Symon
Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012 From: De Eye-lands, Mon Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lecivius quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy I wonder if the 'background check' is a bogus catch-all HR-speak explanation used for discrimination for things that you're not supposed to discriminate against. That's my thinking. I guess I could go back to driving truck, but then I will have no time to hang out here I think CB has the right of it. ‘Security clearances’ are vetted (high end, but still ..) to ensure you are not now, or don’t have some issue that will let you be, later, a risk for the security of the stuff you are cleared for. Obviously didn’t work too well in the case of the Snowdens out there. But commercial HR don’t know jack-all about jack-$hit. They are the bottom of the corporate food chain. It’s where the Director of Facilities Management can get a place for his cretin nephew. Commercial HR has no standards, and there is no recourse. Even if you are God, some little HR weenie is gonna think your beard is a problem, so thanks for your interest and we’ll get back to you. Just FYI, I have had people like you, along with your recruiter, push back against the REMFs, if they really wanted the position. Up to you, though. [ed] it is possible that you are perhaps too European or too male for them to meet their EEOC standards, just now. HR folks look at that a lot; just thinking. Ciao. JWE
< Message edited by Symon -- 8/14/2013 7:01:17 PM >
_____________________________
Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie! Yippy Ki Yay.
|