Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:07:49 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		Moving east, fuirther into China.

These screen shots were taken with the optional rule for additional Chinese cities turned off. You can still see where they are by their names though: Sining, Ningsia, Yenan, Tianshui, Tungkwan, etc..




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 91
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:09:42 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		Due south from the previous post.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 92
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:11:27 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		One last move to the south, to Singapore.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 93
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:13:14 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		Moving back to the north, here is Vladivostok to Chengchow - showing all of Korea.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 94
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:14:58 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		13th in the series and the last at zoom level 5. Southeastern China.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 95
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:16:28 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		14th in series. The middle east at zoom level 2.




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Shannon V. OKeets -- 7/15/2008 9:20:43 AM >

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 96
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:22:46 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		15th in series - due east of the previous post.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 97
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:24:33 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		Due south of the previous post - from Bombay to Saigon, via Singapore.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 98
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 9:27:15 AM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline 		17th and last in series. Together with the 18 screen shots for the USSR, that about covers all of Asia.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 99
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 10:19:12 AM   
marcuswatney

 

Posts: 279
Joined: 2/28/2006
Status: offline 		Mecca is not on the coast.  The name of the port there is Jeddah.

In the debate over Burma's oil, I think we agreed to leave the terrain and resource symbol where they are, but change the name from Yenanguang to Chauk (spelling?), as Yenanguang is actually down near where the word Irrawaddy is.

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 100
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 4:50:49 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline 		Would it be possible to pick an interesting area, say Berlin or Shanghai or some such and show the screen shot at all 8 levels of zoom?

Thanks,

_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 101
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 7:23:32 PM   
Incy

 

Posts: 336
Joined: 10/25/2003
Status: offline 		Kuwait seems way to big, unless the borders were different during WW2.
Map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ku-map.gif

How about changing these hexes to become saudi:
-desert SW of Kuwait
-desert W+W of Kuwait
-desert W + NW of Kuwait


(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 102
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/15/2008 8:42:10 PM   
Shannon V. OKeets

 

Posts: 22095
Joined: 5/19/2005
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sajbalk

Would it be possible to pick an interesting area, say Berlin or Shanghai or some such and show the screen shot at all 8 levels of zoom?

Thanks,

I just did that for you in another thread.

_____________________________

Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 103
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/18/2008 9:21:32 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Incy

Kuwait seems way to big, unless the borders were different during WW2.
Map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ku-map.gif

How about changing these hexes to become saudi:
-desert SW of Kuwait
-desert W+W of Kuwait
-desert W + NW of Kuwait

Your quoted map :


What you propose looks like that.
I must say that the distances and proportions and positions of the borders, especially the Iraqi one, seem better. Opinions ?




Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Froonp -- 7/18/2008 9:23:21 PM >

(in reply to Incy)
Post #: 104
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/18/2008 9:27:59 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

quote:

ORIGINAL: Incy

Kuwait seems way to big, unless the borders were different during WW2.
Map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ku-map.gif

How about changing these hexes to become saudi:
-desert SW of Kuwait
-desert W+W of Kuwait
-desert W + NW of Kuwait


What you propose looks like that.
I must say that the distances and proportions and positions of the borders, especially the Iraqi one, seem better. Opinions ?


I measured Kuwait on Google Earth, and it is about 170 km north-south and 170 km east-west, so maybe this new depiction is better.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 105
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/18/2008 9:51:34 PM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline 		I think the new Kuwait more closely resembles the historical country.

One interesting thing with the new map scale is that conquering Saudi Arabia, even against the puny 1-5 CAV is a 2 HQ operation for regular supply.



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 106
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/18/2008 10:43:47 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sajbalk

I think the new Kuwait more closely resembles the historical country.

One interesting thing with the new map scale is that conquering Saudi Arabia, even against the puny 1-5 CAV is a 2 HQ operation for regular supply.

I'm happy this kind of effect happens. Saudi Arabian is a hell of a large and hot country. At least, it seems so by looking at maps.

(in reply to sajbalk)
Post #: 107
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 12:24:02 AM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

I must say that the distances and proportions and positions of the borders, especially the Iraqi one, seem better. Opinions ?





New Kuwait looks better.

I have found another Middle East problem.

Iraq.

It is much too thin East>West. Look at it on google map and it becomes plain to see.

The problem is the 4 border mountain hexes in Persia that stick into Iraq east of Baghdad(you can see the southern 2 hexes on the north edge of Patrice's map above). They are wrong; one even touches the Tigris River. In reality the border of Persia is nowhere near the Tigris, it is over one hundred miles east. This problem most likely stems from the old "edge-of-the-map warped Iraq/Persia" that we had issues with before.

I propose that the 4 mountain hexes of Persia from the one that touches the Tigris north of Basra continuing 4 mountain hexes north along the border be changed to Iraq.

This would be far more accurate of a border.



< Message edited by Norman42 -- 7/19/2008 12:25:24 AM >

_____________________________

-------------

C.L.Norman

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 108
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 8:14:37 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42
I have found another Middle East problem.

Iraq.

It is much too thin East>West. Look at it on google map and it becomes plain to see.

The problem is the 4 border mountain hexes in Persia that stick into Iraq east of Baghdad(you can see the southern 2 hexes on the north edge of Patrice's map above). They are wrong; one even touches the Tigris River. In reality the border of Persia is nowhere near the Tigris, it is over one hundred miles east. This problem most likely stems from the old "edge-of-the-map warped Iraq/Persia" that we had issues with before.

I propose that the 4 mountain hexes of Persia from the one that touches the Tigris north of Basra continuing 4 mountain hexes north along the border be changed to Iraq.

This would be far more accurate of a border.

Iraq is a problem since the start, and I knew that it was slightly too narrow.

But I'm reluctant to change it too much because I fear that this would causes more problems eastwards.
The problem is that Iraq was in the middle of the European & Asia maps, so it was made up of a part in European map that was already distorded, and from an Asian part that is constrained by the rest of the Asia map. It is kind of a point of constriction that we can't avoid. If we touch Iraq too much, won't we need to touch Persia, and then Afghanistan, etc... I'm loathe to do this because it would also need to redraw rivers, lakes, even seas. So we need to be careful here.

Maybe I can only change the 2 southernmost mountains hexes to Persia ?
That would look good to me. See the attached map.




Compare it to that map :


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Froonp -- 7/19/2008 8:16:43 AM >

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 109
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 8:24:14 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline 		Problem is that, as you can see here :

The terrain is nowhere as mountanous in that eastern part of Iraq as we show it on the MWiF map now (post just above).
So we need to elimitate those 3 mountain hexes north of the Tigris, and the 3 alpine hexsides that go with them.

And now, if we do that, this is an hexrow less in the Zagros Mountains. Are they still well depicted ?

What terrain do we give those changed mountain hexes ? Desert ?

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 110
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 2:44:58 PM   
Sewerlobster


Posts: 330
Joined: 5/7/2007
From: Reading, Pa. USA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp
Problem is that, as you can see here : <Map Deleted by SewerStarFish>
The terrain is nowhere as mountanous in that eastern part of Iraq as we show it on the MWiF map now (post just above).
So we need to elimitate those 3 mountain hexes north of the Tigris, and the 3 alpine hexsides that go with them.
And now, if we do that, this is an hexrow less in the Zagros Mountains. Are they still well depicted ?
What terrain do we give those changed mountain hexes ? Desert ?

Looking at that map and MWif's I agree the three mountain hexes should go. And as Patrice's map depicts the area just west of the mountains as green and not tan, I'd lean toward open over desert; just like the hexes around the Nile. But I'd understand the choice of desert as an appropriate "ruggedness" for the terrain.


_____________________________

Why choose the lesser evil: Vote Cthulhu.

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 111
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 3:14:22 PM   
Orm


Posts: 22154
Joined: 5/3/2008
From: Sweden
Status: offline 		If I remember correctly each hex in MWIF is around 90 km. And with 90 km a hex I have no trouble with Tigris being close to Iran. Tigris looks to me to be about 30 km from the irianian border when it is closest. I would suggest redrawing Tigris so that it don't cross over into Iran.

I agree that Iraq looks way to narrow east - west. But to me it looks like a better solution to take a few hexes from Saudi Arabia.

According to the nice map it looks like several desert hexes should be change to Iraq from Saudi Arabia.

-Orm

(in reply to Sewerlobster)
Post #: 112
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 5:03:07 PM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Froonp

Maybe I can only change the 2 southernmost mountains hexes to Persia ?
That would look good to me. See the attached map.




Compare it to that map :




This looks better Patrice.

I do think those 2 hexes should be changed, and also make them not mountains anymore, perhaps desert instead.

Actually I'm not sure why the area between the Tigris and Euphrates river is desert. This is in reality a very lush area, fully irrigated and criss-crossed by small rivers. It's not called the Fertile Crescent for nothing!

I propose to change those 2 mountain hexes to desert, and the 4 desert hexes between the rivers to clear.


Edit: It wouldn't hurt to take a couple hexes from Saudi Arabia either, as Paul mentions above, to "fatten up" Iraq.




< Message edited by Norman42 -- 7/19/2008 5:04:25 PM >

_____________________________

-------------

C.L.Norman

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 113
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 5:14:33 PM   
Norman42


Posts: 244
Joined: 2/9/2008
From: Canada
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

15th in series - due east of the previous post.






Shouldn't the desert thats in Tibet/China be desert mountain?

Not that this area will ever, ever, ever see activity (if anyone ever gets a unit there, please post a pic!) but it does seem odd to have a small Sahara Desert in the Himalayas.


_____________________________

-------------

C.L.Norman

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 114
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 5:34:31 PM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Norman42
Shouldn't the desert thats in Tibet/China be desert mountain?

Not that this area will ever, ever, ever see activity (if anyone ever gets a unit there, please post a pic!) but it does seem odd to have a small Sahara Desert in the Himalayas.


I'm not suprised by such terrain here. I suppose this represents the desertic plateau of the Tibet highlands.
I've never been there, but I've seen pictures of tibets that makes me think those hexes are not wrong.

(in reply to Norman42)
Post #: 115
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 8:17:01 PM   
Plainian

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 9/22/2006
From: Dundee in Scotland
Status: offline 		Regarding Iraq if we are going to use the map picture to get a better representation of the country then I think we also have to adjust its other borders. If we use the rivers Euphrates and Tigris to guage things then I think we would need to move the borders as below?

Also in the map of the horn of Africa (Ethipoia/Somaliland/Aden - post 84 above?) why is the font for the label Italian Somaliland larger than British Somaliland? Can it be reduced to the same size?






Attachment (1)

(in reply to Shannon V. OKeets)
Post #: 116
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/19/2008 10:40:21 PM   
Plainian

 

Posts: 212
Joined: 9/22/2006
From: Dundee in Scotland
Status: offline 		Sorry but as usual I posted too hastily and did not check things properly. It is the FRENCH Somaliland label I think that needs reduced not the Italian one as I posted.


(in reply to Plainian)
Post #: 117
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/20/2008 1:05:38 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Plain Ian
Also in the map of the horn of Africa (Ethipoia/Somaliland/Aden - post 84 above?) why is the font for the label Italian Somaliland larger than British Somaliland? Can it be reduced to the same size?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Plain Ian
Sorry but as usual I posted too hastily and did not check things properly. It is the FRENCH Somaliland label I think that needs reduced not the Italian one as I posted.

British Somaliland is a Territory (WiF definition) and Italian Somaliland and French Somaliland are Minor Countries (WiF definition). Minor countries are all written with the same font, and Territories too, smaller than Territories. All is consistent here.

(in reply to Plainian)
Post #: 118
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/20/2008 1:08:21 AM   
Froonp


Posts: 7995
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Marseilles, France
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Plain Ian
Regarding Iraq if we are going to use the map picture to get a better representation of the country then I think we also have to adjust its other borders. If we use the rivers Euphrates and Tigris to guage things then I think we would need to move the borders as below?

I say your drawing is not that bad.
What do others think ?

(in reply to Plainian)
Post #: 119
RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma - 7/20/2008 3:35:13 AM   
sajbalk


Posts: 264
Joined: 7/11/2005
From: Davenport, Iowa
Status: offline 		I like the new, fatter Iraq, but I cannot see that it will make too much difference in the game. Also, no mountains should be next to the rivers. Finally, at least now, the area in between the 2 rives should not be desert. I would suggest normal terrain.

See http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/iraq/images/terrain.gif

Maybe some swamp, given the above site's concerns.

Also: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_physical_feat_2003.jpg

Finally: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_land_1978.jpg



_____________________________

Steve Balk
Iowa, USA

(in reply to Froonp)
Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> RE: MWiF Map Review - India & Burma Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.000