RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> World in Flames >> After Action Report

Message

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2017 2:30:21 AM)
Yes, the RN will remain with the objective of sinking/aborting the Italian CP and breaking supply to the Italians in Libya. Bedtime now ... [>:] [>:] [>:]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2017 3:01:05 AM)
E Med Round 2, rolls of 3/5 result in allied finding and engaging the CW 3-box only. Naval Air. 2 SP used to decrease AA to ne. And 2 SP used to increase damage to D 3A. Applied first damage to BB. Damage roll of 7, aborted the BB (missed saving the correct image, sorry) First A against the CA was failed, so both units are aborted. 3rd round searches were 9/10 and combat ended. I aborted your ships to Suez. Feel free to move them elsewhere if desired. [image]local://upfiles/47448/CBA537319BBA4BA79C9A96E6026B43D1.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2017 3:03:09 AM)
Last naval combat decision is in the Bismark Sea, where the USA can initiate searches if they wish. [image]local://upfiles/47448/F392CD0614B1437093237D1C2D3624EA.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2017 10:58:36 PM)
The US declines.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (7/31/2017 11:48:33 PM)
Three ground strikes. 2 with artillery and 1 with a plane. You can intercept. I have a Me109 that can counter-intercept. Do you wish to fly? [image]local://upfiles/47448/49FFE474D2004EC08AAB91621D93AB72.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 2:06:01 AM)
Intercept. Fighter will target plane attempting the ground strike.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 2:26:51 AM)
ND42 i13 GS Air to Air over GS cleared the bomber and then the Germans left the area. Only one GS hit. [image]local://upfiles/47448/0010A069DB7E4E099BEB27D0D04684BC.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:23:01 AM)
ND42 i13: Land Attacks Three land attacks, all at high odds. I assumed you would choose assault on the two where you had the choice. [image]local://upfiles/47448/5F18E7902E1E4D95ADCD1EF71D0D4C6B.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:24:51 AM)
turn ended with a roll of 1. The Allies get to place a partisan in China. [image]local://upfiles/47448/B007752E895849CEB9658D2483F58BD9.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:44:52 AM)
Here is the partisan screen. [image]local://upfiles/47448/33E1E1CFBCE9418B8B641637B0575EB7.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:45:54 AM)
Here is the destroyed pool for ND42. Russia lost more than they are building. [image]local://upfiles/47448/5A04F6060B9D41FA97D58FA2D335AA2F.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:47:28 AM)
Next several post show the situation at then end of 1942. Here is the East Front (sorry about the low magnification). [image]local://upfiles/47448/5DFB807089904570B83699237074F180.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:48:23 AM)
And the Iberian Peninsula: Stalemate? [image]local://upfiles/47448/78424F66FBAF409DA34385B3115F9E7D.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:49:55 AM)
East Med and Eygpt. Note, CW has no transport or CP in the East Med, impacting the supply situation. [image]local://upfiles/47448/8BDE1383E03F45F7A6A306B2AEF803D2.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:50:51 AM)
And lastly the Siberian Front [image]local://upfiles/47448/92F71CF538224B80891EC15916E7C7EF.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 3:55:42 AM)
No image for the Pacific. Not much changed. The US took Saipan and the Japanese retook it. There was a large naval engagement in the Marianas. Air power was about equal, but with surprise I (axis) made it a surface. Great damage control by the allies limited the impact to the Enterprise and the Portland being damaged. The JP put the Yamato in front to absorb their X and promptly rolled a 1 making it a great move (any other JP ship would have sunk). The USA then aborted the zone.

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/1/2017 11:18:28 PM)
Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1942. End of Turn. ChiComm Partisan. A ChiComm partisan spawns and denies the Japanese 1 non-RP that they've been using for production. [image]local://upfiles/31901/9BB4E67321D94A2DBC1B7FDCD241F091.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/3/2017 4:28:25 AM)
ND42 Axis Oil Usage. Heavy oil usage by the Japanese, 6 expended. Germans expended 4 and the Italians 1. All units reorganized. Numbers were right on at 6.4, 4.4 and 1.3. [image]local://upfiles/47448/265FD1B4F8F8401F8E4BF22CA4F4B3A7.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/5/2017 3:16:41 PM)
Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Use Oil. Allies. [image]local://upfiles/31901/D3CB0786F6A34B378EFED526371AF863.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/6/2017 11:19:57 PM)
Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1940. End of Turn. Final Production. Allies. [image]local://upfiles/31901/B42D34D8EEEF463DA0E16B7231352130.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/7/2017 1:14:04 AM)
ND42 Axis Builds: Germany (44 BP, 3 saved oil) save 6 BP (6) 4x pilots (8) GAR (2) FIG3 (3) NAV3 (3) LND3 (3) 2x sub-fd (2) mech-div (3) MOT (4) arm-div (4) MIL (2) AA (4) Italy (11 BP, 1 saved oil) 1x pilot (2) 1x CP (1) sub-rp (1) LND4 (4) LND3 (3) Japan (25 BP, 3 saved oil) 4x pilots (8) FIG2 (2) CVP1 (1) CVP0 (0) 2x CP (2) BB-rp (2) Yamato CA-rp (1) fast CA in pool INF (3) MTN (4) TERR (2)

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/8/2017 11:28:59 PM)
Turn 20. Nov/Dec 1942. End of Turn. Allied Builds. CW(29): Arm HQ(8), CP(1) x 3, Terr(2), Par Div(3), Mot(4), Pilot(2) x 2, Lnd(3), CA Repair(1), CVP(1) France(0): USA(62): O-Chit(15), Sub 2nd(2), Sub 2nd(1), CV Repair(2), CA Repair(1) x 2, CV 2nd(3), Amph 2nd(4), CP(1) x 2, Pilot(2) x 3, CVP(1), FTR(2), Lnd(4), Mil(2) x 3, Mar Div(3), Arm(6), Mech Div(3) USSR(26): Cav(2), MTN(4), Inf(3) x 5, FTR(3), Pilot(2)

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/14/2017 12:57:50 AM)
JF43 Image of the Axis reinforcements and scrap decisions. Germany increased lending to Italy to 4 resources, 1 of them being oil. [image]local://upfiles/47448/E887DA0286E54CEA9BF1DBB50B93883C.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/15/2017 11:21:39 PM)
Turn 21. Jan/Feb 1943. Allied Resource Lending. No Changes. Initiative. Axis 7 + 1 = 8, Allied 2. With the allies unable to request a re-roll the axis win the initiative. Do the axis wish to move first or second this turn? If so, it's probably easiest if you just set the die rolls with the turn you sent me and go from there. If you wish me to move first then I'll do the same and go with the turn I received. [image]local://upfiles/31901/8879C0A45C16402B845441814630E78C.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/15/2017 11:58:15 PM)
Axis did decide to move first. The East front situation was just to tempting. Weather JF43 i 1. Results pretty good, though with rain and storm there will not be any big sweeping moves. I will try to get to this tonight. [image]local://upfiles/47448/283FB09AE6254718B2BB8CE3EC2864E9.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/16/2017 4:27:45 AM)
ND43 i1 Naval Combat Actions: Japan combined, Germany and Italy lands Germany flies a NAV to the 4-box of the E. Med. Japan flies a NAV to the 4-box of the Arabian Sea and a NAV to the 3-box of the China Sea. Japan moves 2 sub from NEI to the Read Sea and 1 to the SE Indian Ocean (all one naval move). A CA with a Mar-div moves from Saipan to the 4-box of the Bismarck Sea. 3 Possible combats shown below. In the first search rolls the CW CA in the Red Sea gets the drop on the Japanese subs (rolls of 8/1). You have 5 surprise points and I see three options. 1) avoid combat 2) make it a sub combat, take no damage and inflict 2A 3) let it be a surface combat, take an A and inflict D 3A. (There is a small chance that I could have a sub remain for round two, but you are also likely to damage a submarine) I could not decide which you would want - option 1 or 3 (2 did not seem likely). [image]local://upfiles/47448/1B371299E6F643589EFBA628C2A6AB99.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/16/2017 12:37:59 PM)
Red Sea. I'll take option 3.

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/16/2017 2:09:30 PM)
Good Choice. You passed your A and I failed the D and enough A's to send everybody home. In the Arabian Sea search rolls of 9/2 resulted in no combat. (I reacted another plane out to this zone). In the SE Indian Ocean search rolls of 7/3 resulted in no combat. [image]local://upfiles/47448/3230EA1E611644EAB253660F20E8857E.jpg[/image]

ashkpa -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/16/2017 2:35:16 PM)
ND43 i1 Ground Strikes 3 ground strikes: Lisbon, Stavropol, and Vlad. You can only intercept at Lisbon. A lone Italian FB is bombing Lisbon, image below shows the situation and potential interceptors. What to you wish to do? {There are probably US interceptors as well, I forgot to look for those} [image]local://upfiles/47448/95607C6D649C4C799F488A24D23546CC.jpg[/image]

rkr1958 -> RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR (8/16/2017 11:09:30 PM)
I'll intercept with the RAF 6-strength Mosquito II fighter based two hexes south of Lisbon.

Page: << < prev 84 85 [86] 87 88 next > >>

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.515625