RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report



Message


rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 8:11:04 PM)

ND39. Allied Resource Lending.

The CW gives 1 oil to the French. They've designated the Canadian oil RP to be that oil. This agreement was made for 1 turn only and will be reconsidered turn by turn. I wanted the agreement to default off and have to be renewed than the other way (i.e., defaulted on and have to be cancelled).

Roll for Initiative "Orders" for Pat.

I completed the allied resource lending phases. After the axis phases it'll be the roll for the initiative.

The allies will elect to move first if they win the initiative.

The allies will not have the chance to ask for a re-roll so that's not a consideration.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/5828D1347BDB4C39885D3CE0005C022B.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 9:16:38 PM)

Catch, up
No change to the axis preliminary production during the final production phase.
Builds:
Germany: 2x MIL, FIG2, Mot-div, ARM HQ
Italy: NAV2
Japan: Mech-div, ENG-div, 2x MIL

Lending the Germans started lending 1 oil to Italy.

Attached the game file at the ND39 weather phase for those interesting in perusing the map.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 9:17:47 PM)

Here is the pictures of the initiative rolls. Germany did elect to go first.


[image]local://upfiles/47448/BF96FCB05B32470F9E504DDE8931DD7C.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 9:18:41 PM)

And the first impulse weather.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/0CD06BA626E645598225C1D53CB311FB.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 11:38:15 PM)

After long discussion in Berlin and Rome (interrupted by Portugal's victory), the Italians DOW the CW and add one chit to the entry pool. The Hungarian and Bulgarian claims on Romanian are allowed.



[image]local://upfiles/47448/DFA101B31A0C41CB81053AB559F72D6B.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 11:49:34 PM)

Axis actions


[image]local://upfiles/47448/698DA5EC3EAE470EACDA0CA1F3DF256B.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/10/2016 11:52:04 PM)

Italy flies a NAV to the 4 box of the W. Med. First naval move is a transport loaded with a 3-3 corp into the W. Med. The CW does get a chance at intercepting. If no French are included I believe they will be restricted to 0 surprise points. Do you want to intercept.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/3BBB6669E28E425FA7601201702A9FD7.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:05:19 AM)

No thank you.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:20:51 AM)

Here are all of the potential naval combats.
CVB axis roll 8, allies 9 -> no combat
CSV axis roll 9, allies 6 -> no combat
question on W. Med in next post.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/7CAE3BB44B7242EB8A64B354357BC7E6.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:22:26 AM)

I assume you will not commit the subs, but not 100% sure. They may sacrifice themselves for the convoys 20% of the time.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/73925E213327443A9C5D832ADA0DDA54.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:27:21 AM)

Yes, commit them and use them to save as many CPs as possible.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:37:33 AM)

W. Med axis rolled 6, allies 3 -> no combat
Bay of Biscay, CW can react the Albacore, Hampden and/or the Blenheim. Any?




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:41:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

W. Med axis rolled 6, allies 3 -> no combat
Bay of Biscay, CW can react the Albacore, Hampden and/or the Blenheim. Any?
Yes, please fly the Albacore from Liverpool into the 0-box.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:51:21 AM)

BoB both roll 8 -> no combat
E. Med, axis roll a 3 and the allies roll a 1. Net two surprise points for the Italians. Move it up to 2 damage and 3 aborts. Which two CP should be destroyed? I would guess the the french.




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 12:56:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ashkpa

BoB both roll 8 -> no combat
E. Med, axis roll a 3 and the allies roll a 1. Net two surprise points for the Italians. Move it up to 2 damage and 3 aborts. Which two CP should be destroyed? I would guess the the french.

The French it is. The allies abort to Malta and any French to Syria. Also, the allies will not stay for a second round. Handle any "voluntary" aborts the same way as the forced ones.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:01:38 AM)

There were only 3 CPs in the zone. Aborted the CW to Malta and destroyed the 2 FR.
Last naval combat item is in the Italian coast. I did not initiate combat, you have the choice with you sub to initiate.

[image]local://upfiles/47448/248C606F57544882957B71F879DD3304.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:02:32 AM)

No thank you.




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:04:12 AM)

By the way, PM Churchill is very unhappy with you, messing with the lifeline of England and all. [;)]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:15:50 AM)

quote:

By the way, PM Churchill is very unhappy with you, messing with the lifeline of England and all.


For the most part, we just sailed by and waved at the pretty ships.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:31:38 AM)

And our ground strikes are just dropping pamphlets.



[image]local://upfiles/47448/F7ED9823980D495F99370DDAB2F7A0CF.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:35:47 AM)

I'm going to have run and won't be back until late. Hopefully I can issue a set of standing orders that will get you through to the end of your impulse. If I left something out please use your best judgement on what to do.

1. No intercepts of ground strikes or ground support except for the CW when they can. CW will intercept to protect Gort or their two corps in Antwerp (and in that order) against ground strike. They will use their best available fighter.

2. No defensive ground support.

3. CW, French, Belgium if given the choice choose the assault CRT.

4. The Nationalist Chinese choose Blitz when that offers them a better chance to save their unit.

5. The ChiComm also choose Blitz under those conditions.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:36:16 AM)

Japanese ground strikes were just more paper.


[image]local://upfiles/47448/99327D5C0DED4B80B929D0F8909EA847.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 1:38:29 AM)

quote:

1. No intercepts of ground strikes or ground support except for the CW. CW will intercept to protect Gort or their two corps in Antwerp (and in that order) against ground strike. They will use their best available fighter.

2. No defensive ground support.

3. CW, French, Belgium if given the choice choose the assault CRT.

4. The Nationalist Chinese choose Blitz when that offers them a better chance to save their unit.

5. The ChiComm also choose Blitz under those conditions.

CW had no fighters in intercept range of Antwerp. Made no difference to my papers droppers. I will follow through with the other instructions.




Courtenay -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 2:31:20 AM)

Mistaken post. My apologies.




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 2:31:44 AM)

Japan moved through a Chinese city and made one attack.


[image]local://upfiles/47448/670F2D426B6A4DBC9AFFD6A5F714758B.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 2:32:40 AM)

End of impulse 1, ND39, conditions in China

[image]local://upfiles/47448/AE2AC0212F9D4F05BD499D7829D049EE.jpg[/image]




ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/11/2016 2:34:41 AM)

End conditions in Germany. Only a few land moves to prepare for later. Need better ground strikes or better weather. Preferably both. Back to the the supreme allied commander, ... Ronnie!!


[image]local://upfiles/47448/144EE1B8225340878E43C6A6BA80240F.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/12/2016 12:21:59 AM)

ND39. Allied #3. Actions.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/D007830A5AED4933BE0045A1149D2579.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/12/2016 12:28:06 AM)

ND39. Allied #3. Naval Air, CW.

During the naval air phase, the CW flies their Blenheim bomber into the 3 box of the Bay of Biscay.

[image]local://upfiles/31901/7DBB25DAB13148A6A1FC02410609C25D.jpg[/image]




rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/12/2016 12:50:11 AM)

ND39. Allied #3. Allied Naval Moves That You Can Intercept.

Do you wish to intercept any of the following? If yes, and unless you specific a unit, I'll use the weakest unit, requiring the least oil and in the lowest sea box to initiate.

(1) French, Marseilles. 2 BBs and 2 CAs to the West Med.

(2) RN, Malta. 3 BBs and 3 CAs to the Italian Coast.

(3) RN, Malta. 2 CAs to the East Med.

(4) RN, Gibraltar. CA loaded with 2-4 infantry Div to the West Med.

(5) RN, Gibraltar. BB to the West Med.

(6) RN, Gibraltar. 3 CAs to the West Med.

(7) RN, Plymouth. CV Courageous, 3 BBs to the Bay of Biscay and then to Cape St. Vincent. I'm not saying whether or not Cape St. Vincent is their final destination but this force intends to head at least that far. I'm giving this bit of intel away in order to speed play a bit. Otherwise, OPSEC is the word!

(8) RN, Plymouth. CV Ark Royal to the Bay of Biscay.

(9) RN, Liverpool. Queen Mary loaded with 7-3 infantry corps and CA to Bay of Biscay.

(10) RN, Liverpool. BB, CVL with no planes to Bay of Biscay.

(11) RN, Plymouth. CP to Bay of Biscay.

(12) RN, Plymouth. 2 CAs (older 3-2 ones) to Bay of Biscay.

(13) RN, Aden. 4 CAs to East Med.

(14) RN, Aden. 2 CPs to East Med.

(15) RN, Singapore. 2 CAs (6-movers) to East Med.

(16) RN, Singapore. 2 CAs (5-movers) to East Med.

These aren't necessarily all my planned CW naval moves, but the ones that I understand need an intercept or not decision from you. Also, these forces may move beyond their initial sea area, but for convenience and speed I won't ask again whether or not you want to intercept. Well, only if there's a critical one I've overlooked. [8D]




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.765625