Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Ulithi

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Ulithi Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Ulithi - 8/12/2014 10:33:14 PM   
szmike

 

Posts: 345
Joined: 8/30/2009
Status: offline

Thread of the year.

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 31
RE: Ulithi - 8/13/2014 4:59:41 AM   
warspite1


Posts: 41353
Joined: 2/2/2008
From: England
Status: offline
Some great pictures there. Love those of the South Dakota

The CV's all lined up I've seen before - still makes for one hell of an impressive site. An awesome display of sea power.....

_____________________________

England expects that every man will do his duty. Horatio Nelson October 1805



(in reply to Capt Cliff)
Post #: 32
RE: Ulithi - 8/13/2014 9:05:39 AM   
obvert


Posts: 14050
Joined: 1/17/2011
From: PDX (and now) London, UK
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff


quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58


quote:

ORIGINAL: Capt Cliff

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58

Port size in the game drives unload speeds and repair capability. While Ulithi was a vast, relatively safe anchorage, how much shore infrastructure was ever built? If you make it a 6 you're making it roughly a Brisbane, and that's nuts.


I disagree. To have that many ship in a "lagoon harbor" and being able to refuel, resupply and rearm them does give you the same capacity of a size 6 port. It is stupid to think you would just harbor ships there without having the ability to resupply them. Actually it is laughable.


In your haste to post a snarky response you have once again failed to grasp the points in question. So, one more time:

1. Port size in the game drives cargo load/unload rates. Supplies and fuel for storage at ashore facilities such as tank farms and warehouse complexes. Speed is a function of pier services and civilian longshoreman assets. Hence, Brisbane= fast, and a Port Level 0 atoll=slow. If you make the atoll the same level as Brisbane it becomes Brisbane on this measure. But it has no real estate to build those facilities.

2. Ship repair, which you ignore in the reply above, is also a function of port size, the other sources of repair points (naval, support, own-ship, tenders, yards) being equal. Port-based repair point generation is an abstraction of, again, ashore brick & mortar shops combined with a skilled civilian workforce. Brisbane has them, Ulithi does not. Although that guy in the breechclout in the OP's photos could be a skilled pipefitter I suppose. And that other guy in the breechclout might have superior underwater welding skills. Regardless, make Ulithi a Port Level 6, and they'll have to learn.



Sophistry! I suppose all the CB's on Ulithi does not equate to your ... "brick & mortar shops combined with a skilled civilian workforce". Ahem (ships were made from brick and motar, I thought they were steel)... Sir you have no idea what your talking about. The US Navy would not base the 3rd/5th Fleet at Ulithi if it could not maintain and supply them there. They did, so Ulithi and Brisbane must be and are effectively equal. One has docks while the other had 100's of small ships doing a similar task as dock. A means to transfer supplies.


Huh. So you're agreeing then that Ulithi should in fact be a lower port rating than Brisbane because most of the work is done by 100s of small ships. Those ships are in game, so instead of a higher port rating, you have to move the ships there. I don't mean the LSVP and other boats, I mean the support ships that did the work of repairing, supplying and maintaining the fleet.

_____________________________

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm." - Winston Churchill

(in reply to Capt Cliff)
Post #: 33
RE: Ulithi - 8/13/2014 2:08:27 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LoBaron

I am in awe about this exemplary demonstration of inability to comprehend written language. Respect.

+1

doesn't want to ....

_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to LoBaron)
Post #: 34
RE: Ulithi - 8/13/2014 3:13:21 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline
This is a Port.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 35
RE: Ulithi - 8/13/2014 3:13:59 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline
This is the “Port” of Ulithi; Sorlen Island 1945. Note the vast scale, the extensive cargo handling, distribution, and storage facilities; the drydocks and repair piers; the fabrication shops; the fuel farms and power stations.

Giving it a 3:3 is unbelievably generous. It should be a 0:1. The “actual” base at Ulithi was the USN Service Squadron (1st Advanced Fleet Base), which was “ALL” afloat and could move to and set up anywhere. It picked Ulithi because of the sheer scale of the 100 foot, good holding bottom, protected anchorage footprint.

Obviously The Moose, Obvert, and others, know exactly what they are talking about.



Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Symon -- 8/13/2014 4:23:58 PM >


_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 36
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 3:04:09 PM   
PaxMondo


Posts: 9750
Joined: 6/6/2008
Status: offline
nice shots ... THANKS!

< Message edited by PaxMondo -- 8/14/2014 4:04:35 PM >


_____________________________

Pax

(in reply to Symon)
Post #: 37
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 4:12:53 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline
Symon has done , as usual, an outstanding job of making sense out of the mystifying. So I guess the only question in my mind is not if the port is equivalent to Brisbane or whatever, but can you indeed put the right mixture and number of service ships to bring it up to the capability that it had in reality (due to service squadron 10 + others)? I'm guessing yes.

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there?


_____________________________


(in reply to PaxMondo)
Post #: 38
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 5:08:05 PM   
Symon


Posts: 1928
Joined: 11/24/2012
From: De Eye-lands, Mon
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
Symon has done , as usual, an outstanding job of making sense out of the mystifying. So I guess the only question in my mind is not if the port is equivalent to Brisbane or whatever, but can you indeed put the right mixture and number of service ships to bring it up to the capability that it had in reality (due to service squadron 10 + others)? I'm guessing yes.

Just for grins, here’s Sorlen Island and North Anchorage without the 3rd or 5th Fleet in town. The ships are from R.Adm. P Hendren’s Service Squadron, So Pac Force. I see floating drydocks, AOs, AEs, ARs, hospital ships, supply and refrigerator ships, and a virtual cornucopia of LSTs (some specially configured as ARs, etc..) LCMs, Lighter As, Lighter Ds, etc.. The really big stuff was off the left edge of the photo, in the Pegeef/Asor corner. The fleet anchorages were off the right edge of the picture in the anchorages from MogMog to Eleute.

Don Bowen and I spent months making sure every single relevant ship was in the database and that the code would work with them, for exactly this contingency. Works a bit better in Babes, but it's there for Stock as well.
quote:

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there?

I don't know, but from the nature of your question, I think you do. I would really like to know that. I'm sure Don would like to know that too.




Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Nous n'avons pas peur! Vive la liberté! Moi aussi je suis Charlie!
Yippy Ki Yay.

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 39
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 6:44:50 PM   
urtel


Posts: 125
Joined: 9/6/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there?



USS Mississinewa AO-59, sunk by jap mini sub...

(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 40
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 7:29:30 PM   
AW1Steve


Posts: 14507
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: Mordor Illlinois
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: urtel


quote:

ORIGINAL: AW1Steve

BTW , bit of trivia. Can anyone tell me the one ship from service squadron 10 that is still there?



USS Mississinewa AO-59, sunk by jap mini sub...


Absolutely correct!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Mississinewa_(AO-59)

_____________________________


(in reply to urtel)
Post #: 41
RE: Ulithi - 8/14/2014 10:21:24 PM   
Mundy


Posts: 2869
Joined: 6/26/2002
From: Neenah
Status: offline
The ppt file linked to on Wiki is very interesting on how they got the oil out of the wreck. < 5 gallons released.

Ed-

_____________________________


(in reply to AW1Steve)
Post #: 42
RE: Ulithi - 8/15/2014 10:58:24 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
I think these guys are charging outrageous prices for their films, but the previews are free. This is a flyover of Ulithi while the 3rd fleet was at anchor:

http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675037790_United-States-5th-fleet_anchored-ships_mother-ship_hospital-ship

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to Mundy)
Post #: 43
RE: Ulithi - 8/17/2014 6:47:11 PM   
rjopel

 

Posts: 614
Joined: 12/19/2007
From: Charlottesville, VA, USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: wdolson

I think these guys are charging outrageous prices for their films, but the previews are free. This is a flyover of Ulithi while the 3rd fleet was at anchor:

http://www.criticalpast.com/video/65675037790_United-States-5th-fleet_anchored-ships_mother-ship_hospital-ship



Especially since the films they are showing are in the Public Domain as US Government films.

(in reply to wdolson)
Post #: 44
RE: Ulithi - 8/17/2014 11:17:53 PM   
wdolson

 

Posts: 10398
Joined: 6/28/2006
From: Near Portland, OR
Status: offline
I found some footage my father's unit shot on Attu on their site. My father was able to identify some footage he shot and spotted some names he remembered. I'm not paying their prices for the footage though.

Bill

_____________________________

WitP AE - Test team lead, programmer

(in reply to rjopel)
Post #: 45
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> RE: Ulithi Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.516