RE: Criticall hits (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition



Message

rockmedic109 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 10:39:09 AM)

I seem to recall a lot of forum fuss over something called a Spud Launcher as well.



Sardaukar -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 1:18:51 PM)

Another thing, probably is not in AE...

Would be nice to allow CVEs in ASW TFs, to make real life "hunter-killer" ASW groups, like they had in Atlantic.

I have tried with CVEs in CVE Escort following ASW FT...but I don't remember what happened. And I didn't know if ASW TF should follow CVE TF or vise versa...[:'(] So ability to have CVEs in ASW TF would be nice.



BB57 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 1:30:02 PM)

Will ASW TF ships be editable?



wworld7 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 2:23:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish

BOINK(tm) isn't as good as KABLAMMO(tm)

[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]


Well, how about KaBoink!(tm)



Yes it is, and the website for it is probably available, so lower marketing costs.[:D][:D][:D]



Mike Scholl -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 2:23:24 PM)

"Will ASW TF ships be editable? "

Currently you can put any 4 ASW-capable ships available into a dedicated "ASW TF".



RevRick -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 3:01:58 PM)

Gentlemen, we must not forget the United States Navy's device for warning ships that they had been targeted for a torpedo attack. This device was to be incorporated into the torpedoes used in submarines in a 1 in 10 ratio, and was called the KaBong warning system. This ingenious attempt at courtesy despite international conflict was used to alert the targeted ship to allow the passengers and crew to get ready for their eminent destruction. Unfortunately, it also alerted the escort forces. Further, it seems that an ordering error produced far more of these devices than were necessary (the ratio became 9 in 10 instead of 1 in 10). The Navy, ever mindful of its budgetary responsibility, allowed for the over shipped devices to be used. It took many months for the shipping error to be corrected. In the end, Kabong was discontinued as an unwarranted expense, and a confusion of mission requirements for the delivery system.



Don Bowen -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 3:10:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sardaukar

Another thing, probably is not in AE...

Would be nice to allow CVEs in ASW TFs, to make real life "hunter-killer" ASW groups, like they had in Atlantic.

I have tried with CVEs in CVE Escort following ASW FT...but I don't remember what happened. And I didn't know if ASW TF should follow CVE TF or vise versa...[:'(] So ability to have CVEs in ASW TF would be nice.


No plans for Atlantic-style Hunter-Killer groups.





Don Bowen -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 3:11:15 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BB57

Will ASW TF ships be editable?


Editable in what way?




Ron Saueracker -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 3:21:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen


quote:

ORIGINAL: BB57

Will ASW TF ships be editable?


Editable in what way?




A little Frank's Hot Sauce might help the taste.[:'(]



BB57 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 6:17:17 PM)

I'm bad. Use three words when ten would do. Let me try again. Will ASW be editable to include CVE if we want to mod to include Atlantic style ASW task forces?

Thanks to the AE crew for all the work you have put in on making this monster better.

BTW since AE's release date is not going to be told to the waiting masses, when will 1.807 be released?[:D]

Steve



wworld7 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 6:21:18 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BB57

I'm bad. Use three words when ten would do. Let me try again. Will ASW be editable to include CVE if we want to mod to include Atlantic style ASW task forces?


If you look at post #486 Don says no, if I understand correctly.



BB57 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 6:32:40 PM)

I reposted because reading my original question it didn't make sense to me and I asked it!

Steve



JWE -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 6:52:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: flipperwasirish
quote:

ORIGINAL: BB57
I'm bad. Use three words when ten would do. Let me try again. Will ASW be editable to include CVE if we want to mod to include Atlantic style ASW task forces?

If you look at post #486 Don says no, if I understand correctly.

Hello gentlemen,

flipper, you are correct. The different types of ships that can be included in the different types of TFs is determined by a table in the code. This is not editable.



BB57 -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 7:25:54 PM)

Thank you



Dili -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 8:13:49 PM)

Well it is not the carrier that is in ASW mission but its planes so i don't understand the issue.



Dili -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 8:56:00 PM)

Will it be possible to force one side to take a certain amout of warship ship tonnage from scenario instead of having a retirement date in a specific ship?
I mean if a BB that is about to be retired from scenario is sunk before that eventually would have been an adjustment and another ship would probably be retired. ?



JWE -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 9:42:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dili

Will it be possible to force one side to take a certain amout of warship ship tonnage from scenario instead of having a retirement date in a specific ship?
I mean if a BB that is about to be retired from scenario is sunk before that eventually would have been an adjustment and another ship would probably be retired. ?

I have no idea what that means.



treespider -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 11:26:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JWE


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dili

Will it be possible to force one side to take a certain amout of warship ship tonnage from scenario instead of having a retirement date in a specific ship?
I mean if a BB that is about to be retired from scenario is sunk before that eventually would have been an adjustment and another ship would probably be retired. ?

I have no idea what that means.



I think what he is saying is - if a BB that was scheduled to be withdrawn, is sunk before withdrawl, will the player be forced to withdrawl ships of an equivalent tonnage to the tonnage of the BB that was sunk and is no longer available to be withdrawn.



JWE -> RE: Criticall hits (3/2/2009 11:40:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider

I think what he is saying is - if a BB that was scheduled to be withdrawn, is sunk before withdrawl, will the player be forced to withdrawl ships of an equivalent tonnage to the tonnage of the BB that was sunk and is no longer available to be withdrawn.

If that is the question, then ... no.



Dili -> RE: Criticall hits (3/3/2009 12:19:38 AM)

Yes it was that the question. Thanks Treespider and thanks for reply.



Skyland -> Escort by sub (3/12/2009 11:35:28 AM)

Will it be possible to assign a sub as convoy escort (like it was done the Atlantic, Artic and Indian Ocean) ?



Yamato hugger -> RE: Escort by sub (3/12/2009 2:05:30 PM)

No. You could have a sub "follow" a transport TF however (I think subs can follow anyways - will double check).

Edit: Yes they can.



Ron Saueracker -> RE: Escort by sub (3/12/2009 3:52:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

No. You could have a sub "follow" a transport TF however (I think subs can follow anyways - will double check).

Edit: Yes they can.


Now, assuming we have sub vs sub combat in AE, Clark Gable can get his arse shot off again and again in AE by the Jap sub operating with Akikaze in the Bungo Straits![:)]



treespider -> RE: Escort by sub (3/12/2009 3:56:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

No. You could have a sub "follow" a transport TF however (I think subs can follow anyways - will double check).

Edit: Yes they can.


Now, assuming we have sub vs sub combat in AE, Clark Gable can get his arse shot off again and again in AE by the Jap sub operating with Akikaze in the Bungo Straits![:)]



"Yes We Can!!!"



Ron Saueracker -> RE: Escort by sub (3/12/2009 4:13:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: treespider


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker


quote:

ORIGINAL: Yamato hugger

No. You could have a sub "follow" a transport TF however (I think subs can follow anyways - will double check).

Edit: Yes they can.


Now, assuming we have sub vs sub combat in AE, Clark Gable can get his arse shot off again and again in AE by the Jap sub operating with Akikaze in the Bungo Straits![:)]



"Yes We Can!!!"


Whoohoo!!! "Due to conditions of special advantage, I am taking this boat into the Bungo Straits."



wworld7 -> RE: Escort by sub (3/12/2009 10:52:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Whoohoo!!! "Due to conditions of special advantage, I am taking this boat into the Bungo Straits."



Is the goat coming with you?[:)][:)][:)]



Ron Saueracker -> RE: Escort by sub (3/13/2009 5:04:00 AM)

The goat disappeared during the tornado but I've heard a few cute lambs moved in!![;)]



Gunner98 -> RE: Escort by sub (3/13/2009 8:06:07 AM)

I suspect that the Kabab shop had something to do with to AWOL Goat![X(]



Dili -> RE: Escort by sub (3/13/2009 9:35:44 AM)

Maybe a shark eat it...



Yamato hugger -> RE: Escort by sub (3/13/2009 12:40:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

The goat disappeared during the tornado but I've heard a few cute lambs moved in!![;)]


So in a few months you will have baby veals running around looking at you and saying "Daaaaaa deeeee"? [:D]



Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.28125