occupy Vichy France’ without bothering to ask yourself why Hitler felt he needed Vichy in place; you believe Vichy signed an armistice with the ‘Axis’; you seem to have absolutely no knowledge or understanding of how many divisions it took to occupy Greece and Yugoslavia, and don’t feel it worth mentioning when looking at Spain or Turkey and the further impact on forces available for Barbarossa. You think the Germans – if they were lucky enough to capture Suez intact, would destroy the canal; you think you can talk about Spain and her contribution to Germany post occupation but you have no idea of Spain’s parlous position with food and fuel. You believe she can be plundered for trains (different gauge) and trucks (she doesn’t have – and any she does have taken will make the food situation even worse). You believe the Germans just needed to produce stukas in 1940/41….

We could have saved 5-6 pages or whatever it was on this debate (the below contains as much detail as you’ve actually contributed):

Germany heads south 1940

A staff study by C Lemay

Chapter 1.

The Germans bring an army group, for overwhelming force, to operations in Spain, Turkey and Egypt. Germany make friends with the Spanish and Turks. They then turn on the USSR.

Chapter 2.

The Allies can’t react at all (apart from moving into Libya so they can be surrounded) cos the Germans are demonstrating in the north with barges.

Chapter 3.

Regardless of what happens to them, their economy or military, the Japanese do nothing in order to keep the Americans out of the war until the Germans have won.

Chapter 4.

Tea, crumpets, and Medals


There, I fixed it for you. [;)]




Aurelian -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/29/2020 10:27:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.
warspite1

Why do you insist on adding to your list of things you plainly know nothing about?

Is Norway a European country?



Poland never surrendered. After the occupation, the highest number of people in the Polish military was 249,000 plus at least one brown bear who was promoted to Sergeant.


Neither did France, they signed an armistice. And Spain would surrender because the capital falls? Someone should of told them during the war with Napoleon. And the Chinese during their war with Japan. And both Koreas during that war.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 12:55:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.
warspite1

Why do you insist on adding to your list of things you plainly know nothing about?

Is Norway a European country?



Poland never surrendered. After the occupation, the highest number of people in the Polish military was 249,000 plus at least one brown bear who was promoted to Sergeant.


Neither did France, they signed an armistice. And Spain would surrender because the capital falls? Someone should of told them during the war with Napoleon. And the Chinese during their war with Japan. And both Koreas during that war.


Someone is thinking of a board game like Avalon Hill's Third Reich. [8|]




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 6:35:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

And, all they have to do is get to Madrid, whereupon Spain will surrender and her forces will dissolve.

warspite1

Why is that then? How do you know that will definitely happen?


Every other European country did the exact same thing.
warspite1

Why do you insist on adding to your list of things you plainly know nothing about?

Is Norway a European country?



Poland never surrendered. After the occupation, the highest number of people in the Polish military was 249,000 plus at least one brown bear who was promoted to Sergeant.


Neither did France, they signed an armistice. And Spain would surrender because the capital falls? Someone should of told them during the war with Napoleon. And the Chinese during their war with Japan. And both Koreas during that war.
warspite1

I specifically mentioned Norway as there was around two months - and plenty of fighting - between the fall of Oslo and the surrender of Norwegian forces - and the Norwegians only surrendered then because their Allies left and they were left with little apart from Narvik and the arctic wastes to defend. But you and RangerJoe are quite right, There was additional fighting in France after Paris was occupied and in Poland after Warsaw was captured. The Poles never surrendered, they simply ran out of country to defend and troops to defend with and, whilst we can't say with certainty, there is every reason to believe the Spaniards would have done the same given the circumstances of their betrayal. In addition to the two you mentioned, Belgium continued fighting for a time after Brussels was occupied. I haven't bothered checking the other countries.

Of course if we move outside of World War II the examples are many - but just sticking to World War II, these four examples alone gives the lie to "Every other European country did the exact same thing" and simply reflect, once again, that no effort, no fact checking, no detail has gone into this faintly ridiculous 'staff study'.




Aurelian -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 11:37:28 AM)

I always giggle when I hear that the loss a capital city means game over. A city doesn't run the country, the gov't does. And they can move. The Soviets moved the gov't to Kuybyshev, for example.

The Dutch continued to fight the Japanese before their colonies were lost.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_governments_in_exile_during_World_War_II

Staff studies/wargames. Japan did that before Midway. They changed the outcome to fit their preconceived conclusion. Ditto Russia before Barbarossa. And the Germans did too. And we all how how well that study went.




Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 11:43:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aurelian

I always giggle when I hear that the loss a capital city means game over. A city doesn't run the country, the gov't does. And they can move. The Soviets moved the gov't to Kuybyshev, for example.

The Duke of Wellington predicted a Mexican victory in the US-Mexican War, because he expected the Mexicans to carry on guerrilla warfare like the Spanish did vs Napoleon. He was shocked when the Mexicans surrendered after Mexico City fell. This was the exception.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 3:21:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Wars are ruinously expensive, they topple governments, they bankrupt nations. Regardless of whether Japan go all out or whether they, ahem, put the war on the back-burner, the Japanese presence in China is costing Japan an absolute fortune in money and material. Only the quantum is affected by the type of war, but not that it is ruinous either way.

Now, what don't you understand about that and the situation Japan is in. You know, Japan with little resources of its own, Japan with an embargo on strategic materials against it, Japan surrounded by enemies, actual and potential.


Therefore, Japan should go to war with every nation under the sun.

Clearly, the war in China didn't topple their government during WWII, as it sat on the back burner. It can wait. The Japanese can't go to war with the US while the Soviets are unencumbered.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 3:36:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Ferry assets? Please define what you mean.


They could again use river barges. They would have to be small enough to be craned onto flat-bed rail cars, then trailered to the sea by truck. But that would still make them big enough to handle that sea.

quote:

Planned the invasion well in advance? Why would they? The quick taking of France surprised the Germans, then they had to take Spain, so why would the German staff be planning this?


They've decided from the get-go that they will pursue a Med strategy. Plenty of time to plan - Barbarossa was done in less time.

quote:

Would Romania even allow this movement through their country? Allow the use of their airfields? Not to mention Bulgaria!


Romania isn't necessary. Bulgaria is an Axis nation as of March 1, 1941. Yugoslavia is on the menu.

quote:

Anyways. the total distance between the Black Sea and the Med is only 380 kilometers or 235 miles long, with the Sea of Marmora being 280 kilometers × 80 kilometers or 174 miles × 50 miles. With mobile scouts calling in artillery and mortar fire, any vessels making the crossing would have a little difficulty. While mobile infantry and possibly armour forces could be rushing to defensive positions. Not to mention your average Turk with a firearm.


A fantasy. In fact, most of the Turkish force is in front of the Bosporus. It's all going to be trapped when these German divisions arrive in their rear at Istanbul.

quote:

Since the vessels would have to come in by truck, those vessels would not be very large nor would there be that many of them. The forces that come across would most be infantry and they would be disorganized with little supply available.


Again, towed by trailers. They can be large enough - larger than a Higgins boat.. And there can be as many as can be gleaned from the rivers of Europe. A lot.




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (8/30/2020 3:37:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

This was from the designer’s notes from SPI’s Korea wargame about how difficult it was to sever rail supply lines by air:

“Railroads are easier to repair than roads. A thirty-six division CCF army can be supplied by as little as one train of 50 cars per day.”

36 divisions, by the way, would be what I'd call an Army Group.

Now, how many trains can be pushed down a single line in a day? Surely at least 24 (1 per hour for the math challenged).

As I've said, a rail line can keep an enormous amount of force supplied. So much so, that it isn't even necessary to check if it's enough.



CCF? Do you mean the People's Volunteer Army?

Those Chinese divisions number 9,500 men at full strength with little to no heavy equipment. That does not compare to a Western military division in manpower nor supply needs, much less armoured and motorized formations on the move. The US 1st Marine division wrecked at least 6 of those divisions on its own in 1950. The Chinese Army that it was fighting asked for 60,000 replacements and was ineffective for 3 months. After the UN forces were pushed out of North Korea, the Chinese were out of supplies. That does not sound very good for an attacking force.

So don't compare Korea to Spain.

Check military historians and military publications for better details than a game designed to make money.

That was from ONE train per day. A rail line can handle far more than that.




Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
7.062988