Bullwinkle58 -> RE: Japanese land in OZ!! (8/19/2014 8:32:24 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: JocMeister When I talked to him about it sometime ago he said that if we stopped playing at(if) AV we were just wasting time. DonŽt want to bail out on him because I believe AV is unavoidable. Moral dilemma to say the least. I guess the only easy solution is to try and force myself to continue playing to avoid AV and hope you guys slap me on the fingers if I donŽt. On the first part, I know that's a common thought around here. The first year is hard and kind of tedious for both sides due to all the expanding, falling back, initial building and logistics, pilot training, etc, etc. But OTOH, auto-vic is set at a ratio where if you get to it you really did lose. It takes an Allied position so much worse than history that it's pretty hard to come back to even an average position by 1945. OTOOH though, as I never get tired of saying, the Allies have to get one to win at all. If you did get one in, say, Feb. 1945, he would want to keep playing into 1946 just because you can? I don't know the answer to that. On the second part I don't consider it a moral dilemma. I save that word for pretty important things. Maybe an ethical dilemma. Or maybe not even that. If you did your best and got beat inside the parameters of the game there's no dilemma I really see. Quitting early is a different question, and simply disappearing, as so many people around here do, is despicable. But in any game--tennis, poker, soccer--when you reach the end and a winner is declared you don't keep playing. If you lose a tennis match in straight sets nobody would consider you unethical if you declined to keep hitting the ball over without keeping score, getting smash after smash in return. Then there's the question of time and the question of learning. If he gets AV in early 1943 what would it take to "finish" the war to summer 1945? 1500 lifespan hours? More? A standard work year over here is 2000 hours as a point of comparison. Which is up to you, if you're learning new things and it's interesting. Is it? If it's not, if it's painful to lose every day, and you play to AV and it goes against you, there's no obligation to volunteer 1500 hours you could spend with your wife and kids. As I said before, start a new game, maybe with him, maybe another, maybe same set-up and scenario, maybe another. And learn new things. I've had two times in my game with Loka where I felt like quitting. I told him both times, probably sounded whiny. But I got past it and he was a gentleman about it. If, however, he gets to AV, I don't see the value in playing on. Some might relish trying to take Kwajalein in 1945, but I don't see the point. If you baked in that much bad throw the cake out and mix a new one.
|
|
|
|