RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot

Matrix Games Forums

Forums Register Login Photo Gallery Member List Search Calendars FAQ

My Profile Inbox Address Book My Subscription My Forums Log Out

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

Users viewing this topic: none

Printable Version

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Distant Worlds 1 Series >> RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 1:52:38 AM

Krafty

Posts: 395
Joined: 3/26/2010
Status: offline

I think it works fine. As far as I can tell automated ships go about their business refueling themselves, in invasions ive had plenty of luck with resupply ships (had to redesign the default one to let in bigger ships with more docking bays, couldnt fit to refuel) also the default designs are really bad on fuel usage, theyre heavy, have 5-6 engines, and only 2 fuel bays...I quickly in a large game or if I have long distance between colonies/free trade partners, add up to 5 fuel storage, for the long journeys.

Im trying to figure out what the energy collectors do? I cant not use a fission reactor, cant save the design with errors, and why make excess energy?

(in reply to jfpOne23)

Post #: 31

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 1:54:54 AM

EisenHammer

Posts: 440
Joined: 9/1/2008
Status: offline

I agree with Ashbery76... the game needs an auto refuel option and slower fuel consumption.

(in reply to jfpOne23)

Post #: 32

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 2:05:06 AM

theonlystd

Posts: 74
Joined: 6/8/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jfpOne23

I wasn't saying to eliminate supply. I also have a love/hate relationship with the well implemented logistical side of war gaming. And I agree that it's very rewarding to manage a "Fleet on the Move" better than your opponent does. And see the effects of careful stockpiling and planning.

I'm just saying, turn it on, or turn it off as you wish. Simple really. Make it an option like how many star systems you want or how many species in your particular customizations at game start.

If they do that then they'll have to mess with the AI so it puts up a competitive game and such.

Since their would be no restraints on how far you can attack and on your fleet sizes. The ai would need to use a totally different kind of tactics.

< Message edited by theonlystd -- 3/30/2010 2:11:01 AM >

(in reply to jfpOne23)

Post #: 33

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 2:10:01 AM

cobra13

Posts: 18
Joined: 3/28/2010
Status: offline

Another vote for auto refuel or the ability for auto refuel to work properly. IE if there were a option to auto refuel fleets it would be perfect. You would still be command of the fleets as the Admiral but the lower grade officers are taking care of refuel and resupply.

(in reply to Krafty)

Post #: 34

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 2:45:24 AM

mllange

Posts: 527
Joined: 2/5/2005
Status: offline

You have to remember there are two different types of fuel required (depending on the engine tech of the ship design). I once made the mistake of deploying my refueller on a gas giant that didn't have the right resource type of fuel - the result of course was that the refueller couldn't resupply my fleet (or itself) and it ended up un-deploying and moving away to refuel. That might be part of the issue here.

That said, I agree with the original post in most aspects, it is a management hassle as the game progresses. I really dislike the fact that fleets don't work well if they aren't automated. Automated fleets seem to form and then sit without engaging, and then fight one battle and promptly disband. I just haven't had much success employing them. I would prefer the ability to create fleets and then provide them with orders that they would carry out. Right now if you provide manual orders to a fleet it is very hit or miss as to whether they will carry them out.

_____________________________

There's a simple answer to every complex question - and it's wrong.
-Umberto Eco

(in reply to cobra13)

Post #: 35

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 3:02:28 AM

JaguarUSF

Posts: 261
Joined: 7/31/2003
From: Jacksonville, FL
Status: offline

It took me a couple of games to figure out what to do, but I have two manually controlled fleets (AI Fleet Organization is off, and automate is off for each and every ship assigned to these two fleets) that I use for invasions/defense, about 50% of my total military (everyone else is on automate). I deploy a reupply ship to a gas giant near the area of interest, refuel everybody at the deployed ship, and then alternate attacks using my two fleets. If you want to manually control ships, you have to turn automation off and refuel yourself. A helpful tip is right-clicking on any ship in a fleet and choosing the "refuel nearest" command.

< Message edited by JaguarUSF -- 3/30/2010 3:03:48 AM >

(in reply to mllange)

Post #: 36

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 3:18:43 AM

lancer

Posts: 2963
Joined: 10/18/2005
Status: offline

Goodaye,

I find that the long range strike / resupply / fuel usage model that the game presents to you is pretty good and very reminiscent of WW2 in the Pacific as noted elsewhere.

Once you get the hang of it it's a lot of fun and very satisfying. Dumbing it down would be a mistake as it's one of the strong points of the game.

However I can see that it's an area prone to misunderstandings. Lots of people who buy this game probably haven't had to deal with any of this type of stuff before and hence a lot of confusion and complaints that the system is 'broken'.

Perhaps a short 'how-to-guide' would help to cut down on the confusion and also highlight another aspect of the game.

Cheers,
Lancer

(in reply to JaguarUSF)

Post #: 37

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 6:16:16 AM

VarekRaith

Posts: 138
Joined: 2/21/2010
From: Manassas, Virginia
Status: offline

Auto-fuel option for manually controlled ships would be welcome. However, I do not want fuel consumption of ships to be altered, as that would make fuel rather meaningless...

(in reply to jfpOne23)

Post #: 38

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 6:30:30 AM

Wade1000

Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

If you have manual control over the fleet, it should not be disbanded, that should only happen if the fleet formation is automated as well.

Are you using resupply ships with your fleets? I'm able to launch some pretty deep strikes without a problem when using resupply. One thing about DW though is that it is supposed to be hard to send your fleet across the galaxy and support it. It's easy to defend your own area, harder to plan and support an attack elsewhere.

I agree with that. That's part of why it's called "Distant" Worlds. Attacking a far away empire should be very logistcal involved, though, not frustrating in a game. Everything in a game should be balanced also without forgetting about fun factor.

I agree with auto refuel for ships manually controlled. Perhaps, also, tweaking the overall fuel consumption rate a bit, not drastically of course. Maybe, the developers would have the best idea for that part.

_____________________________

Wish list:population centers beyond planetary(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Culture):Ships,Ring Orbitals,Sphere Orbitals,Ringworlds,Sphereworlds;ability to create & destroy planets,population centers,stars;AI competently using all advances & features.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 39

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 6:58:58 AM

mllange

Posts: 527
Joined: 2/5/2005
Status: offline

Tonight I created a support/staging collier (refueller & resupply) ship to support my attack fleet. I checked all of the engine types for the ship designs in my attack fleet to ensure they all required hydrogen for fuel - check! I then double-checked my collier ship to ensure it's engine type required hydrogen for fuel - check! Finally, I picked out a nice hydrogen gas giant cloud 2/3rds of the way toward the pirate base I planned to destroy and ordered my collier ship to deploy at the hydrogen gas giant cloud. The collier ship traveled to the cloud, reduced engines to impulse power and crawled toward the center of the cloud to deploy... and then promptly changed it's order to 'refuel at Planet XXX' and started back out of the hydrogen gas giant cloud moving toward Planet XXX. Argh! I tried to change the ship's order back to deploy several times to no avail. The best laid plans of mice and men... After some time the collier ship ran completely out of fuel on it's way to Planet XXX and was basically stuck in space moving at less than impulse power, a sitting duck.

_____________________________

There's a simple answer to every complex question - and it's wrong.
-Umberto Eco

(in reply to Wade1000)

Post #: 40

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 9:28:52 AM

sbach2o

Posts: 378
Joined: 3/26/2010
Status: offline

I think the concept of having to care for the supply of our ships is fine. But the tools we have at hand for accomplishing this task are inadequate.

There is just nothing below the level of these cumbersome resupply ships that need to be deployed at a fuel source to be effective. The fact that there are two(?) kinds of fuel doesn't make things easier.

One problem with these resupply ships is that they carry not enough fuel for themselves, unless the default design is tweaked accordingly.

But what is really missing, is a class of fuel tanker ship that isn't at all designed to mine fuel, but just carry that stuff around between your refueling sources and your war fleets. Consequently, these ships shouldn't belong to the private sector. Their typical use would be to assign them to fleets (or individual ships) with an order of 'keep these supplied', having access to their own storage should give them an enormous range. With that they would constantly travel between that fleet and the nearest fuel source to do just that.

Tankers left on automation could look on their own for ships in range (state or privately contolled alike) that are low on fuel or stranded and refuel these.

< Message edited by sbach2o -- 3/30/2010 9:29:30 AM >

(in reply to mllange)

Post #: 41

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 9:51:14 AM

Okim

Posts: 209
Joined: 1/29/2010
From: Russian Federation
Status: offline

You know, after a couple of days of playing i was able to adapt to manual fleet control and manual refuelling. While i do not use resupply ships at all (they behave strange and always disobey my strict manual orders to deploy preferring to return to the nearest gas station instead) - i use a small support fleet of 3 constructors that travels alongside my fleets and establishes 1 gas mine and some times defence stations once the systems is cleared of all enemy presence. The spare constructors provide a in-field repair support to those ships that were badly damaged.

This is a complex tactic and it only works well when you carefully plan your invasion (picking systems with carson gas as high-priority targets). After such a resupply point is created it is much easier to conduct further invasions into enemy territories as you have already established a good base of operations within his empire.

The only thing that you should take into account is that you need to position your constructors close to your colonies and give constructor orders while remaining there. Your constructors might need to load required materials for your bases and will travel to the nearest space port even if they are already in their construction site`s system.

(in reply to sbach2o)

Post #: 42

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 10:48:18 AM

Kumppi

Posts: 209
Joined: 10/21/2008
From: Somewhere between Sweden and Russia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins

Are you using resupply ships with your fleets? I'm able to launch some pretty deep strikes without a problem when using resupply. One thing about DW though is that it is supposed to be hard to send your fleet across the galaxy and support it. It's easy to defend your own area, harder to plan and support an attack elsewhere.

I love the fuel aspect in the game and would hate to see it go. AI definitely needs some help with it at the moment, but please don't remove it. Perhaps people need to adjust more to the fact that in this game you just can't send your fleets where ever you like without thinking logistics first. Then again I do enjoy WITP AE so perhaps its just me.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 43

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 12:55:16 PM

Gertjan

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline

I agree with all the persons who argue in favour of keeping the fuel/logistics/limited range aspect of the game. However, it needs to be improved to be more manageable and take less micromanagement. Galciv2 indeed had a nice way of circumventing it with a limited range for ships. Although on smaller maps it didnt make a lot of difference.

(in reply to Kumppi)

Post #: 44

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 1:21:49 PM

Hyfrydle

Posts: 75
Joined: 3/22/2010
Status: offline

I also think the fuel system should stay. Maybe we need a better understanding of how it actually works from the dev's or beta testers. I have come to realise that tactics used in other 4X games don't work in DW.

(in reply to Gertjan)

Post #: 45

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 1:30:05 PM

elmo3

Posts: 5820
Joined: 1/22/2002
Status: offline

FWIW I agree fuel should stay. If refueling ships would stay on station and refuel themselves (assuming they are at a gas giant) then most of the problems would be solved.

_____________________________

We don't stop playing because we grow old, we grow old because we stop playing. - George Bernard Shaw

WitE alpha/beta tester
Sanctus Reach beta tester
Desert War 1940-42 beta tester

(in reply to Hyfrydle)

Post #: 46

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 1:44:38 PM

malkuth74

Posts: 115
Joined: 3/27/2010
Status: offline

1.So far Keep the fuel system.

2. Fix suppliers for they work right (suppliers should not have to run back for fuel when they are making it lol)

3. Make it so that ships that sit at idle don't consume fuel. (this is what brings on the huge amount of micromanagment.

4. Maker sure if Auto AI is on that it does some sort of check and refuels its ships before going on an attack run.

If you address these 4 things I think the system will work a lot better.

(number 2 is the most important, I think that one is what is pissing most of us off, oh and the fact that ships use fuel when idle.)

(in reply to elmo3)

Post #: 47

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 3:53:26 PM

Erik Rutins

Posts: 37503
Joined: 3/28/2000
From: Vermont, USA
Status: offline

Hi guys,

Some good suggestions and discussion here. We will work to improve how fuel/resupply operations are handled to make this. Agree in general with the four points above, though regarding #3 I think there are ways around this now and I'm not sure they should consume no fuel at all.

Regards,

- Erik

_____________________________

Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.

(in reply to malkuth74)

Post #: 48

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 4:03:33 PM

mbar

Posts: 492
Joined: 3/17/2010
Status: offline

Considering the DW universe is open and not constrained by star lanes and a ship can go anywhere, a fuel system needs to stay.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 49

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/30/2010 5:05:32 PM

Wade1000

Posts: 771
Joined: 10/27/2009
From: California, USA
Status: offline

-Maybe a very high later technology could be a ship module that produces unlimited fuel thus eliminating the need to refuel. It could be very large and/or expensive. Maybe it could only fit on an bare neccesities large ship or supply ship.

_____________________________

(in reply to mbar)

Post #: 50

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 8:30:29 AM

forsaken1111

Posts: 281
Joined: 3/30/2010
Status: offline

So can resupply ships not deploy to a gas giant which is already being mined? I wanted to strike an enemy territory so I sent a resupply ship to my own system a short distance away and tried to deploy it on a gas giant. The only gas giant there already had a civilian mining station on it. When I told it to deploy, it flew over to the gas giant and sat next to it doing nothing. Eventually (since ships burn fuel even when not moving) it ran out of fuel and the next time I told it to deploy it ran off to a base to refuel. Agh...

(in reply to Wade1000)

Post #: 51

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 10:42:55 AM

Gertjan

Posts: 698
Joined: 12/9/2009
Status: offline

I think it can actually.

(in reply to forsaken1111)

Post #: 52

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 11:24:33 AM

Hyfrydle

Posts: 75
Joined: 3/22/2010
Status: offline

In my current game it has become impossible to micromanage fleets etc and I'm relying on the automation to fight the war I've found myself in. The enemy ships seem to have a higher shield tech but I have better weapons so the military strength is about equal. I have built and automated numerous resupply ships and they just sit idle doing nothing as far as I can see although I did spot the enemy setting up a forward base in my territory.

The battles are very chaotic and as empires grow become difficult to plan. I'm just watching and expanding at the moment waiting to see how things pan out.

(in reply to Gertjan)

Post #: 53

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 12:21:08 PM

forsaken1111

Posts: 281
Joined: 3/30/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
I'm not sure they should consume no fuel at all.

Why? If a ship is at a planet it can orbit the planet. If a ship is in deep space, it doesn't need to expend fuel to fight any gravity well.

I don't really understand what is going on behind the scenes. If you can explain a bit maybe we can suggest ways to tweak it. Like when a ship is idle, do the reactors still consume fuel to produce energy at their fullest? Do they 'spin down' to only produce what is necessary for the non-engine components?

If these ships are anything like our own space shuttle or most sci-fi ships, then the engines should be a huge chunk of the power draw. The closest analogy I can think of would be a naval ship, especially something like a nuclear submarine. They can operate for very long periods without refueling, especially if they keep maneuvering to a minimum.

Are the shields a constant power draw, consuming fuel at all times? Some games have shields which draw minimal power so long as they are already 'full' and only draw large amounts of power when they are recharging, for example.

(in reply to Erik Rutins)

Post #: 54

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 12:35:30 PM

tuser

Posts: 29
Joined: 3/31/2010
Status: offline

On the design screen you can see the static energy usage. It's usually pretty low and comes from sensor equipment etc. The ship will use that much energy even if not moving. Now if you take a look at reactor stats you'll see it has an efficiency rating, like "5.71 fuel units per 1000 energy units", with higher tech reactors being more efficient. So the reactor will have to burn a little fuel in order to satisfy the ship's static energy demand, even if idle. And that's where energy collectors come in, by the way. If you want stationary bases/ships to avoid burning any fuel you can use those, but hardly an option for most ships of course.

(in reply to forsaken1111)

Post #: 55

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 12:53:57 PM

Litjan

Posts: 221
Joined: 3/27/2010
From: Butzbach, Germany
Status: offline

Yes, I also think it is "realistic" to use a little fuel while sitting still. Consider it using supplies, like food, spare parts and such.

I have to try if fitting solar panels will stop fuel consumption when stopped. Has anyone tried that?

Can�t the fleet take a constructor along to setup a mining base at a fuel planet? I think I have seen ships refuel at those (instead of supply-ship).

I think once amassed in a fleet, all ships should drain from a common fuel-supply, this would simulate transferring fuel from full to almost empty ships.

Last but not least if would be cool to have the whole fleet be able to "dock" (or connect) to a supply ship (once they actually work) to remain topped of and ready to go - kinda like an aircraft using a ground-power-unit and fuel tanker-truck.

Jan

(in reply to tuser)

Post #: 56

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 1:48:20 PM

Mad Russian

Posts: 13256
Joined: 3/16/2008
From: Texas
Status: offline

Maybe a way to tell if your ships have enough fuel on board to get to the destinations you have ordered them to deploy to would be worthwhile. It seems like too many ships are being sent on missions they can't accomplish because they don't have the fuel for it. In a real world situation if that happened heads would roll.

So, I'm wondering if there could be a warning or something added when I issue orders for ships that will take them beyond where they can operate. Let's get rid of the blindly obeying robots in the nav chair and put some rationally thinking beings that can figure out, "Hey, we can't make it there with our current fuel."

Good Hunting.

MR

_____________________________

The most expensive thing in the world is free time.

Founder of HSG scenario design group for Combat Mission.
Panzer Command Ostfront Development Team.
Flashpoint Campaigns: Red Storm Development Team.

(in reply to Litjan)

Post #: 57

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 3/31/2010 2:25:41 PM

Hyfrydle

Posts: 75
Joined: 3/22/2010
Status: offline

Surely the automation should take this into account and only plan missions if they can actually carry them out. When un-automated the range is shown as a circle when a unit is selected.

(in reply to Mad Russian)

Post #: 58

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 4/5/2010 7:44:45 AM

marc420

Posts: 224
Joined: 9/23/2002
From: Terrapin Station
Status: offline

Some of what could improve fuel in the game involves the UI.

-- Ship range should show the circle at 'point of no return' instead of dry tanks.� Ie, 50% of what's now.

-- When trying to give a ships orders, the AI should let you know if its beyond the point of no return.� Most missions should stay inside of this to avoid having empty ships sitting dead on the map.� Sending a ship beyond this should be a big deal.� Its usually either a suicide mission for the ship, or some sort of hail mary where you send a ship then say 'don't worry, we'll get supplies to you'.� Either way, it should be very noticeable that you are doing this.

(Logic in the code could maybe take a move order's destination and then check it for 'nearest refueling' then ask if the fuel that's expected to be on board the ship when it arrives at its destination is enough to get it back to the 'nearest refueling'. If no, then either block the move or make the player go through a 'are you sure?' box to do it.)

-- Ships should automatically head for refueling base when they reach 'point of no return' fuel levels.� Then they should automatically return to their patrol point or whatever their previous position/mission was.� Captains of naval ships would always break off a mission when fuel levels dictated.� Its hard to imagine that a space ship captain would just let his ship run out of fuel and float dead in space.� When the fuel gage says 'head to port', they'll head for port.
�� --� Ideally a 'fleet' would organize itself such that if it was supposed to both 'patrol' or 'escort' something, but also refuel, that it would send back its units on a rotation.� Ie, four destroyers are on patrol.� One at any given time is probably back at base being refueled.� So, if you put a 'fleet' on patrol instead of individual ships, then the commander (and staff) of the fleet is 'managing' the refueling while keeping a force on station.� If you put individual ships on the same mission, then each just refuels when it has to do so.

-- Ships patrolling at a refueling point should be able to manage to keep themselves topped off or close to it.� Its strange to me to go to my home fleet to want to grab some ships to respond, only to find out that they are sitting empty on fuel.� Maybe the game needs a concept of something different than 'patrolling' to stay near a point.� What I want is to keep a fleet ready for action, and if I've done this at a base that can refuel, then I expect they'll be fueled and ready for action when I need them.� If there's a separate 'in port' command for putting ships in such a ready status at a base, then maybe that's what's needed.� But my reserve of big ships 'in port' at a refueling base, but then maybe have some small craft 'patrolling' around it.

-- The 'resupply' ships that set up a base that makes fuel are a good idea.� But the game also needs the concept of 'tankers' or 'oilers' or 'colliers'.� Put them in a fleet, and they automatically keep everyone topped up.� And the game needs a 'tanker' mission/role for ships where ships who need to 'refuel at nearest' can spot the tanker and head for it instead of a base.� The game needs tankers!

By all means keep the fuel system in the game.� But some UI help would be greatly appreciated.� :)

_____________________________

Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism. ~George Washington

(in reply to Hyfrydle)

Post #: 59

RE: Battles Need A Lot Of Work A lot - 4/5/2010 10:07:15 AM

Fishman

Posts: 795
Joined: 4/1/2010
Status: offline

I think the problem with the fuel issues stems from the design of your ships. Because I find that ships I didn't design always have massive fuel issues and are constantly out of fuel anytime you stop watching them, but the ships I made function like veritable energizer bunnies and always have predictable fuelling states.

(in reply to jfpOne23)

Post #: 60