MasterChief -> RE: Goodbye Beautiful Carrier Names (8/22/2004 5:55:47 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterChief quote:
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay quote:
Being a 23 year submariner, I still cringe thinking that we missed such a great opp to return to our heritage and name the new class of fast attacks after fish! Perhaps starting with the top five sub aces of the war and work from there. Instead we get VIRGINIA... no offense to that great state, but it's just not right!!! On the other hand I just got orders to a ship who's name sake epitomizes the American Fighting Spirit ...USS THE SULLIVANS DDG 68 Master Chief, How do you feel, as a 23 year submarine veteran, about going onto a vessel designed to hunt subs? Or are the SSNs now considered to be the only sub hunters in a carrier TF? Always been a big supporter of the total warfighting team! The Tin Can Navy's heritage is just as rich as our submarine heritage!! I'm looking forward to the challenge! Besides, I'm all for anything that hunts the "BAD GUYS" submarines regardless of platform or warefare community. Hell, if the Marines ever figure out a way to take out a KILO running on batteries, I'll give them a healthy ooh-raw and join on up!! [;)] Have you had a chance to participate in exercises with the Upholders in RN service or as ignorantly named Canadian Victoria, Windsor, Corner Brook and Cretien's home town. Really sad naming calls as they are place names YET again. Ask because they are supposed to be leaps and bounds ahaean of Kilos and Collins class boats in quietness. Don't want to get to indepth on this for obvious reasons, suffice it to say that any modern conventional sub, running on batteries and operating in high background noise environments (ie littoral waters) presents a major challenge for nuc boats. This is where training and crew competance makes the difference.
|
|
|
|