Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 4:58:14 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline
1/1/42 (turn 29)  More of the same for AGS with our forces slowly being pushed back.  At least we still hold Kiev!




_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 781
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 4:59:16 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline
It was a lot of fun presenting the game in this AAR and I know many of you enjoyed it as much as I did.  Stay tuned for more AAR's as we move the game along toward completion.

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 782
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 5:13:02 PM   
Zovs


Posts: 6668
Joined: 2/23/2009
From: United States
Status: offline
Lee challenging is where its at. Have you tried hard yet...

_____________________________


Beta Tester for:
Flashpoint Campaigns: Sudden Storm
War in the East 1 & 2
WarPlan & WarPlan Pacific
Valor & Victory
DG CWIE 2
SPWW2 & SPMBT scenario creator

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 783
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 5:25:14 PM   
wmcalpine

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
Lee,

The screenshot of AGC with FOW turned off was scary. A veritable sea of Soviet troops. Were many of those brigades or divisions?

Thank you for the very entertaining AAR.

Bill

(in reply to Zovs)
Post #: 784
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 6:09:55 PM   
The SNAFU


Posts: 48
Joined: 3/10/2010
Status: offline
Elmo,

Thanks for sharing this AAR and for the time and effort it took to do it. It must have been hard invading the Soviet Union when the rules of war were changed on you several times during the operation and you were asked to go back in time (no small feat indeed )

In any event, your AAR has provided us with a glimpse of what this game is and what it can be once it's complete.

< Message edited by The SNAFU -- 3/19/2010 6:10:17 PM >


_____________________________

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Winston Churchill

(in reply to wmcalpine)
Post #: 785
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 6:55:14 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wmcalpine

Lee,

The screenshot of AGC with FOW turned off was scary. A veritable sea of Soviet troops. Were many of those brigades or divisions?

Thank you for the very entertaining AAR.

Bill



A lot of those were brigades, probably too many. We're looking into that. Glad you liked the AAR.

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to wmcalpine)
Post #: 786
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 7:34:50 PM   
pejsek

 

Posts: 29
Joined: 10/6/2009
Status: offline
Thank you for this AAR. It was very interesting reading. I am looking forward to this game.

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 787
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 7:43:31 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
Thanks for the AAR elmo, I'm looking forward to the next one.

It does seem the AI might take defending cities a bit too seriously, as there are plenty of units near or in Moscow, whilst the danger of a German breakthrough was pretty minimal. Of course, it's possible they arrived by rail, but there are other places where there are AI units in the rear in some weird locations.

(in reply to pejsek)
Post #: 788
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 8:13:45 PM   
Naughteous Maximus


Posts: 301
Joined: 3/9/2010
From: Los Angeles, California
Status: offline
Someone looks like they will be facing the "firing squad" real soon.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 789
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 9:20:54 PM   
critter


Posts: 139
Joined: 3/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: elmo3

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zort

It looks like your fort units have not done as well as expected. Wonder if the soviet losses will be so bad that they will falter in 42?


The fortified zone units were disappointing, as Joel predicted. I wonder if we'll still have an army at all in '42?

Thanks for the AAR
Elmo whats your take on the fortfied zones? Worthless? What do you think their next evolution will be? Aren't they supposed to represent heg hogs?
As per ComradeP Q, what did the soviet rear area look like? Was the AI shipping its units to the front?

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 790
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 9:41:44 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: critter

Thanks for the AAR
Elmo whats your take on the fortfied zones? Worthless? What do you think their next evolution will be? Aren't they supposed to represent heg hogs?
As per ComradeP Q, what did the soviet rear area look like? Was the AI shipping its units to the front?


The fortified regions are really special static combat units designed to help with fortification construction, supplement line units while building defenses, and allow the allocation of more support units (directly attached) for defense. They are not worthless, it's just that I'm not sure how to use them effectively yet.

The vast majority of Soviet units were near the front lines. There were a few armies forming in the rear areas but they had pretty much all their forces within 100-200 miles of the front line.


_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to critter)
Post #: 791
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 9:48:41 PM   
freeboy

 

Posts: 9088
Joined: 5/16/2004
From: Colorado
Status: offline
great aar, definately a a tempting taste of the main course yet to come

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 792
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 10:06:00 PM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline
In 41 the things to remember are...Be very agressive in good weather, and chew up as many troops as you can. When mud hits, shorten the lines and dig in. Then pray...lol...I focus on Leningrad in 41, the Finns are joined and the Baltic sea is now yours. In 42 Moscow, and once it falls so goes the house of cards...Why Hitler called off the attack on Leningrad in 41 I'll never know...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 793
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 10:23:07 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
quote:

Aren't they supposed to represent heg hogs?


Hedgehogs are defensive formations that are strong in the sense that all sides are protected by an equal amount of force, but when that line is broken at one point, you're in trouble. It's a nice defensive strategy when you're surrounded, but it has many disadvantages.

quote:

The fortified regions are really special static combat units designed to help with fortification construction, supplement line units while building defenses, and allow the allocation of more support units (directly attached) for defense. They are not worthless, it's just that I'm not sure how to use them effectively yet.


As Joel posted earlier:
quote:

Just to be clear, a fortified zone is not a fort. It is a unit, that contains around 2000k, of which 270 are labor. The rest are about 2 companies of men and support troops. That's when they are up to full strength. They will help increase the fortification level of the hex (because like all troops they will dig), but not by a bunch. Units adjacent to the enemy dig less than those in the rear (since they can't spend all their time digging but have to worry about the enemy).


I guess if you give them time, and establish them some distance away from the front, the labourers will do a pretty good job of creating defensives. I think the key word is "time". In your case their effectiveness was limited as there was little time and you created so many of them that some units might not have been up to strength to begin with.

I seem to recall it was discussed earlier, but can't recall the specifics: what happens to forts over time? Let's say you establish some forts with fortified region/zone units, and disband those units, but place a regular up-to-strength infantry unit in the hex. Will that unit be enough to keep the forts up to strength or do they decrease in size over time until a construction battalion is in the hex?

(in reply to PyleDriver)
Post #: 794
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/19/2010 10:41:45 PM   
Smirfy

 

Posts: 1057
Joined: 7/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Why Hitler called off the attack on Leningrad in 41 I'll never know...


In general staff circles it was said he found an old memorandum of Lundendorff's which dwelt on the difficulty of provisioning large cities. Personally I believe the reasons that drew him to Stalingrad in 42 repelled him at Leningrad in 41. And great AAR by the way Elmo.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 795
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 12:19:09 AM   
zbig

 

Posts: 44
Joined: 3/3/2010
Status: offline
Thank you for the AAR, it was fun to watch. In the immortal words of General "Buck" Turgidson:

"Mr. President, if I may speak freely, the Russkie talks big, but frankly, we think he's short of know how. I mean, you just can't expect a bunch of ignorant peons to understand a machine like some of our boys. And that's not meant as an insult, Mr. Ambassador, I mean, you take your average Russkie, we all know how much guts he's got. Hell, lookit look at all them them Nazis killed off and they still wouldn't quit."

I do not know if that is relevant but I always wanted to use that quote.

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 796
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 12:46:53 AM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline
A classic movie.  

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to zbig)
Post #: 797
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 4:00:30 AM   
Lokos

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 6/5/2004
Status: offline
'Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!'

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 798
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 4:58:39 AM   
wmcalpine

 

Posts: 131
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
One of my favorites

"If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally sharp, he can barrel that baby in so low... oh you oughta see it sometime. It's a sight. A big plane like a '52... varrrooom! Its jet exhaust... frying chickens in the barnyard!"

What a great movie



(in reply to Lokos)
Post #: 799
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 6:07:25 AM   
oldman45


Posts: 2320
Joined: 5/1/2005
From: Jacksonville Fl
Status: offline
Thanks for putting the AAR together and taking the time to share it with us.

_____________________________


(in reply to wmcalpine)
Post #: 800
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 6:07:40 AM   
Captain B


Posts: 386
Joined: 8/30/2009
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Status: offline
Elmo aka Lee,

Well done indeed! So, if Napoleon came out with only a handful, I think you making it out with a heck of a lot more means you might be a better general than little nappy. But I am afraid the Gestapo will find that you shot yourself at some point for your failure to win a complete and total victory. I still say do the Scooby Doo ending and go back to your saved game and burn Moscow to the ground.

A couple of items...are you going to send the designers some notes with your observations? it would be interesting to see them as part of this AAR. Looks like the forts didn't do well enough and it appears to me that the soviets appeared to have way too much coordination in their counterattack during the blizzard and during their whole defesne. In 1941 the soviet command structure was poor and improved steadily throughout the war (mostly due to the school of hard knocks in 1941). Also, did the blizzard affect the soviet at all? Having been on an ARTEP during a blizzard in Germany (in modern tanks mind you), you cannot operate at any level of efficiency and coordination. May need to be an increase in the modifier for the soviets movement as well during blizzard? Don't know, guess you will find out in your next round!

Viel Gluck!



_____________________________

There is no problem too big that can't be solved with the proper use of high explosives

WITE Scenario Tester
WITW Beta Tester

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 801
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 6:21:47 AM   
PyleDriver


Posts: 6152
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas
Status: offline
Well Lee has done a great job showing the game. And why even at alpha testing now, you will be tested at this game after you get it. Granted he made mistakes, as we all do, and they did in the war... Ah, but thats we replay the game, we love to think we could do better...

_____________________________

Jon Pyle
AWD Beta tester
WBTS Alpha tester
WitE Alpha tester
WitW Alpha tester
WitE2 Alpha tester

(in reply to Captain B)
Post #: 802
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 10:57:24 AM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Captain B

Elmo aka Lee,

...

A couple of items...are you going to send the designers some notes with your observations? ... Also, did the blizzard affect the soviet at all? Having been on an ARTEP during a blizzard in Germany (in modern tanks mind you), you cannot operate at any level of efficiency and coordination. May need to be an increase in the modifier for the soviets movement as well during blizzard? Don't know, guess you will find out in your next round!

Viel Gluck!




Yes I have been discussing the AAR with the team along the way and Joel was following it. The Soviets were well prepared for winter and don't suffer any negative effects other than the standard movement penalties for bad weather. As with just about everything in alpha this could be adjusted after looking at test results.

Glad you liked the AAR.


_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to Captain B)
Post #: 803
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 11:48:34 AM   
Banzan

 

Posts: 288
Joined: 3/13/2010
From: Bremen, Germany
Status: offline
Very nice AAR (as i already said before), but nobody seems to ask the really important question:

When do you start the next one ? :D

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 804
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 12:49:05 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline
I'll be bug hunting for a while so maybe one of the other testers will get one going eventually.  And we'll probably have a PBEM style AAR between two players once that gets implemented.

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to Banzan)
Post #: 805
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 2:33:46 PM   
SGHunt


Posts: 873
Joined: 1/20/2010
From: Lancaster, England
Status: offline
OK - so I was wrong about AGC not being destroyed!   My apologies to those with greater experience who predicted that the Bear would bite your head off.

This has been great fun - and may thanks.   I don't know what I'll do to distract myself from working now!   It's also been really interesting and has me hungry for more - both more testing insights and for the thing itself.   I don't think I'll be able resist micro managing those support units.

I'm still intrigued to know about digging in - not so much the fortified regions, which I think someone said should ideally be set up behind the front line as a switch line.   It's the infantry flanks of AGC that were only at level 1 entrenchment when the big bad thing started, despite being static for several weeks.   Do you need to order them to dig in or does it happen naturally, as it were?   And why no gradual increase in level?    Static units would naturally move from fox holes,to simple trenches, to more elaborate trench systems with wooden bunkers and wire, with mines etc without a great deal of extra resource from HQ, wouldn't they?   And the troops would 'find' stuff to keep them warm, improvise stoves in the bunkers and shelters etc and would fight like hell to stop being driven into the howling wastes....Many tactical battles were fought for the posession of shelter,,with death to the losers.  

It seemed to me that your line regiments got kicked out of their 'prepared' positions too easily.     (No problem if they were only in the rudimentary defence positions just off the march).   What do you think?

Thanks again
Stuart


_____________________________

Stuart 'von Jaeger' Hunt

WitE Alpha, Beta Tester


(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 806
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 2:49:29 PM   
wiking62


Posts: 141
Joined: 3/30/2006
From: England
Status: offline
Thanks for a great AAR Lee. It has provided us all with a really good insight into the game mechanics etc.


(in reply to SGHunt)
Post #: 807
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 3:49:09 PM   
elmo3

 

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: von Jaeger

...Do you need to order them to dig in or does it happen naturally, as it were?   And why no gradual increase in level?    ...What do you think?

Thanks again
Stuart



Fortifications do increase gradually over time and you don't order units to dig in. There are many factors involved for example: unit experience and fatigue, any available engineers, proximity of the enemy (being adjacent really slows the process), the current fort level of the hex (as it goes up it takes longer to build the next level), availability of city labor, terrain (max level is 3 in swamp). There are probably other factors but hopefully that gives you an idea of what is involved.


_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to SGHunt)
Post #: 808
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 4:51:49 PM   
ComradeP

 

Posts: 7192
Joined: 9/17/2009
Status: offline
The Soviets did seem to be quite strong suddenly in winter, even though the average Rifle division still only had an attack strength of 2 according to the screenshots. German defensive strength didn't really seem to have much of an impact.

Your reserve, like that Panzer division in Smolensk, also didn't seem to do anything at all, whilst the Soviets were not really troubled by the winter.

The effectiveness of Rifle formations might be too high in the blizzard. Even if they had adequate winter gear (which is a big if considering the state Soviet logistics were in at the end of 1941, and considering that in the Winter War frostbite casualties were fairly serious), their tactical doctrine (or lack thereof I should say) would still quickly nullify an relative increase in strength due to having that winter equipment. The Germans might be freezing, but they still have a solid operational and tactical doctrine. The Soviets, even though not freezing, wouldn't suddenly become expert tacticians. For example, the Soviet way of removing Germans from a village was to send groups of men out to literally stamp a path into the snow towards the German-held village (predictably, casualties were horrible in those groups), human-waving to reach the village and then cleaning the village house by house.

Considering that most of elmo's formations were in a much better shape than their historical counterparts if the casualty figures are an indication, Soviet effectiveness against almost full strength German formations might be too high currently.

(in reply to elmo3)
Post #: 809
RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR - 3/20/2010 6:37:02 PM   
Wild


Posts: 364
Joined: 12/10/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ComradeP

The Soviets did seem to be quite strong suddenly in winter, even though the average Rifle division still only had an attack strength of 2 according to the screenshots. German defensive strength didn't really seem to have much of an impact.

Your reserve, like that Panzer division in Smolensk, also didn't seem to do anything at all, whilst the Soviets were not really troubled by the winter.

The effectiveness of Rifle formations might be too high in the blizzard. Even if they had adequate winter gear (which is a big if considering the state Soviet logistics were in at the end of 1941, and considering that in the Winter War frostbite casualties were fairly serious), their tactical doctrine (or lack thereof I should say) would still quickly nullify an relative increase in strength due to having that winter equipment. The Germans might be freezing, but they still have a solid operational and tactical doctrine. The Soviets, even though not freezing, wouldn't suddenly become expert tacticians. For example, the Soviet way of removing Germans from a village was to send groups of men out to literally stamp a path into the snow towards the German-held village (predictably, casualties were horrible in those groups), human-waving to reach the village and then cleaning the village house by house.

Considering that most of elmo's formations were in a much better shape than their historical counterparts if the casualty figures are an indication, Soviet effectiveness against almost full strength German formations might be too high currently.


He was playing on the challenging difficulty level, not historical. It is hard to make too many assumptions from this.

(in reply to ComradeP)
Post #: 810
Page:   <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Gary Grigsby's War in the East Series >> After Action Reports >> RE: Operation Barbarossa - Alpha AAR Page: <<   < prev  25 26 [27] 28 29   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.078