Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A)

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) Page: <<   < prev  31 32 [33] 34 35   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/15/2016 4:17:19 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
16-17 November, 1943


SW PAC: Joseph sent in some sweeps down here for the first time since taking the game over. Looks like he's about to start taking some steps to get moving.

On the 17th he sent in a bunch of P-38H groups with a few Kittyhawk III to Madang. I had a low CAP set, although not in the three step layering at 9k, 7k, and 5k that I'd been testing. I'd flown out the low group to cover some incoming supply transports. The defense still did well though, getting about 1:1 and only losing 6 pilots on the day. Others got good experience. I'll move in a fresh Tojo group for the 7k CAP and drop the remaining A6M5b group to 5k for tomorrow. J2M2 are at 9k. Of note, all groups scrambled fighters even though set to 60-70% CAP. Only one radar here so warning was poor.

Some troops are moving down here to add on to Umboi Island, Cape Goucester, Long Island and back fill in some rear bases after I flew the major garrison force from Wewak to Finschafen. Looks like the Allies aren't moving forward there anymore though from Lae. They have also stopped the little supply drops around NW Oz and into the Solomons.

BURMA: Lots of movement along the Arakan. More troops moving up to do something. Maybe just get Akyab and Ramree built up. With the update to the recent patch I've made the choice to only try to close bases when necessary since the cost is much hgher losing 3-5 Helens per strike to CAP when I wasn't losing any before the update. No complaints though. This should help my jungle troops in Burma hold and my HI defenses later.

CENT PAC: Nothing moving out here. Still getting big hits on PH for SIGINT. Nothing helpful in the rollover yet.

I found my three remaining midget sub carriers and I'm sending one midget to Wake to see if I can't hit the AR in there. I'll then try to go pick up the very damaged midgets at Marcus to get them back to a shipyard, fixed and recycled. Noticed too that I've now lost around 8 Glen subs, which sucks. I need a few more for deep ocean recon. I might se some of he smaller Husimi class AV for this with Norms on board out in the IO since I need good tabs on surprises there, and if I lose them to CV air it would be worth it to know something is coming. As long as the ships don't get sighted and tracked on SIGINT the Norms might even find the enemy at 12-15 hexes before he knows where they are, and they could potentially still get out of dodge. A secondary benefit woud be to see if Joseph will be reckless with his supply lines to Oz from Cape town. If so, tankers make nice VP heavy targets that burn nicely even after only a few 50kg bomb hits.

ECON: My supply is going down for the first time in a while due to engine factory enlargements recently undertaken. I set a limit for myself for all fort building and base expansion of Jan 1, 1944. Everything will stop at that date. I don't care if I think I need it or not. All major strong points will have 5-7 forts by this time anyway, and most HI bases will have at least 3 forts and the airfields expanded to accommodate the late war confusion of groups all over the place. All potential major landing zones in the DEI, Burmese/Thai/Malay coasts, Kuriles/Hokkaido, and the PI that I plan to defend should be at forts 5-7 by then too.

At that point I want to save a whole bunch of supply. Palembang has been feeding the Burma troops, Medan feeding Sumatra building, with Miri/Balikpapan/Tarakan serving my Aussie plans and sending some out to Babeldaop, then to the Marianas. China is self-sufficient. The only supply coming from the HI is really to South/Cent Pac, usually in combo with units moving down.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 17, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Madang , at 97,123

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 37 NM, estimated altitude 33,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 53
J2M2 Jack x 27

Allied aircraft
P-38H Lightning x 66

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 7 destroyed
J2M2 Jack: 1 destroyed


Allied aircraft losses
P-38H Lightning: 6 destroyed

CAP engaged:
263 Ku S-1 with A6M5b Zero (0 airborne, 11 on standby, 11 scrambling)
5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000 , scrambling fighters between 9000 and 33000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 16 minutes
381 Ku S-1 with J2M2 Jack (0 airborne, 11 on standby, 11 scrambling)
5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000 , scrambling fighters between 9000 and 31000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 25 minutes
Hiryu-1 with A6M5b Zero (0 airborne, 11 on standby, 10 scrambling)
5 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 7000 , scrambling fighters between 7000 and 31000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 31 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Madang , at 97,123

Weather in hex: Overcast

Raid detected at 13 NM, estimated altitude 13,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M5b Zero x 34
J2M2 Jack x 18

Allied aircraft
Kittyhawk III x 12
P-38H Lightning x 36

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M5b Zero: 2 destroyed
J2M2 Jack: 2 destroyed


Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk III: 2 destroyed

CAP engaged:
263 Ku S-1 with A6M5b Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 14 scrambling)
3 plane(s) intercepting now.
1 plane(s) not yet engaged, 4 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000 , scrambling fighters between 5000 and 17000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 30 minutes
381 Ku S-1 with J2M2 Jack (0 airborne, 1 on standby, 9 scrambling)
4 plane(s) intercepting now.
8 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 9000 , scrambling fighters between 8000 and 14000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 30 minutes
Hiryu-1 with A6M5b Zero (0 airborne, 0 on standby, 12 scrambling)
4 plane(s) intercepting now.
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 7000 , scrambling fighters between 7000 and 11000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 26 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



He had several sweeping groups cooperate, and as shown here it took a while for the scramblers to arrive, but still Jacks and Zeros did well.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/15/2016 4:18:59 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 961
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/16/2016 11:50:58 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
18-19 November, 1943


OZ: So now that we've settled into the game a bit I felt it was time to try a few things. Step one came off poorly, but could still have the desired result.

I've been sending recon all over Australia and so far I haven't seen a lot of response in terms of the Allies adjusting CAP. I got a good read on Perth and there were no fighters up, so I rushed in the G3M3 that I'd been resting and gave them a shot. I added a few Emilys on for good measure and set it all to fly on the 19th.

Well, unfortunately the Emilys flew and the Nells did not, blowing my cover for the much bigger strike by the 2Es. Got two hits on subs and sunk an AMc. Ok. no big deal. I would guess now he'll cover Perth with CAP. If not I'll go back.

First though I have 100+ Nells set to strike Kalgoorlie's resources and another 100+ Bettys aiming for Cloncurry's resources for the 20th. The Cloncurry strikes have 45 A6M3a as escorts, but nothing for the Western strike. Here's hoping there is no CAP there!

After all of that I plan to bury Corunna Downs resources in 250kg bombs and para-drop Port Hedland, likely taking it back. Just some fun and easy pickins to hopefully set the Allies behind a bit further and gain some VPs the easy way.

SW PAC: Sending in all kinds of small supply TFs down here and there is no DL on them so far. They're covered by CAP, but it's possible he's not flying a lot of search, too.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 19, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Perth , at 49,147

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid detected at 92 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 34 minutes

Japanese aircraft
H8K2 Emily x 17

Japanese aircraft losses
H8K2 Emily: 2 damaged

Allied Ships
SS Salmon, Bomb hits 1, heavy damage
SS Triton, Bomb hits 1, heavy damage
AMc Djombang, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk


Allied ground losses:
4 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Aircraft Attacking:
5 x H8K2 Emily bombing from 10000 feet *
City Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
4 x H8K2 Emily bombing from 10000 feet *
Port Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb
8 x H8K2 Emily bombing from 10000 feet *
Port Attack: 4 x 250 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



If no CAP arrives, we may come back. I could also do some night bombing of industry and shipyards here, up to 50 planes per night.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 962
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/17/2016 2:16:07 AM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Low cap goodness!

Interesting thought on fort building...but feel free to violate it as the need arises.


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 963
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/17/2016 7:13:00 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Low cap goodness!

Interesting thought on fort building...but feel free to violate it as the need arises.




It is at least for the period from Jan 1 to July 1. After that I may resume some in the PI, along the Chinese coast, the inner islands and HI.

The other good thing I've been noticing about the low CAP is that my guys are staying fresh and full of good morale. Different than flying CAP at 31k, when they often dip into the 80s.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 964
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/17/2016 7:21:48 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
I just got the turn back from Joseph. He called me Commander Stormwolf for that Emily raid!

Now lets see if the other stuff actually worked or if I lost a bunch of 2Es.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 965
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/17/2016 10:57:37 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
20 November, 1943


OZ: Ok. It worked. Lots of Netties over various parts of OZ report 318 strategic points of damage to resource centers.

Now for part two. I'll be sending the bombers after whatever 900 man unit is at Port Hedland, followed by the 1st para-regiment. After that I'll consider options based on what recon shows, but will certainly take out the 100+ resources at Corunna Downs. I like this strat bombing thing in Oz. That is a lot of points from one day.

BURMA: Nothing going on. Another division finally got the 43 squads. About 2-3 left, but a big supply TF on the way that should help.

CENT PAC: Decided to boost Marcus back up to level 6 forts. Why not? If he does come again, those units are nice and experienced now!

SW PAC: My supply TFs are still unwatched. I'll keep fingers crossed it all can get landed.

In an interesting development, Salamua flips to the Japanese unexpectedly! He has a Brigade and base forces at Lae and a Division at Nadzab, but they won't be getting much supply soon since that just got cut when Salamua turned Japanese. Crazy. I few in a small SNLF battalion with 16 AV and a piece of an engineer unit to build a fort or two with the nice 2,800 supply points the Allies left sitting here. He needs naval forces in there now. I have lots of DBs in the area, and four old Kamikaze class DDs are on route to Rabaul to serve as surface protection.

Once the Oz situation has died down a bit I'll pop some Emilys at Kirakira for a good look around, then I need to send a good supply dump to Rekata Bay and Munda to be able to hold them for a bit longer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 20, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Cloncurry , at 84,142

Weather in hex: Partial cloud

Raid detected at 56 NM, estimated altitude 10,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 20 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M3 Nell x 15

No Japanese losses

Resources hits 13

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x G3M3 Nell bombing from 5000 feet
City Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afternoon Air attack on Kalgoorlie , at 56,147

Weather in hex: Clear sky

Raid spotted at 12 NM, estimated altitude 7,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 4 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M3 Nell x 20

No Japanese losses

Resources hits 36

Aircraft Attacking:
20 x G3M3 Nell bombing from 5000 feet
City Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I only had a 3 DL on Kalgoorlie, so it'll be interesting to see what happened there and if he can also cover Perth and Kalgoorlie with CAP.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 966
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/19/2016 1:55:25 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
21 November, 1943


OZ: The Australia plan continues. Netties bomb the unsuspecting base force at Port Hedland which is then overwhelmed by the IJ para troops of the 1st Raiding reg. Not much supply gained here but Allied troops surrender, which is always good, and this makes the obliteration of Corunna Downs the next step.

Recon shows 6 bombers, as previous, and two fighters at Perth. Odd. This makes me think a group was railed in and is repairing. I considered another strike here but I'll wait as I think there are bigger fish in the water.

I've decided that since Kalgoorlie is empty, I'll prepare an invasion of Geraldton and a para-drop on Kalgoorlie. This could go badly wrong if the Allied presence here is more than recon shows, but it's also a golden chance to hit some more resources, potentially wipe out some Allied troops, and to possibly acquire some fuel and supply resources that have been sent to West Oz. It's a gamble, but if the rail can be closed the Allies would have a long ride to get CVs in here from their presumed base at Pearl.

The drawback is I can't go until the mini-Kb transits to the DEI form it's previous station at Iwo Jima. It's now nearing Babeldaob. I have the amphibs and two divisions prepping for lightly held Geraldton, which shows two units and about 3k troops total. Probably an engineer and base force, or a small CD unit. There seem to be few if any AFVs in the whole area, and if Perth is showing 4 units for 12.5k troops with 80 guns and 9 AFVs, not much at all for opposition. My units would only get to 50-60% prep, but if the ground troops were light and got softened up, that could be enough. Then land a few more fresh units behind them.

If this takes more than a week to set up I'm worried the Allies will either see something on SIGINT or get the itch that things are not as they should be in West Oz, and send in reinforcements. I could preempt it all with a quick para-strike now, but that unit from Perth could then walk before I could get forces in the area, and lots of DBs and fighters could be flown in to Perth, not to mention some 4E or 2E to smash my troops and the fields so nothing else could be flown in.

It seems a D-Day would be two weeks out at the earliest, giving a chance to get in air cover, load two divisions plus follow on support and also troops to take Esperance and march on Kalgoorlie to reinforce. Let me know thoughts and if I'm being totally crazy here.

CENT PAC: Sending in lots of recon subs to watch for movements of the Allied fleets from Pearl. I've got two Glen subs on station, one to the NW and one due W from Pearl. A hunter/killer group of one Glen sub and three fast I-boats are heading to the area SW of the Big Island.

SW PAC: I'll continue making some noise down here to try to keep a focus in the area. Joseph bombed the troops at Kirakira yesterday with B-25D1s. I sent in a group of Rufes to discourage this activity. We'll see if they get eaten up by the forward guns of the strafers or if they can actually get behind for a few kills.

ECON: Two brand new shiny CVs arrived today. The last in the queue. (Not making Shinano or the last small Army CVEs). This means we had a major surplus of Naval points. I spent some time going through both Naval and Merchant lines and getting a better sense of what I still want.

I cancelled some later arriving fast tankers to prioritize medium and small short hoppers that arrive earlier. I'm finding with coastal routing it makes sense to send medium sized tankers on shorter hauls to places like Takao and Manilla from the DEI. Then I need more medium tankers to haul along the islands and coast to the main western ports of the HI.

For the Naval construction I was able to add a number of subs to the queue. I'll build a lot of them, as I know I'll lose a lot, and still think it's worth it in VPs if one or two large ships can be sunk. They are also incredibly useful for early warning. Looking forward to the Es coming soon. After a few RO boats come in early 44 I may accelerate some late arriving DDs, as I know from experience I'll be very short come the start of 45.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 21, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Port Hedland RAN Base Force, at 57,129 (Port Hedland)

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 30 NM, estimated altitude 12,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M3 Nell x 60
G4M1 Betty x 14

No Japanese losses

Allied ground losses:
142 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Aircraft Attacking:
36 x G3M3 Nell bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
24 x G3M3 Nell bombing from 10000 feet
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb
9 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 10000 feet *
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
5 x G4M1 Betty bombing from 10000 feet *
Ground Attack: 2 x 250 kg GP Bomb
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Port Hedland (57,129)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 555 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 23

Defending force 189 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 18

Allied adjusted defense: 1

Japanese assault odds: 18 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Port Hedland !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+), disruption(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
133 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 16 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 1 (1 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 1


Assaulting units:
1st Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
Port Hedland RAN Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Carrying the kids around the neighborhood.






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/19/2016 5:51:07 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 967
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/19/2016 2:23:07 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
Love the picture!

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 968
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/19/2016 5:49:01 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

Love the picture!


It's the only one I've even found of an actual IJN sub carrier in action on the water. Lots of dry-docked midgets ready to tackle the Allied invasion of the HI pics, lots of washed up midget picks, but no others I can find like this. It was really small so had to doctor it up a bit.


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 969
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/20/2016 6:17:05 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
Ok. So I learned something. Even on the sub carrier an injured midget will sink if it's got high system damage. I hadn't seen that before.

How in the world does it sink? It's strapped to the deck of a boat moving on the surface??





< Message edited by obvert -- 5/20/2016 6:19:16 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 970
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/20/2016 7:45:29 PM   
Drakanel

 

Posts: 253
Joined: 4/6/2015
Status: offline
Easy. The ship's crew throw it in the sea while the captain is not looking. "Sorry captain, it sunk! Guess we won't have to toil for weeks to fix it. What a pity..."

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 971
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/20/2016 8:04:22 PM   
Canoerebel


Posts: 21100
Joined: 12/14/2002
From: Northwestern Georgia, USA
Status: offline
Was this the captain in command of your midget sub?




Attachment (1)

(in reply to Drakanel)
Post #: 972
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/20/2016 10:13:05 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Drakanel

Easy. The ship's crew throw it in the sea while the captain is not looking. "Sorry captain, it sunk! Guess we won't have to toil for weeks to fix it. What a pity..."


Yeah, Except everyone forgot the captured Allied bootleg whiskey ration from Marcus was stored in there!


quote:

ORIGINAL: Canoerebel

Was this the captain in command of your midget sub?



I don't think he was there, but the broad might have been. The midget did happen to sink during the time a very ... um, small waisted, dress was found in the I-22 laundry area.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Drakanel)
Post #: 973
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/23/2016 2:26:39 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
22-24 November, 1943


BURMA: A few boring turns and then the Allies showed they're coming out to play at last. On the 24th the change was first indicated by a P-47 sweep over Chang Mai. I'd been using this as a bomber base for ages, only protected by Oscar and A6M3a escort CAP. It was out of fighter range but I haven't been bombing Lashio and Akyab lately, so now it is definitely in range.

Joseph's first big strike as Allied commander comes off nearly perfectly. He targets the weak point and sends massive force to overwhelm the base defenses. To top it off there was no AA here, so 26 planes destroyed on the ground and another 38 in the air defending sweeps. Fortunately, only 12 pilots are KIA or MIA. All planes here will fly/rail out and we'll reset.

I'm hoping this means he'll soon begin to test other defenses. We'll see. The first Frank group is ready to go in Rangoon, and Georges and Jacks are mixed in with Tojo IIc at the other major airfields. The Allies have a few hundred P-47s and Corsairs, should have just gotten the Spit VIII and have at least 250-300 4E in the area.

WEST OZ: Looks like something from Perth has moved to Kalgoorlie. No chance to Paradrop there now. Still preparing some more action in the area though. I'd like to get Exmouth and Carnarvon back just to stall things in this area and make search and recon harder for the Allies into the DEI.

CHINA: In China there is a good group of forces at Sining, so I'll wait for reinforcements before attacking here, not knowing forts. These units should just be VPs at this point.

SW PAC: A P-38 sweep ruined our Rufe ambush at Kirakira. I left them there too long, so my bad, and good play on Joseph's part. Lost about 10 planes, but again not many pilots over our base.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 24, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Morning Air attack on Chiang Mai , at 58,53

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 10 NM, estimated altitude 33,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 2 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 36
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 27

Allied aircraft
P-47D2 Thunderbolt x 20

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M3a Zero: 5 destroyed
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 5 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-47D2 Thunderbolt: 1 destroyed

CAP engaged:
252 Ku S-1 with A6M3a Zero (0 airborne, 10 on standby, 22 scrambling)
4 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 6000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 28 minutes
203rd Sentai with Ki-43-IIIa Oscar (0 airborne, 8 on standby, 16 scrambling)
3 plane(s) not yet engaged, 0 being recalled, 0 out of immediate contact.
Group patrol altitude is 6000
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 27 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Chiang Mai , at 58,53

Weather in hex: Heavy rain

Raid spotted at 34 NM, estimated altitude 14,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 11 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M3a Zero x 27
Ki-43-IIIa Oscar x 14

Allied aircraft
B-17E Fortress x 32
B-24D1 Liberator x 33
B-24J Liberator x 6

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M3a Zero: 1 destroyed
A6M3a Zero: 1 destroyed on ground

Ki-43-IIIa Oscar: 1 damaged
Ki-49-IIa Helen: 7 destroyed on ground
Ki-49-IIb Helen: 5 destroyed on ground


Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 3 damaged
B-24D1 Liberator: 3 damaged
B-24J Liberator: 1 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
5 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Airbase hits 17
Airbase supply hits 3
Runway hits 64

Aircraft Attacking:
15 x B-24D1 Liberator bombing from 12000 feet
Airfield Attack: 10 x 500 lb GP Bomb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Having some problems with CV air groups arriving on their ships. The Ryuho has been in Yokohama for a few weeks but the air groups have not arrived on ship even though it's empty and in port. I took it out and docked it thinking that might be the key, but no go. Any thoughts?






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/23/2016 2:29:16 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 974
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/23/2016 3:05:18 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
I have not seen that before with the Ryuho...sounds like a good tech support question.

I am amazed at even how just one AA battery can reduce the damage to planes on the ground and ships in port.

AA, don't leave the home islands without it.



< Message edited by Lowpe -- 5/23/2016 3:08:30 PM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 975
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/24/2016 9:27:37 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
I have a lot of AA sitting in the HI and some of the unrestricted units will be moving forward. In a game where the KB is reduced I'm loathe to move a lot of it out, just to make sure any decisive move into range of he HI still has a decent counter from AA and air groups in the HI. It's a little bit like Japan in the war, keeping the Georges and other best planes, plus some very large and experienced divisions in the HI, Korea, China and elsewhere around the inner circle.

Although I'm threatening forward, I actually want to stall for time to be able to create a modified Capt Cruft inner circle defense. A few hard outer layers and a jaw breaking nut in the area round the HI.



_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 976
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/24/2016 11:49:14 AM   
ny59giants


Posts: 9869
Joined: 1/10/2005
Status: offline
Air groups for Japanese CVs - Don't forget that for some scenarios the air groups come in as if the CV was never accelerated. I know it shouldn't happen, but sometimes the mod was not set up well enough and this happens.

Pilot vs airframe losses - For Japan, they can afford airframes being destroyed, but not dead pilots. For Allies, I'm usually in great shape when it come to US Army fighter pilots, but cannot afford the airframe losses. Go figure!?!

_____________________________


(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 977
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/26/2016 7:19:25 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Air groups for Japanese CVs - Don't forget that for some scenarios the air groups come in as if the CV was never accelerated. I know it shouldn't happen, but sometimes the mod was not set up well enough and this happens.

Pilot vs airframe losses - For Japan, they can afford airframes being destroyed, but not dead pilots. For Allies, I'm usually in great shape when it come to US Army fighter pilots, but cannot afford the airframe losses. Go figure!?!


So, the Ryuho has been in game for a while, and it wasn't accelerated. The air group just arrives later. The air group has been sitting in the arrival queue for 1-2 weeks at 2 days. The Ryuho is empty, is sitting in Yokohama, and the air group won't arrive.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to ny59giants)
Post #: 978
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/26/2016 7:22:52 AM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Air groups for Japanese CVs - Don't forget that for some scenarios the air groups come in as if the CV was never accelerated. I know it shouldn't happen, but sometimes the mod was not set up well enough and this happens.

Pilot vs airframe losses - For Japan, they can afford airframes being destroyed, but not dead pilots. For Allies, I'm usually in great shape when it come to US Army fighter pilots, but cannot afford the airframe losses. Go figure!?!


So, the Ryuho has been in game for a while, and it wasn't accelerated. The air group just arrives later. The air group has been sitting in the arrival queue for 1-2 weeks at 2 days. The Ryuho is empty, is sitting in Yokohama, and the air group won't arrive.


That's very odd. What happens if you move her to Tokyo? Probably nothing, I know.

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 979
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/26/2016 9:39:30 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna


quote:

ORIGINAL: obvert


quote:

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

Air groups for Japanese CVs - Don't forget that for some scenarios the air groups come in as if the CV was never accelerated. I know it shouldn't happen, but sometimes the mod was not set up well enough and this happens.

Pilot vs airframe losses - For Japan, they can afford airframes being destroyed, but not dead pilots. For Allies, I'm usually in great shape when it come to US Army fighter pilots, but cannot afford the airframe losses. Go figure!?!


So, the Ryuho has been in game for a while, and it wasn't accelerated. The air group just arrives later. The air group has been sitting in the arrival queue for 1-2 weeks at 2 days. The Ryuho is empty, is sitting in Yokohama, and the air group won't arrive.


That's very odd. What happens if you move her to Tokyo? Probably nothing, I know.


I'll give it a try since she's right there.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lokasenna)
Post #: 980
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/26/2016 9:54:38 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
25-26 November, 1943


WEST OZ: Got a flight of Nells shot up by some Beaufighters. Lost about 13 on the day. So Kalgoorlie is now well protected. Preparing for a para-drop on Exmouth. Should be able to isolate and take that base back. The Allies have built a nice level 5 field there.

SUBS: Juicy convoy of LSI(L), AKA and APA near the New Hebrides that I-169 couldn't hit with a spread of four fish. They're moving NE, so that could mean action in the Solomons or Cent Pac soon.

SW PAC: Bases getting good supply drops all around New Guinea and New Britain. Nothing contested yet. The units at Lae must be getting a bit low since our rowboat corps took over their supply line.

ECON: Supply is now slowly going up again while oil/fuel is hanging fairly steady. There has been another rise in bunker fuel use as I shift new troops around and prepare for ops in West OZ, but the KB and all but a few surface ships are upgrading or sitting in port doing nothing.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 25, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ASW attack near Ouv'ea at 117,156

Japanese Ships
SS I-169

Allied Ships
DMS Southard
APA Leonard Wood
LSI(L) Westralia
LSI(L) Kanimbla
LSI(L) Manoora
LSI(L) Glenartney
LSI(L) Glenapp
AKA Aquarius
AKA Virgo
AKA Thuban
DMS Hopkins

SS I-169 launches 4 torpedoes at DMS Southard
I-169 diving deep ....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 26, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Morning Air attack on Kalgoorlie , at 56,147

Weather in hex: Severe storms

Raid detected at 57 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 21 minutes

Japanese aircraft
G3M3 Nell x 23

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter VIc x 15

Japanese aircraft losses
G3M3 Nell: 8 destroyed, 2 damaged

No Allied losses

Resources hits 3

Aircraft Attacking:
8 x G3M3 Nell bombing from 5000 feet
City Attack: 2 x 250 kg SAP Bomb, 4 x 60 kg GP Bomb

CAP engaged:
No.31 Sqn RAAF with Beaufighter VIc (2 airborne, 4 on standby, 9 scrambling)
2 plane(s) intercepting now.
Group patrol altitude is 8000 , scrambling fighters between 5000 and 8000.
Time for all group planes to reach interception is 22 minutes

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Kagoorlie looks defended, but this likely means Perth is not and there isn't much in Geraldton. Part of messing with the Allies over here is to force some allocation of forces to teh area, further spreading what is available. Plus, there could be good pools of supply and fuel over here. We'll see.





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 5/26/2016 9:56:48 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 981
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 5/29/2016 2:31:55 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
27-28 November, 1943


WEST OZ: Paras of the 1st Raiding Reg land at Exmouth and attack, knocking forts down from 3 to 2 in a 1:1 result. On the 28th they drop forts to 0 getting a 2:1 and will continue to attack in spite of fatigue. Shortly after this two other SNLF para units will strike at Carnarvon.

If both bases fall quickly, in about a week, if all stil looks good, I may land two divisions at Geraldton. I have tanks prepping for Esperance, so if there is a strong response railed in there is a possibility to strike there and threaten cutting off forward troops at Kalgoorlie.

I don't expect all of this to go forward, and I'm sure he's been getting SIGINT hits for all of these units prepping and moving, but it may at least force the Allies to put units out of position, change prep possibly, and maybe even draw CVs into an area where they can be observed and even put under threat by hunter/killer sub groups.

BURMA: Still a lot of nothing here. A lot moving down the Arakan.

SIGINT: A week or so ago there were some big blips on SIGINT moving Southwest of PH. I am now seeing increased activity at Sydney. This seems like it could be a shift of the CVs to So Pac and possibly to West OZ. I have some I-boat scouts aong the South OZ coast, but will transfer a few more down here now to hopefully spot any move coming this way.

Also, in a related note, I am seeing some units along the rail moving to West OZ. So far it looks like no divisions have popped up in Perth or Geraldton, but recon is on high alert for anything new arriving.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 27, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Exmouth (50,129)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 521 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 25

Defending force 1543 troops, 14 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 7

Japanese adjusted assault: 17

Allied adjusted defense: 10

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
28 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled

Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
16 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled


Assaulting units:
1st Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
16th RAAF Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 28, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Exmouth (50,129)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 866 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 28

Defending force 1513 troops, 14 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 6

Japanese adjusted assault: 34

Allied adjusted defense: 15

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), leaders(+)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+)

Japanese ground losses:
8 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
29 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled


Assaulting units:
1st Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
16th RAAF Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This is a pretty good shot at Pearl. The first time CV/CVL have shown up, although that doesn't mean they really are there.






Attachment (1)

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 982
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 3:16:04 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
29-30 November, 1943


WEST OZ: Apologies for the lack of updates. We're still doing a turn a day and often 2 a day on the weekends. It's busy at work around now, and I've been enjoying the turns and taking my time there instead of here working on posting. That'll change soon. Only a week until summer break!

The plodding toward the West OZ coastline continues. I've loaded two divisions aimed at Geraldton with 40+ prep each and a few other supporting units to follow assuming they take the base in short order. I've never landed against defended targets with prep this low, so I'm curious how this will work. If it's a disaster I'll just load up and clear out.

It seems Joseph is holing up in Kalgoorlie and not interested in committing to a defense here, which reduces one of the goals; getting VPs for Allied units. It helps in the other goal of quickly acquiring the region to see i we can inherit some resources and use some industry to support a delay in any Allied advance to the DEI through West Oz.

Paras took Exmouth on the 29th and this level 5 field will be useful to search and ward off \allied threats into the future. Next stop; Carnarvon.

SW PAC: I sent 4 Kamikaze class old DDs in to Iron Bottom sound to rattle the PT boat flotilla there, and managed to sink 5 of the pesky things. It was very dark and that seemed to work this time. Not sure what is better for killing PTs, but in daylight the DDs didn't hit a thing in the third engagement of the turn. These and two fast Es and a few RO boats are the only IJN presence in the area. I'm going to rely on air power to slow things here, but no major IJN commitments.

The Allies invaded Kirakira with a NZ Brigade, but it looks like prep was low, as there were a lot of disablements over the beach.

CHINA: In the North and West of China the IJA took Yenan easily and reduced forts at Kiuchuan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 29, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Yenan (88,37)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 13812 troops, 76 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 422

Defending force 3848 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 94

Japanese adjusted assault: 438

Allied adjusted defense: 27

Japanese assault odds: 16 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Yenan !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
186 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 22 disabled

Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Allied ground losses:
999 casualties reported
Squads: 28 destroyed, 13 disabled
Non Combat: 51 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Units retreated 2


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
17th Ind.Mixed Brigade
9th Ind.Mixed Brigade

Defending units:
19th Chinese Corps
13th Group Army


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kiuchuan (82,26)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 4024 troops, 20 guns, 239 vehicles, Assault Value = 134

Defending force 8490 troops, 36 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 228

Japanese adjusted assault: 156

Allied adjusted defense: 152

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 3)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: forts(+), preparation(-), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
189 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 27 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
265 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 36 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled


Assaulting units:
5th Armored Car Co
15th Tank Regiment
4th Cavalry Brigade
23rd Tank Regiment

Defending units:
11th Chinese Corps
34th Separate Brigade
17th Group Army

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Exmouth (50,129)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 859 troops, 1 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 27

Defending force 1345 troops, 14 guns, 3 vehicles, Assault Value = 4

Japanese adjusted assault: 17

Allied adjusted defense: 3

Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Exmouth !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(-), disruption(-)
Attacker: shock(+), leaders(+), leaders(-)

Allied ground losses:
467 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 25 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 11 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 10 (10 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 1


Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
1st Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
16th RAAF Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR November 30, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amphibious Assault at Kirakira (116,140)

TF 14 troops unloading over beach at Kirakira, 116,140

Allied ground losses:
148 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 68 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 122 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 18 (0 destroyed, 18 disabled)
Vehicles lost 20 (0 destroyed, 20 disabled)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kirakira (116,140)

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 478 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 17

Defending force 7714 troops, 58 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 117

Assaulting units:
II/84th Naval Guard Unit
1st JNAF Coy

Defending units:
2nd NZ Brigade
22nd USN Naval Construction Regiment
176th USAAF Base Force
6th RAAF Base Force


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Carnarvon (49,133)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 677 troops, 6 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Defending force 3164 troops, 8 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 17

Japanese adjusted assault: 24

Allied adjusted defense: 7

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-), preparation(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
74 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled

Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
108 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 1st SNLF /1
4th Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
110th USA Base Force
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Success!! Moved the CVL to Tokyo and got the air groups the next turn. Thanks Loka!






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 6/2/2016 3:19:16 PM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 983
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 3:48:25 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
What was the pilot skill on the Glen to get you 4/4 DL on Pearl? Or was there more than one?

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 984
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 4:13:17 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

What was the pilot skill on the Glen to get you 4/4 DL on Pearl? Or was there more than one?


I've been getting 2-3 SIGINT messages a day sporadically over the last several weeks. No recon!

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 985
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 7:12:06 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
This is the kind of thing I've been getting a lot of recently. Usually that will reveal a number of individual ships in port and the fighter/bomber numbers.


SIG INT REPORT FOR Dec 01, 43

Radio transmissions detected at 54,147.
Radio transmissions detected at Boise (218,55).
Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Pearl Harbor (180,107).
Radio transmissions detected at Vladivostok (112,46).
Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Pearl Harbor (180,107).
Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Pearl Harbor (180,107).


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 986
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 7:29:30 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline
1-3 December, 1943


WEST OZ: Carnarvon falls. The US base force loses a bunch of support troops and if all goes well has no place to go anyway. Now the focus is on Geraldton. The portion of the IJN assigned to cover landings is moving past Exmouth into a dead zone without subs or air patrols now. I've tested the area and he's not really flying search here now, and subs are seemingly staying close to the shore. I've got a large contingent of subs patrolling off of Esperance and Albany to see what is coming and I want to send two 4 plane AV ships into the deeper IO to guard that flank, and they're moving slowly from Koepang now.

Gotta be careful, something big seems to be at Sydney.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SIG INT REPORT FOR Dec 02, 43

Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Sydney (90,167).
Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Bombay (36,24).
Heavy Volume of Radio transmissions detected at Sydney (90,167).
Radio transmissions detected at Corvallis (213,58).
Radio transmissions detected at Pago Pago (148,161).
Radio transmissions detected at Fort Ord (220,72).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SW PAC: The Allied attack immediately at Kirakira, getting a 1:1 at first, and I decide it's time to give up my forward scouting base and fly out most of the two small Coy units here. I'm not really defending much below the Rabaul-Fincshafen line, so it's smoke and mirrors through the entire Solomons chain. I'll rattle some bones and bang some coconut trees occasionally, but mainly I'm just waiting for the Allies to be in range of the air force. By the time they are there will be Franks and service 2 Georges and Jacks down here, which is good.

VPs: I'm eating 2-4 VPs a turn in central Burma by not garrisoning those bases. I don't want to lose troops, and by keeping no garrisons, damage on the fields has moved to 100/100 for three of the four so far. It's a small drain on my VP ratio, but it's also a delay for the Allies to get moving over here. I'l take it.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR December 1, 42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kirakira (116,140)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6296 troops, 58 guns, 62 vehicles, Assault Value = 119

Defending force 700 troops, 3 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 17

Allied adjusted assault: 51

Japanese adjusted defense: 31

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
58 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
14 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
2nd NZ Brigade
176th USAAF Base Force
22nd USN Naval Construction Regiment
6th RAAF Base Force

Defending units:
II/84th Naval Guard Unit
1st JNAF Coy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Carnarvon (49,133)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 1097 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 41

Defending force 3084 troops, 8 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 13

Japanese adjusted assault: 14

Allied adjusted defense: 6

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Carnarvon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: leaders(+), disruption(-), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-), supply(-)

Japanese ground losses:
87 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 0 disabled

Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
866 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 62 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 6 (5 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Units retreated 1

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 1st SNLF /1
4th Raiding Rgt /1

Defending units:
110th USA Base Force

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Looks like the fortress, a brigade and a base force maybe?






Attachment (1)

< Message edited by obvert -- 6/3/2016 9:39:50 AM >


_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 987
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 8:47:08 PM   
Lowpe


Posts: 22133
Joined: 2/25/2013
Status: offline
You don't need me to tell you to be careful down there in Oz...my goodness it is almost 1944 after all!

But I will.

< Message edited by Lowpe -- 6/2/2016 8:49:16 PM >

(in reply to obvert)
Post #: 988
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 9:17:47 PM   
Lokasenna


Posts: 9297
Joined: 3/3/2012
From: Iowan in MD/DC
Status: offline
Interesting how late you're moving on SW Australia.

I did it "late" also, I want to say September of 1943, and I had a really rough time getting out.

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 989
RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) - 6/2/2016 10:44:12 PM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lowpe

You don't need me to tell you to be careful down there in Oz...my goodness it is almost 1944 after all!

But I will.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

Interesting how late you're moving on SW Australia.

I did it "late" also, I want to say September of 1943, and I had a really rough time getting out.


I hear ya'll. The idea here is not to take and hold. I noticed a while back there was little here. Even before Joseph took over the game I'd made some adjustments to have the possibility of hitting the West Coast from Exmouth down. I knew there were only superficial forces here, and that if he had prepped and bought out Aussie troops for Burma and So Pac, then there might not be a lot still able to react. If there were then they would possibly be delayed in other areas, or change prep even if I do manage to force a larger engagement here.

If I can get some territory here, then I will get anything important out ASAP. I'll aim to pull any fuel or large amounts of supply left over, and leave only small forces and air power, plus a good number of short range subs.

Carnarvon and Exmouth will serve as scout bases with naval guards holding against paras, so they'll have to be prepped fr or bypassed, but could still serve as information posts regardless.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Lowpe)
Post #: 990
Page:   <<   < prev  31 32 [33] 34 35   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: The Elephant Vanishes :: obvert (J) vs SqzMyLemon (A) Page: <<   < prev  31 32 [33] 34 35   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

2.687