Zorch
Posts: 7087
Joined: 3/7/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy quote:
ORIGINAL: warspite1 quote:
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy What's all this then? Something going on with your regional soccer tourney? No, its the third of four quarter finals of the football World Cup - the world's favourite game played by almost every country on the planet. Next? Ah. I heard that it was all about certain usual suspect European teams against other European teams. You know, a regional soccer tourney. Hardly representative of the world, mate. warspite1 Not sure on your sources but you may wish to have a word a) Many of the usual European teams are gone - Italy and Holland never made it and Germany are out b) Please tell your source that Japan, Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Egypt, Mexico etc. etc. etc. are not in Europe. Almost every country in the world attempted to qualify for the tournament and every continent (except Antarctica) was represented (albeit Australia got there via Asia ). The second round of games saw representatives from Asia, Central and South America involved (unusually there was no African presence this time) although - very unusually - all South American presence was extinguished at the quarter final stage. Representative of the world? Oh yes indeed. I bet that if you ask representatives of every continent (save Europe) if the World Cup finals are representative of the world, a majority would say 'no'. warspite1 Every continent? How many World Cups have there been? A European country has won 11 - a South American country has won 9. I haven't done the maths on the % of tournament participants to continental nos. but for a continent with what? 12 countries? South America has a much greater % of participants than Europe. As the tournament expands so FIFA try and make the game increasingly more global with African, Asian, Central American and even Oceania involvement growing. The development of football in Asia will take time but African football is firmly established and players from the continent are employed by top clubs in europe and elsewhere now. I think given their status they would all agree that they have sufficient opportunity vis-a-vis numbers allowed per tournament. Oh, Warspite1 Warspite1 Warspite1... My comment "I bet that if you ask representatives of every continent (save Europe) if the World Cup finals are representative of the world, a majority would say 'no'." was intended in jest / juxtaposition. It's not a commentary about historical cups division or per capita distribution of previous world cups. It was referring to this and only this World Cup finals. Clearly, a World Cup finals with only European nations participating in it cannot be representative of the world. From the geographical standpoint. Plus, when you ask an irked Brazilian about whether the finals are representative of the world, he will likely say 'no'. Of course not. Because of the home town fanboism. I suspect that there are similar fanbois worldwide that will also see this myopic logic. Now would you please allow me to troll you in peace and quiet? I'm shocked, shocked, to hear of trolling on this august forum.
Attachment (1)
|