Matrix Games Forums

Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 12:46:36 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F9F-2 should not able to do supercruise.

Its max speed should smaller than 500kt.

http://www.joebaugher.com/navy_fighters/f9_2.html

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 181
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 12:55:45 PM   
JCR

 

Posts: 160
Joined: 11/4/2013
Status: offline
I don't think TGC Yavuz/SMS Goeben ever had radar, perhaps a search set but not the elaborate fire control suite it has here.

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 182
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 12:59:35 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F-84B/C/E/G should not have same maximum speed as F-84F. (Straight-wing vs Swept-wing)
And they should not have afterburner. (Since F-94 is the first one with afterburner.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84_Thunderjet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84F_Thunderstreak





< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 11/29/2013 2:07:23 PM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 183
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:06:25 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F-80 should not able to do supercruise. (590kt = 1.03M)

F-80A/B should < 485kt
F-80C should < 515kt

http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p80_4.html
http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/p80_6.html

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 184
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:15:57 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F-89D/H/J should be not able to fly over 1 Mach. (F-100 should be the first one?)

Max speed should be smaller than 552kt.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-89_Scorpion

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 185
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:21:12 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F4D has too fast max speed (900kt.)
Its max speed should smaller than 627kt.

400kt loiter speed is also strange. (Same as SR-71 in CMANO.)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_F4D_Skyray
http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/F4D-1_SAC_-_1_February_1954.pdf

< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 11/30/2013 6:25:36 AM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 186
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:27:31 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F7U should have afterburner.
And it maximum speed and loiter speed also need some modification.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F7U#Specifications_.28F7U-3M.29

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 187
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:30:35 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F-94's maximum speed should not over 1 Mach.

F-94A/B: < 526kt
F-94C: < 556kt

http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f94_1.html
http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f94_2.html
http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_fighters/f94_3.html

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 188
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 1:40:18 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
Operator of Buccaneer S.2A should be RAF instead of FAA.

Mig-15Bis should not have afterburner and its maximum speed need modification.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-15#Specifications_.28MiG-15bis.29

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 189
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 2:49:11 PM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
20mm M3 Single mount on new A-1 Skyraiders
20mm M3 Single [20 rnds] -> Typo? Should be 200 rnds per mount.

20mm MG-151 on Avia S-199, Hispano Aviacion HA-1112, and Messerschmitt Bf 109 G-6 should not use weapon record "20mm M197 Burst [25 rnds]"
At least, 30x burst is too much. 20mm MG-151 should have 200 round per mount, so it has 8x 25 round burst.

"20mm Cannon" on LaGG-3, MiG-3, Pe-2M Buck has 30x "20mm M197 Burst [25 rnds]"

LaGG-3 use 20 mm ShVAK Cannon with 120~160 round, that is 6~8x 20rnd burst.
http://www.ww2warbirds.net/ww2htmls/lagglagg3.html
http://www.battle-fields.com/commscentre/showthread.php?16888-Yak-LaGG-MiG

Mig-3 should use 1x 12.7mm + 2x 7.62mm
http://mig3.sovietwarplanes.com/mig3/guns.html

Pe-2M should use 3*20mm B-20 520rpg
http://www.ctrl-c.liu.se/misc/ram/pe-2m.html


RF-84 has 45x "12.7mm/50 MG x 4 Burst [100 rnds]"
I don't have exact number, but 300rpg is more reasonable.
So, it should be 12x "12.7mm/50 MG x 4 Burst [100 rnds]"

CF-100 Mk 3 has 45x "12.7mm/50 MG x 4 Burst [100 rnds]"
It should be 200 round per gun. So, 8x burst.
http://books.google.com.tw/books?id=DM5nHjzScJcC&pg=PA195&lpg=PA195&dq=CF-100+12.7mm+round&source=bl&ots=opX2yBcGKP&sig=_MVnaLFSnbUcUX_gyiIm5XCO0D4&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ei=krWYUqisEsfqkAWM-IDQCw&ved=0CGIQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=CF-100%2012.7mm%20round&f=false

SUU-23/A on RAF Phantom II should have 12x 100rnds burst instead of 24x 100rnds burst
http://www.harpoondatabases.com/encyclopedia/Entry2417.aspx
http://books.google.com.tw/books?id=sOpMuLgVy0sC&pg=PA73&lpg=PA73&dq=SUU-23+1200+round&source=bl&ots=mX4VIbRPvv&sig=V-XQcTu-FXHeAKsESmoHVDV_b1E&hl=zh-TW&sa=X&ei=graYUpfqDIiRkgWtlYHoAQ&ved=0CEMQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=SUU-23%201200%20round&f=false

SUU-16/A on F-4C has 225x 100rnds burst. (!)
Should be 12x 100rnds


< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 11/29/2013 3:50:44 PM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 190
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 6:57:19 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline
Updated
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

F9F-2 should not able to do supercruise.

Its max speed should smaller than 500kt.

http://www.joebaugher.com/navy_fighters/f9_2.html



_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 191
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/29/2013 7:12:17 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline
Updated
quote:

ORIGINAL: fool12342000

F-84B/C/E/G should not have same maximum speed as F-84F. (Straight-wing vs Swept-wing)
And they should not have afterburner. (Since F-94 is the first one with afterburner.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84_Thunderjet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84F_Thunderstreak







_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 192
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 12:10:18 AM   
HudsonGame


Posts: 43
Joined: 10/5/2013
Status: offline
One aircraft that was around until 1949, was the B-19 (well, XB-19). It was never put into production, but it might have been. It was by far the largest aircraft in existence until the B-36. It would be interesting to see it in the CWDB.

< Message edited by HudsonGame -- 11/30/2013 1:11:30 AM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 193
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 4:14:31 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
MiG-9's max speed should smaller than 494kt instead of 565kt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-9


MiG-3's max speed should smaller than 346kt instead of 410kt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-3

(kt/mph conversion ?)


< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 11/30/2013 5:17:22 AM >

(in reply to HudsonGame)
Post #: 194
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 4:33:59 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
MiG-17 should equip VK-1 engine. (No afterburner)
Only after MiG-17F introduced, it got VK-1F with afterburner.
And it is not a supersonic fighter. Need to lower max speed.

Mig-17 should be Fresco A instead of Fresco B.

http://www.mig17.com/Specifications.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-17

< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 11/30/2013 5:35:03 AM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 195
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 5:05:06 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
MiG-19's military speed should be 520kt (To match J-6's specs in DB3K.)

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 196
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 5:22:49 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F3D's maximum speed should smaller than 460kt instead of 900kt.
And it has no afterburner.

F-10A/F-10B should be Fighter instead of Electronic Warfare

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/F3D-2_Skyknight_SAC_ww-_15_February_1952.pdf

< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 12/1/2013 12:08:12 PM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 197
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 11/30/2013 6:01:30 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
FJ-1 should not able to do supercruise.
Its max speed should smaller than 510kt

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/FJ-1_Fury_SAC_-_1_May_1949.pdf

It seems FJ-1 have same spec with FJ-2 in CWDB400. (Length, height, and weight)
But they are different plane. (Straight wing vs Sweep wing.)
FJ-1 should not have same agility as FJ-2(2.5).

< Message edited by fool12342000 -- 12/1/2013 12:14:40 PM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 198
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/1/2013 11:17:18 AM   
e2204588

 

Posts: 170
Joined: 7/12/2013
Status: offline
F3H is not a supersonic jet.
So, its max speed should be much lower. (<563kt instead of 900kt.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_F3H_Demon#Specifications_.28F3H-2.29

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 199
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/6/2013 7:57:51 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
The B-70 has a tail gun that I've never seen any mention of in actual proposals, and it should be removed.

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 200
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/8/2013 11:01:04 AM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
I see in the EC-121D/Q Warning Star variants:

APS-45: AS/SS/2D, range 150, it should be 3D and very probaly not SS capable (I've it with máximum range 120, but I don't remember the range source, probably some books about the Constellation).

APS-95: AS/SS/3D, range 250, but should be only 2D.

If not, other APS-45 equipped variants (with APS-20) should not be capables of heigth-finding detections.

As hints, in my personal tables about the EC-121, compilated some time ago from many books:

PO-2W/WV-2/EC-121K (10/1954-1979): APS-20, APS-45, ESM. USNx142.

EC-121M (WV-2Q) (1960+): APS-20, APS-45, ESM. USNx12, SIGINT.

EC-121N (WV-3) (1955-1971): APS-20, APS-45, RWR. USN.

RC-121C (1953?+): APS-20, APS-45, ESM. USAFx10.

RC/EC-121D (1954+): APS-20, APS-45, ESM. USAFx74.

EC-121H (1960+): APS-95 (AS/SS,2D,250 nm), APS-103 (3D, 168 nm), ESM. USAFx42. Upgrade, SAGE capable.

EC-121Q Gold Digger (1962?+): APS-95 (AS/SS,2D,250 nm), APS-103 (3D, 168 nm), ESM. USAFx4, U-2 Dragonlady mission support, 966th Sq. at McCoy AFB.

EC-121R Batcat (1967-1971?): APS-42 (SS, 200? nm), ESM. USAFx30, 10 equipped with ECM.

EC-121S Coronet Solo: Pennsylvania ANGx5, for TV broadcasting. Also NC-121J.

EC-121T (1968?-1978): APS-95, not upper dome in many, ESM. USAFx22, employed for ELINT.


< Message edited by Broncepulido -- 12/8/2013 12:03:16 PM >

(in reply to Coiler12)
Post #: 201
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/8/2013 1:48:12 PM   
Dobey455

 

Posts: 445
Joined: 12/28/2007
Status: offline
Hi Guys,

Thanks for all the updates, Devs - great work.
A small request - the RAN A4G Skyhawks (A/C 1639 in the CWDB) used "buddy" refueling packs fairly regularly, but these are not available in the load outs.
Is it possible to add buddy refuel stores for this A/C?

Thanks for considering.

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 202
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/12/2013 1:31:45 PM   
Coiler12

 

Posts: 1203
Joined: 10/13/2013
Status: offline
The Yak-25RV, a heavily modified version specifically built to fly higher, still has the lower 12,200 meter ceiling of the ordinary fighter version.

Two sources put the ceiling of the Yak-25RV at 20,500 meters and 21,000 meters, respectfully.

(in reply to Dobey455)
Post #: 203
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/13/2013 4:26:10 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
I'm not sure if there were any important differences between these aircraft and the ones sold to other countries, but some of Yugoslavia's air force seems to be missing for the 1960s.

Mig-21F-13 Fishbed C
F/RF-84G jun53-jul74 -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84_Thunderjet
F-86: SFR Yugoslav Air Force, Acquired 130 U.S.-made F-86Ds and operated them between 1961 and 1974. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-86D_Sabre
F-86: Yugoslav Air Force, Acquired 121 Canadair CL-13s and F-86Es, operating them in several fighter aviation regiments between 1956 and 1971. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-86_Sabre#Operators

http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/yugoslavia/airforce/organization/1960/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_Air_Force#Aircraft_inventory_1965-1985

Yugoslavia purchased its first batch of MiG-21s in 1962 from the Soviet Union. In the period from 1962 to the early 1980s Yugoslavia had purchased up to 216 MiG-21s in nine variants." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-21#Yugoslavia



< Message edited by Mgellis -- 12/13/2013 5:27:17 AM >

(in reply to e2204588)
Post #: 204
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/14/2013 2:04:24 AM   
Mgellis


Posts: 2054
Joined: 8/18/2007
Status: offline
Not sure if this is a bug or a design issue with the ship in question. I cannot get the Andrea Doria (C 553) to launch her helicopters. When I checked, it says the helicopters are waiting for an elevator, but there is no elevator listed as part of the ship.

So...I don't know if there should be an elevator, or if the hanger should be changed--am I right that it is the type of hanger that tells the game whether or not an elevator, runway access path, etc. is needed?--or is it something else?

I'm trying to use the Andrea Doria as part of a scenario, so I hope someone can figure out if there is something wrong with the entry so it can be fixed or if I'm just doing something wrong with the aircraft. Thanks.

(Here is a copy of the file.)


Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Mgellis -- 12/14/2013 3:09:27 AM >

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 205
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/16/2013 1:54:17 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline
Hi thanks Ill look into it
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

Not sure if this is a bug or a design issue with the ship in question. I cannot get the Andrea Doria (C 553) to launch her helicopters. When I checked, it says the helicopters are waiting for an elevator, but there is no elevator listed as part of the ship.

So...I don't know if there should be an elevator, or if the hanger should be changed--am I right that it is the type of hanger that tells the game whether or not an elevator, runway access path, etc. is needed?--or is it something else?

I'm trying to use the Andrea Doria as part of a scenario, so I hope someone can figure out if there is something wrong with the entry so it can be fixed or if I'm just doing something wrong with the aircraft. Thanks.

(Here is a copy of the file.)




_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 206
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/16/2013 1:55:03 PM   
.Sirius


Posts: 1404
Joined: 1/18/2013
Status: offline
Hi will update the countries orbat to reflect :)
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mgellis

I'm not sure if there were any important differences between these aircraft and the ones sold to other countries, but some of Yugoslavia's air force seems to be missing for the 1960s.

Mig-21F-13 Fishbed C
F/RF-84G jun53-jul74 -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_F-84_Thunderjet
F-86: SFR Yugoslav Air Force, Acquired 130 U.S.-made F-86Ds and operated them between 1961 and 1974. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_F-86D_Sabre
F-86: Yugoslav Air Force, Acquired 121 Canadair CL-13s and F-86Es, operating them in several fighter aviation regiments between 1956 and 1971. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-86_Sabre#Operators

http://www.vojska.net/eng/armed-forces/yugoslavia/airforce/organization/1960/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_Air_Force#Aircraft_inventory_1965-1985

Yugoslavia purchased its first batch of MiG-21s in 1962 from the Soviet Union. In the period from 1962 to the early 1980s Yugoslavia had purchased up to 216 MiG-21s in nine variants." -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan-Gurevich_MiG-21#Yugoslavia





_____________________________

Paul aka Sirius
Command Developer
Warfaresims
Cold War Data Base 1946-1979 Author

Old radar men never die - Their echoes fade away in accordance with the inverse fourth power law

(in reply to Mgellis)
Post #: 207
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/16/2013 7:50:34 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
Against as is usually reported, the Essex-class carriers converted in LPH, USS Boxer LPH-4, USS Valley Forge LPH-8 and USS Princeton LPH-5, get only a máximum speed of 25 knots (not 33 knots), as four of the eight boilers were removed, and the installed power fall from 150000 shp to 75000 shp, as stated in Norman Friedman's "US Aircraft Carriers, an Illustrated Design History", USNI 1983, page 369, or here:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/10/11/1104.htm
(the navysource page reports 33 knots speed, BUT cites only 75000 shp, and that motivated me to research about the issue).

(in reply to .Sirius)
Post #: 208
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/17/2013 9:21:19 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
Reading about the Red Storm scenario in project, I remembered this link I hope can help (I don't know if these radar sites are implemented in the database):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_Air_Force_aircraft_control_and_warning_squadrons#Sites_Outside_the_United_States
The Iceland sites are designated H-xx, and in each individual entry of Iceland radar sites on Wikipedia are listed the radar types of each site.
Other link with links to similar stuff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_USAF_Aerospace_Defense_Command_General_Surveillance_Radar_Stations

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 209
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests - 12/19/2013 5:53:12 PM   
Broncepulido

 

Posts: 385
Joined: 9/26/2013
Status: offline
I see none Sea King variant is equipped with sonobuoys !!!!! (I was verifing platforms for a possible scenario)

(in reply to Broncepulido)
Post #: 210
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Command: Modern Operations series >> Mods and Scenarios >> RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.953