RE: Standardized Artwork Set

RE: Standardized Artwork Set (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Current Games From Matrix.] >> [World War II] >> War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945

Message

Cathartes -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 12:33:38 AM)
small update: complete set of jptops available for CHS (should also work reasonable well for stock). In the plane downloads section.

GaryChildress -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 1:51:52 AM)
Absolutely beautiful Cathartes! You are the king of aircraft art by far! I look forward to some Allied tops, as well as tops for AE! Keep up the great work! [&o][&o][&o][&o]

Big B -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 2:27:05 AM)
Cathartes is in a class by himself as far as I care.[&o][&o][&o] quote: ORIGINAL: Gary Childress Absolutely beautiful Cathartes! You are the king of aircraft art by far! I look forward to some Allied tops, as well as tops for AE! Keep up the great work! [&o][&o][&o][&o]

TOMLABEL -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 5:01:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Big B Cathartes is in a class by himself as far as I care.[&o][&o][&o] quote: ORIGINAL: Gary Childress Absolutely beautiful Cathartes! You are the king of aircraft art by far! I look forward to some Allied tops, as well as tops for AE! Keep up the great work! [&o][&o][&o][&o] Couldn't agree more!!!!!![&o][&o][&o]

undercovergeek -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 5:08:49 PM)
out of curiosity - if you scaled the planes so that a fighter was its true size next to a bomber would the image get sharper and possible to add more detail - or would the image be too small

GaryChildress -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 5:14:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: undercovergeek out of curiosity - if you scaled the planes so that a fighter was its true size next to a bomber would the image get sharper and possible to add more detail - or would the image be too small If fighters were their true size next to a B-29 plane side obviously there will be a loss in detail. Bigger is always better when it comes to detail. Personally I don't think scaled plane art would be worth the trouble.

Cathartes -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 6:29:58 PM)
I agree with Gary. These planes are already minuscule. Scaling them properly is maddening, and you would be looking at some fighters with a wingspan of 12 pixels or less--impossible to show reasonable detail. All of it is a matter of taste and philosophy: I get that scale is more of a realism/immersion factor for some than the actual appearance of the art. If/when there's a WITP II that supports higher screen resolutions proper scale and more detailed art could be used for aircraft. [image]local://upfiles/2187/113AC21AD11449D5A0AC49EA7109AA57.jpg[/image]

Dixie -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (3/25/2009 7:27:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Cathartes I agree with Gary. These planes are already minuscule. Scaling them properly is maddening, and you would be looking at some fighters with a wingspan of 12 pixels or less--impossible to show reasonable detail. All of it is a matter of taste and philosophy: I get that scale is more of a realism/immersion factor for some than the actual appearance of the art. If/when there's a WITP II that supports higher screen resolutions proper scale and more detailed art could be used for aircraft. [image]local://upfiles/2187/113AC21AD11449D5A0AC49EA7109AA57.jpg[/image] I'd agree with that more or less. What I tend do do is have 4E planes use the entire 'box', 2E and single engine bombers take up less and fighters are smaller than those. I tend to apply that to both sides and any tops I've done. That way there's some indication of scale without any actual tiny aeroplanes [:D]

VI66_slith -> RE: Standardized Artwork Set (4/26/2014 12:15:01 AM)
Anyone still here? If so I'm looking for the background art used for making the shipbacks and shils??? If anyone could send them to me I'd be entirely grateful [:)][:D][&o][&o]

Page: << < prev 18 19 20 21 [22]

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

0.8125