RE: The question to ask about The Italians (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


Aurelian -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/7/2020 9:48:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: UP844


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Here is an interesting read:

the wages of destruction

https://www.bing.com/search?q=the+wages+of+destruction+pdf&FORM=QSRE8

Full text of "Tooze, Adam The Wages Of Destruction The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy"

https://archive.org/stream/ToozeAdamTheWagesOfDestructionTheMakingAndBreakingOfTheNaziEconomy/Tooze%2C%20Adam%20-%20The%20Wages%20of%20Destruction%20The%20Making%20and%20Breaking%20of%20the%20Nazi%20Economy_djvu.txt


Thanks for reporting this book!! [&o]


You are welcome. You get to read about the economic problems with managing the Nazi German economy and why they just could not produce more.
warspite1

+1 I will need to keep funds available for Taranto, but would like to get this too.



I have it. It is an excellent read.




Aurelian -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/7/2020 9:52:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

[image]local://upfiles/14086/810C239344834442987E2DA50B46E1F4.jpg[/image]

[image]local://upfiles/14086/81218BDC8A3846029A4FE2574ED24CDD.jpg[/image]

[image]local://upfiles/14086/7BAA36048EB94E4AA4F28FC49640792C.jpg[/image]



But how can that sentence be taken out of context or mis-understood? Look at it this way:

A US military study confirms that supply for the Greek 1st Army was centred on the port of Salonika. What does that mean? Could that have been the sole port of supply?, the primary port? What? Well they go onto say that if Salonika was taken then that would cut off their supply. That would suggest that Salonika was either the sole supply port or the one that provided the vast majority of supply doesn't it?

Let's be honest here. I don't know. You don't know. So I've used this US military study as my supporting evidence. What do you do? Do you ask to see the military study? Have you shown the slightest interest in the study? No.

Okay, so why are you so keen to rubbish such a source without even seeing it yourself? Presumably you do that because you have evidence yourself that the Greek 1st Army was supplied from Athens? But you don't. You don't have any evidence from any military sources - whether Greek, British, German or Italian. You don't have any 3rd party sources either.

So what convinces you that the US military guys are total idiots who have no clue what they are putting their name to? Well, you have some maps from a WWII Atlas and from Wiki.... And that shows there was at least two roads that led from Athens that could take supply to the Albanian front - or at least pretty close....

You've also shown the route the Germans took in their charge south through Greece. Again, you've decided that if the Germans could move south along these routes, that must mean the Greeks supplied 1st Army through them - despite what those total bozos in the US Army think.

So effectively because you think you've supplied the could, that means the Greeks did. But you don't know that. The US military seems to believe they didn't. But let's stay with the Greeks could for a minute. Could they? I've told you about the distance between Athens and Albania (as opposed to Salonika and Albania). It's clear - both in distance and terrain - why Salonika would be more likely to be used.

We are talking about the supply of 14 divisions of a Greek Army. That's a lot of supply on a daily basis. Have you confirmed the Greek motor transport situation in 1941? Have you confirmed what rail links there were then? Do you know what amount of transport would be required, and over how many days, to get the same amount of supply to the Albanian front from each source? You see, there are lots of elements to the could. You providing a couple of maps doesn't really wash does it?

Now, how about you stop playing around with silly maps and actually provide some evidence that the Greek 1st Army was supplied from Athens? Until you do, I'll stick with what the US army professionals have concluded. Thanks.


I don't know why you keep clinging to this rot when it's so obvious that you're wrong.

The Greeks were just defending - sitting in their foxholes without moving. The Germans were advancing and on the offensive. Obviously, their supply needs were proportionately far greater. Yet there they are being supplied over those very same roads you claim can't be used for supply. (By the way, here's another example of the Germans supplying themselves over roads at distances of well over 500 km. [:D]).

If the Germans can supply themselves offensively over those roads, how could the Greeks not be able to provide defensive supply over those same roads?!
warspite1

My goodness!!

What is wrong with you. Are you actually trying to be wrong on every point?

quote:

The Greeks were just defending - sitting in their foxholes without moving.


Why don't you stop spouting rubbish that betrays you are totally and utterly out of your depth and try reading some history? Try reading something, anything about the Greco-Italian war and you will understand how thoroughly absurd that comment is.

quote:

The Germans were advancing and on the offensive. Obviously, their supply needs were proportionately far greater.


Oh dear..... Please re-read that and come back when you've realised what a total load of rubbish you've spoken. If you can't then I'll point you in the right direction - but I'm a fair man and so will give you a chance.

quote:

Yet there they are being supplied over those very same roads you claim can't be used for supply. (By the way, here's another example of the Germans supplying themselves over roads at distances of well over 500 km. [:D]).

If the Germans can supply themselves offensively over those roads, how could the Greeks not be able to provide defensive supply over those same roads?!


Do you even understand basic English????? Read my post again. There is a difference between Could and Did. Yes? When you've found out what the Greeks did then you can provide that evidence here. Until then I'll listen to the professionals in the US Army who have given their understand of what the Greeks Did during their study of the Balkan Campaign.


And I never said that they DID supply themselves by those routes. I said they could have.

warspite1

So you've been arguing like a stubborn mule over something you don't understand - but moreover don't even believe - just for the sake of it???? Wow.....

So let's be completely clear. You won't believe the findings of the US Military study on how the Greek supplied their 1st Army via Salonika (a quicker, flater, shorter route), but now (after about 30 pages of nonsense about how they supplied them from Athens) you admit you don't know how the Greeks did actually supply them. But although you don't know that you are still going to insist that the US military planners don't have a clue.......????

Erm...... okay......


Let's see: It's now clear that the Germans supplied themselves (offensively) over those very same roads that you claim the Greeks couldn't have used (defensively) - even though the Greeks have a rail line part of the way, which the Germans don't have.

And, I repeat, you've taken that study out of context.

And, I repeat, here's another example of the Germans being supplied by road for at least 500km. (And probably even further than that, since there's no telling where their rail head was at this time after blitzing through Yugoslavia just to get to Greece.


Belgrade to Thessaloniki with a stop in Skopji.

But the Germans were short of trucks and had difficulties making more.


They seized them from the occupied countries. Which in it self played havoc with spare parts and maintainence.




76mm -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 12:45:18 AM)

I'll chip in another recommendation for Tooze's book. I sort of dreaded reading it--it sounded really heavy--but actually it was very readable, and very eye-opening. The Germans were a mess!




loki100 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 8:31:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

I realise there is next to no sense in responding to you (did you really need to fill up two pages with endless quotes?), but XXXI Pzr Corps and its associated formations was so wrecked by Yugoslavia/Greece it was next in action in November 1941 - it took 6 months to refit at a time when the Germans really needed every armoured formation they had to hand.

by the end of that campaign, they weren't supplied in any meaningful sense, they could just about keep an advance going against totally fragmented opposition.

warspite1

I'm interested to hear more about this. I understand German losses in Yugoslavia and Greece (Crete accepted) were light. Presumably you are talking about mechanical breakdowns and losses of machinery (I hear driving in mountains and up and down hills can be quite taxing [;)] - or so Wagner believed - but then what does he know [8|])?

I am particularly interested in this given the fighting to come in Spain in the Med-first scenario.

Thanks




yes, it was nothing to do with combat losses but all the engines and drive shafts were wrecked by the terrain and roads. So 2 Pzr divisions took no part in the main phase of Barbarossa and the formations were only allocated to the Ost Heer in late October (when they got trashed again in the second phase of Typhoon).

another instance that shows the same problem is the Soviet invasion of Manchuria. The Japanese had no AT guns that could deal with the Soviet armour (either the LL Shermans or the T34s/IS2s), a week into the campaign, the Soviets had pulled half of 6 TA out of the advance as it had basically broken down (the Shermans) and even the more robust Soviet stuff was becoming unreliable.

There is a reason why post war so many armies invested a lot in tank transporters, they found out that poor terrain quickly means you have next to no effective tanks if they have to move under their speed.

So, yep, chuck say 2 Pzr armies into Spain, and given Germany's rate of tank production they would probably have been refitted for combat sometime in late 1942.

of course I do realise this is not what is shown in Prados' old boardgame (Advanced Third Reich)

quote:

ORIGINAL: 76mm

I'll chip in another recommendation for Tooze's book. I sort of dreaded reading it--it sounded really heavy--but actually it was very readable, and very eye-opening. The Germans were a mess!


fully agree, its the sort of book that makes Economic History an interesting subject




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 1:13:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100
yes, it was nothing to do with combat losses but all the engines and drive shafts were wrecked by the terrain and roads. So 2 Pzr divisions took no part in the main phase of Barbarossa and the formations were only allocated to the Ost Heer in late October (when they got trashed again in the second phase of Typhoon).

Was there a particular reference(s) which indicated to you that two of the panzer divisions used in Greece were unavailable due to maintenance needs until Oct '41?

Assuming the two panzer divisions you're referring to are the 2nd and the 5th, they did both arrive back in Germany in June from Greece with too much work to do in too little time to be considered for the opening moves of Barbarossa but both appear to have been ready by August (when 2nd was ordered to France and 5th was (IIRC) preparing for a possible move to the Med). In early Sept though, priorities had changed and both began their move to Russia to participate in operations there.

Askey's "Operation Barbarossa" seems to confirm some of the key dates, so it may be that the divisions spent no more than two months in Germany before they were ready to go and that time included divisional reorganization, re-equipping (ie Pz IIIf's replacing Pz IIIe's and Pz II's, etc) as well as any repair/maintenance/replacements after the Balkans (particularly 2nd Pz that lost much of its vehicle strength when several transports they were onboard were sunk by Brit subs in May).

Just asking because I'm curious about your statement of what appears to be an excessively long period for a division to be down for maintenance, even for Germany.[;)]




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 3:19:19 PM)

It does not really seem that long. It takes at least one week for an armoured company to go through a quarterly maintenance cycle - and that is with more modern vehicles that have had more testing and are more robust. Thirty percent of a panzer division broke down during Anschluss with no combat. Then have it operate in combat with the steep grades and sharp curves, that is even worse on the drive train and suspension.

As far as reequiping with new tanks, those men have to be trained on those new tanks. That could have been done in France as well as other maintenance. Not all of the vehicles may have moved with the unit to France and the unit may have still been drawing equipment.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 3:52:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100

.....of course I do realise this is not what is shown in Prados' old boardgame (Advanced Third Reich)

warspite1

Yes, you've picked the wrong game. If you want a game that simulates WWII so accurately you can base a counterfactual on it without fear of contradiction, you want that game Lemay bases his ideas on.

It's fantastically accurate....

By the by, and just to add more evidence to the fire. In the Greek campaign the atrocious road conditions took an enormous toll on the German trucks - largely as a result of tyres. Vehicle attrition rate was 35% after only two weeks of hostilities.

So this Med-first strategy will be interesting with North Africa, Spain, Greece, Yugoslavia, Turkey, and the Middle East all having to be tamed before Barbarossa. I hope the Germans had lots of spare parts.....




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 3:56:25 PM)

Not to mention rubber. Germany had a shortage of rubber so bad that they had to build more plants to make it. One plant in Poland now make one heck of a lot of rubber . . .




UP844 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 6:32:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

By the by, and just to add more evidence to the fire. In the Greek campaign the atrocious road conditions took an enormous toll on the German trucks - largely as a result of tyres. Vehicle attrition rate was 35% after only two weeks of hostilities.


I just finished reading "The Day of Battle" (no book to write home about), which mentions that 25% of the Allied vehicles in Italy in late 1943 were non-operational.




Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/8/2020 9:12:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Not to mention rubber. Germany had a shortage of rubber so bad that they had to build more plants to make it. One plant in Poland now make one heck of a lot of rubber . . .

So what did they use for prophylactics? [8D]




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 1:02:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Not to mention rubber. Germany had a shortage of rubber so bad that they had to build more plants to make it. One plant in Poland now make one heck of a lot of rubber . . .

So what did they use for prophylactics? [8D]


Maybe they did not bother to use them. After all, they wanted a high German birth rate.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 3:43:39 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UP844

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

By the by, and just to add more evidence to the fire. In the Greek campaign the atrocious road conditions took an enormous toll on the German trucks - largely as a result of tyres. Vehicle attrition rate was 35% after only two weeks of hostilities.


I just finished reading "The Day of Battle" (no book to write home about), which mentions that 25% of the Allied vehicles in Italy in late 1943 were non-operational.
warspite1

Yep, waging war in largely inhospitable terrain will do that [:)] This is yet more evidence that this 'blitz' through Spain, Turkey and the Middle East especially will be expensive for the Germans - even if the cost in battle casualties is relatively light. And unlike the Allies, the Germans don't have the ability to make good such losses - or at least not quickly.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 3:55:00 AM)

The Germans were short of iron ore and coal. The iron ore to make steel and the coal for many things. The low countries, France and Italy all imported coal from the United Kingdom but for some reason, they were cut off when Germany took over their countries and Italy joined the war. I can't understand why . . .

On the other hand, if the Allies needed iron ore and/or steel, the US was ready to assist. I read where in 1941 there were 250 million tons (short or long, it did not state or I don't remember) of steel produced in the world. Minnesota alone shipped out 75 million tons of iron ore but only mined 65 million tons of iron ore that year. Being two thirds iron content, Minnesota alone shipped out enough iron ore to make fifty million tons of steel. That was only one state in the United States, there were other states with iron ore mining.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 9:23:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The Germans were short of iron ore and coal.

warspite1

Interesting. I thought they have enough of both from Sweden (Iron Ore) and France (Both). Was that later in the war?




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 12:19:02 PM)

Once they captured the territories in the West that had previously received coal from Great Britain but for some reason, Great Britain did not send coal to those areas after the Germans occupied them. Germany as importing iron ore from Sweden but it is was not enough to also support the Western occupied territories.

About half the weight of a bomb was steel, according to what I had read before, and then the rest was explosives and such. It also depended upon the quality of the steel as well so weaker steel for the bombs needed more steel and less explosives. The same would also be true for artillery ammunition, although the ratio might be different.

There was also a shortage of the chemicals for the explosives for the artillery shells. In fact, I was reading where the Germans were stockpiling artillery shells with no explosives.

In 1941, there was also a shortage of the 10,5 cm shells on the Eastern Front since production had been decreased.





warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 1:24:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Once they captured the territories in the West that had previously received coal from Great Britain but for some reason, Great Britain did not send coal to those areas after the Germans occupied them. Germany as importing iron ore from Sweden but it is was not enough to also support the Western occupied territories.

warspite1

Well I may be wrong but I read that Alsace-Lorraine was an important provider too.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 1:38:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Once they captured the territories in the West that had previously received coal from Great Britain but for some reason, Great Britain did not send coal to those areas after the Germans occupied them. Germany as importing iron ore from Sweden but it is was not enough to also support the Western occupied territories.

warspite1

Well I may be wrong but I read that Alsace-Lorraine was an important provider too.



Yes, but it was not enough.




Aurelian -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 3:10:41 PM)

https://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?t=208676 Coal production




Curtis Lemay -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 9:02:53 PM)

Ok, this has gone on long enough. Time for a summary:

The Hypothesis:

Shortly after the start of the war in 1939, German planners realize that, without naval parity, without amphibious transport, and without a strategic air force, a cross-channel invasion is a fool’s errand. They need another way to get at the British, and Egypt could serve that purpose. This fits well with Hitler the Anglophile.

They also realize that, if Italy joins the war (which they realize is very likely), the Mediterranean will become a significant theater of the war. That theater will be hard to master if the path must go over that sea. They will need a land route to both Gibraltar and Suez. That means they must get there via Spain and Turkey.

Finally, they realize that Middle Eastern oil will be a boon to their cause, and they can best get to it via Turkey. This also will put them closer to the huge Russian oil complex at Baku. Capture of that complex will cripple the Soviets.

They decide that, after Poland and France are out of the way, Spain (provided Italy joins the war), then Turkey must be addressed next. Therefore, they urge that negotiations with Franco to join the Axis begin ASAP.

The Axis Med Strategy is born!

This is the premise for the hypothetical, and it is a reasonable premise. All of the above could have happened.

France and Spain:

The Allies having no knowledge of the German Med Strategy, the war proceeds as it did historically, with Poland, Denmark, and Norway tumbling out as per history. The Soviet Union cheers both sides on as it stays neutral.

As planning progresses for France, planning for Spain does so in a parallel fashion. Taking a page from the Japanese negotiations with the US, a deadline is set beyond which war with Spain will become certain. That deadline is set at the minute their forces are ready to kick off at the Spanish border.

No change in circumstances means that France tumbles out as it did historically and Italy joins the war on the Axis side. However, knowing that they may have to invade Spain, the Germans, in their Vichy negotiations, push for a wider gap at the Spanish border, in exchange for equal territory elsewhere.

After the six weeks of combat in France, the freshest German divisions are earmarked for Spain. A handful arrive by rail on the Spanish border sometime in July – much as they did historically. Franco, never having any intention of joining the Axis, still is holding out at that point. That’s the tripwire! Those few German divisions are given the greenlight to invade and they catch the Spanish in their peacetime deployments. They quickly overrun the thin border guard and spread out into Spain. They are followed by the rest of a full army group: Let’s say, 25 Infantry, 2 Motor, and 3 Panzer divisions in total. (According to SPI, that totals 196 strength vs. 21 for the Spanish: over 9:1 theater edge – local edges will far exceed that).

Repair commences immediately on the Spanish rail lines. But the divisions carry plenty of supply with them, and trucks can easily bridge the gap to them from the rail head in France – as they did in North Africa and in the Balkans – even if this means having to wait for supplies to build up a bit before continuing. Their supply requirements are directly proportional to the size and quality of the Spanish army they’re fighting: tiny and low. The rail line in France, operating to the European rail standard, can deliver enough supply for an entire army group to its rail head at the Spanish border (as similar lines in North Korea did for the Chinese later).

The Spanish army is smaller than the BEF was in France (which was only about 10% of the force the Germans beat in that campaign). The last time the Spanish faced a foreign enemy was in the Spanish-American War, where they got rolled everywhere. Most of their best equipment was from the Italians and Germans – good luck getting any replacements from them!

In a few weeks, Madrid falls. Spanish resistance starts to falter. Franco begins to come to grips with his situation: He’s a fascist dictator. Soon he will have to flee Spain or fall into Hitler’s hands. Once in the hands of the British, he will never be allowed to make any deal with the Axis. But he knows he will never be returned to power by the liberal democracies that would have to re-conquer Spain. His only option is to make a deal with Hitler. Via his agents, he proposes a “Vichy” Spain: An enclave in Spain that the Germans will stay out of. Hitler, never even wanting Spain to begin with, and now wanting it pacified, agrees. In fact, provided that the Germans will be allowed to repair and use the rail line from the French border to Gibraltar, that enclave can be all of Spain!! Franco gets what he wants (return to power in Spain), and Hitler gets what he wants (Gibraltar). Knowing for some time that this would be his safety valve, Franco never allows the British the right to occupy the Canaries or Spanish Morocco. Once the “Vichy” deal is in place, British occupation of either would violate Vichy Spain’s neutrality – making them full Axis belligerents.

Of course, if this doesn’t come to pass, Mussolini is well aware of the importance of Gibraltar to Italy’s safety. He would be proud to tackle garrisoning Spain to protect Gibraltar. He would also be rewarded the right to loot Spain.

Repair of the Spanish rail network continues regardless.

Gibraltar is a tougher nut to crack, but, given the air power that the Germans can bring to bear, it can be practically isolated from resupply. The assaulting ground forces required are small by necessity: the available frontage is tiny! The rest of the invasion force can now be sent to the East. There is significant cost, but Gibraltar eventually falls. Allied access to the Western Mediterranean is now blocked. Now all the Axis need is Suez and the Med is an Axis lake.

North Africa:

Mussolini has been brought into the German plans for the Med, since he may be needed to garrison Spain. Able to be enticed by German plans – as his participation in Barbarossa would later show - once informed of German plans to take Suez via Turkey, the Germans can convince him that a risky strike for the Pyramids from Libya is not a necessary (or even a good) idea. Furthermore, they can convince him that it’s in the Axis interest to sucker the British into a trap deep in Libya as Suez falls. He pulls his forces back deep into Libya to set the trap. This proceeds long before the British are ready for O’Connor’s Raid. The Italians slip out of their positions in Egypt in the night and are well on their way to safety. Continuous good use of land mines make pursuit by the British difficult, even though they are better motorized. Most likely, the Italians escape to better positions deep in Libya. But, if they don’t, they’re no worse off than they were historically. Rommel soon arrives, and the situation is secure. How deep do the British end up in Libya? Probably about as deep as historically. Possibly deeper.

Meanwhile, the British pursue the historical actions in Greece and Syria (same historical circumstances), with the historical results. They are thrown out of Greece and Crete, and Vichy Syria disappears.

When Turkey kicks off soon after, Rommel will be in good position to shred their positions in Libya and press them too hard to escape Libya as German forces bear down from Turkey.

Now, Spain, Gibraltar and Suez are connected to Germany’s central rail net. They need only position token forces in the area, assured that overwhelming force can be delivered by rail as soon as any one of them is threatened.

Turkey:

After Yugoslavia and Greece, a German army group is now on the Turkish border. The Turks, having fought for centuries to hold on to their European holdings, can’t bear to part with them and have much of their force on the European side of the Straits (confirmed by SPI). They garrison the Bosporus and the Dardanelles, but don’t expect the Sea of Marmara to be vulnerable. And they don’t really expect any invasion by the Germans anyway. Old Allies from the First World War, they figure the Germans will want to wait till they are ready to join voluntarily.

But the Germans, having nearly a year to plan the invasion, have secured river barges that can fit on rail cars and built trailers for them. They blitz to the European side of the Sea of Marmara. They then cross it via those barges to the Asian side (with the Luftwaffe assuring no Turkish air or naval interference). Perhaps some paratroops are used to make absolutely sure that crossing is a success. Once established, they rush divisions across, which spread out to isolate the defenses of the Dardanelles and the Bosporus. Everything on the European side of the Straits is now pocketed. They, being of poor quality, quickly wither. The huge force facing them soon overwhelms them. The Germans are now fully over the Straits and into Asiatic Turkey proper. The Turkish rail, same standard as most of Europe, is easy to repair.

The Turkish army, while about four times the size of the Spanish, is of no better quality: The Turks have spent the last 50 years surrendering their entire empire and the Turkish division that was sent to Korea, later, was a joke of a division. SPI depicts most of them as static. Having lost a large fraction of their force at the Straits, they are incapable of mounting a serious defense of the interior of Turkey, due to the huge breadth of the defense lines needed.

While this is going on, Stalin is getting very nervous. He complains to Hitler. Perhaps he even makes noises about declaring war. Hitler mollifies him with another of his coups! He proposes that they split Turkey just like they did Poland! Adolf assures Joe that he is only invading Turkey to get to Suez. So, Russia can have everything east of Sivas. Stalin, never intending to go to war with the Germans while they appear so powerful, thinks he’s the one that has pulled off the coup! He’s gained territory in Turkey and Baku is now about 1400km from the Germans, instead of the 700km it would have been had he not acted. (Of course, it is still far less than the 2900km it was historically 😊).

With Soviet help, Turkey is quickly subdued (though the Germans have a full year to achieve that if necessary). Leaving an Italian garrison (perhaps augmented by Armenians and Kurds). And a small force on the (new) Soviet border, a huge force now barrels towards Suez. Trapped between the Africa Corps and this huge force, the British 8th Army can, at best, hope to escape to flee out of the Med; at worst, to be trapped and destroyed. Once Suez is captured, the work begins to ruin the canal. The RN, at best, fled before Suez was even in danger. At worst, they are now trapped in the Axis lake, where they are doomed. The RM can now deliver supplies to Suez or further into Syria via Athens to Damascus – bypassing Turkish rail lines.

Malta never even becomes an issue, and withers without supply till it surrenders.

Japan:

Barbarossa having not happened in 1941, the Japanese are very nervous about the Soviets (who trounced them at Nomonhan earlier) staring down their throats at them from Siberia. They don’t have the confidence to launch the invasion of French Indochina or the Rising Sun offensive. They sit on their hands and wait. No Pearl Harbor means no US in the war in 1941.

Even if this doesn’t happen, and the Japanese go ahead, Hitler, upon hearing of Pearl Harbor, decides NOT to declare war on the US since he hasn’t gotten to the Gates of Moscow at that time, and isn’t quite as cocksure as he was at that point historically. The US still doesn’t end up at war with Germany for another year.

Russia:

Finally, in the summer of 1942, Barbarossa kicks off. But, this time, there is no war in North Africa. Rommel and his Africa Corps (plus quite a bit more from the Turkish operations) are actually in Turkey, heading for Baku (where he ultimately earns the sobriquet of “The Caucasus Fox”).

Russia, having maintained a peacetime production schedule, is not much more powerful than they were at the summer of 1941. And they haven’t yet learned any lessons about the poor state of their forces. The Germans, meanwhile, have continued wartime production after a light year of combat. They’re even stronger than they had been in 1941. Plus, their offensive options are much greater, with the frontage in Turkey added to the Soviet defense needs, thinning those defenses out. The year of extra planning helps as well. Barbarossa proceeds even better than it did historically. Once Baku falls (and it will, along with plenty of other oil centers in the Caucasus), the Soviets are heavily impacted by the loss of oil and Germany is ultimately benefited by the addition of oil. The tipping point is reached and Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, and Baku fall before the first-year ends. Russia is now fatally compromised. 1943 is just a mopping up operation as the front reaches the Urals.

US:

By the time the US can field forces in Europe in 1944, much of the German army is back from Russia and it’s too late. The US must devote huge resources to much greater than historical ground forces to partly replace the, now missing, Russians. This will sink a lot of Naval Task Forces before they are even made: Japan will be able to hold out in the Pacific – even remain a threat to Hawaii and the West Coast. While the US develops the Atom Bomb, the Germans continue to develop Sarin. Germany gets back to work on a very serious navy and air force. If the bomb is used (tough to do with the skies filled with Me-262’s), London gets Sarin (or New York gets it, if German rocket development is at that point). World War II morphs into a Cold War.




RFalvo69 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 9:30:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: UP844

I just finished reading "The Day of Battle" (no book to write home about)

I was so insensate to buy the whole "Liberation" trilogy in a single sweep. They came highly recommended. "An Army at YAWN" made me reconsider the affair: in some parts I wasn't actually able to understand what was going on, while other events (like the crucial part the Italian Army, and specifically the "Centauro" armored division, played at Kasserine) were skipped over.

I then started "Day of the Battle". When one-third in (well, it felt like one-third) they were still debating what to do after Tunisia I folded. [>:]




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 10:04:55 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

Ok, this has gone on long enough. Time for a summary:

The Hypothesis:

Shortly after the start of the war in 1939, German planners realize that, without naval parity, without amphibious transport, and without a strategic air force, a cross-channel invasion is a fool’s errand. They need another way to get at the British, and Egypt could serve that purpose. This fits well with Hitler the Anglophile.

They also realize that, if Italy joins the war (which they realize is very likely), the Mediterranean will become a significant theater of the war. That theater will be hard to master if the path must go over that sea. They will need a land route to both Gibraltar and Suez. That means they must get there via Spain and Turkey.

Finally, they realize that Middle Eastern oil will be a boon to their cause, and they can best get to it via Turkey. This also will put them closer to the huge Russian oil complex at Baku. Capture of that complex will cripple the Soviets.

They decide that, after Poland and France are out of the way, Spain (provided Italy joins the war), then Turkey must be addressed next. Therefore, they urge that negotiations with Franco to join the Axis begin ASAP.

The Axis Med Strategy is born!

This is the premise for the hypothetical, and it is a reasonable premise. All of the above could have happened.

France and Spain:

The Allies having no knowledge of the German Med Strategy, the war proceeds as it did historically, with Poland, Denmark, and Norway tumbling out as per history. The Soviet Union cheers both sides on as it stays neutral.

As planning progresses for France, planning for Spain does so in a parallel fashion. Taking a page from the Japanese negotiations with the US, a deadline is set beyond which war with Spain will become certain. That deadline is set at the minute their forces are ready to kick off at the Spanish border.

No change in circumstances means that France tumbles out as it did historically and Italy joins the war on the Axis side. However, knowing that they may have to invade Spain, the Germans, in their Vichy negotiations, push for a wider gap at the Spanish border, in exchange for equal territory elsewhere.

After the six weeks of combat in France, the freshest German divisions are earmarked for Spain. A handful arrive by rail on the Spanish border sometime in July – much as they did historically. Franco, never having any intention of joining the Axis, still is holding out at that point. That’s the tripwire! Those few German divisions are given the greenlight to invade and they catch the Spanish in their peacetime deployments. They quickly overrun the thin border guard and spread out into Spain. They are followed by the rest of a full army group: Let’s say, 25 Infantry, 2 Motor, and 3 Panzer divisions in total. (According to SPI, that totals 196 strength vs. 21 for the Spanish: over 9:1 theater edge – local edges will far exceed that).

Repair commences immediately on the Spanish rail lines. But the divisions carry plenty of supply with them, and trucks can easily bridge the gap to them from the rail head in France – as they did in North Africa and in the Balkans – even if this means having to wait for supplies to build up a bit before continuing. Their supply requirements are directly proportional to the size and quality of the Spanish army they’re fighting: tiny and low. The rail line in France, operating to the European rail standard, can deliver enough supply for an entire army group to its rail head at the Spanish border (as similar lines in North Korea did for the Chinese later).

The Spanish army is smaller than the BEF was in France (which was only about 10% of the force the Germans beat in that campaign). The last time the Spanish faced a foreign enemy was in the Spanish-American War, where they got rolled everywhere. Most of their best equipment was from the Italians and Germans – good luck getting any replacements from them!

In a few weeks, Madrid falls. Spanish resistance starts to falter. Franco begins to come to grips with his situation: He’s a fascist dictator. Soon he will have to flee Spain or fall into Hitler’s hands. Once in the hands of the British, he will never be allowed to make any deal with the Axis. But he knows he will never be returned to power by the liberal democracies that would have to re-conquer Spain. His only option is to make a deal with Hitler. Via his agents, he proposes a “Vichy” Spain: An enclave in Spain that the Germans will stay out of. Hitler, never even wanting Spain to begin with, and now wanting it pacified, agrees. In fact, provided that the Germans will be allowed to repair and use the rail line from the French border to Gibraltar, that enclave can be all of Spain!! Franco gets what he wants (return to power in Spain), and Hitler gets what he wants (Gibraltar). Knowing for some time that this would be his safety valve, Franco never allows the British the right to occupy the Canaries or Spanish Morocco. Once the “Vichy” deal is in place, British occupation of either would violate Vichy Spain’s neutrality – making them full Axis belligerents.

Of course, if this doesn’t come to pass, Mussolini is well aware of the importance of Gibraltar to Italy’s safety. He would be proud to tackle garrisoning Spain to protect Gibraltar. He would also be rewarded the right to loot Spain.

Repair of the Spanish rail network continues regardless.

Gibraltar is a tougher nut to crack, but, given the air power that the Germans can bring to bear, it can be practically isolated from resupply. The assaulting ground forces required are small by necessity: the available frontage is tiny! The rest of the invasion force can now be sent to the East. There is significant cost, but Gibraltar eventually falls. Allied access to the Western Mediterranean is now blocked. Now all the Axis need is Suez and the Med is an Axis lake.

North Africa:

Mussolini has been brought into the German plans for the Med, since he may be needed to garrison Spain. Able to be enticed by German plans – as his participation in Barbarossa would later show - once informed of German plans to take Suez via Turkey, the Germans can convince him that a risky strike for the Pyramids from Libya is not a necessary (or even a good) idea. Furthermore, they can convince him that it’s in the Axis interest to sucker the British into a trap deep in Libya as Suez falls. He pulls his forces back deep into Libya to set the trap. This proceeds long before the British are ready for O’Connor’s Raid. The Italians slip out of their positions in Egypt in the night and are well on their way to safety. Continuous good use of land mines make pursuit by the British difficult, even though they are better motorized. Most likely, the Italians escape to better positions deep in Libya. But, if they don’t, they’re no worse off than they were historically. Rommel soon arrives, and the situation is secure. How deep do the British end up in Libya? Probably about as deep as historically. Possibly deeper.

Meanwhile, the British pursue the historical actions in Greece and Syria (same historical circumstances), with the historical results. They are thrown out of Greece and Crete, and Vichy Syria disappears.

When Turkey kicks off soon after, Rommel will be in good position to shred their positions in Libya and press them too hard to escape Libya as German forces bear down from Turkey.

Now, Spain, Gibraltar and Suez are connected to Germany’s central rail net. They need only position token forces in the area, assured that overwhelming force can be delivered by rail as soon as any one of them is threatened.

Turkey:

After Yugoslavia and Greece, a German army group is now on the Turkish border. The Turks, having fought for centuries to hold on to their European holdings, can’t bear to part with them and have much of their force on the European side of the Straits (confirmed by SPI). They garrison the Bosporus and the Dardanelles, but don’t expect the Sea of Marmara to be vulnerable. And they don’t really expect any invasion by the Germans anyway. Old Allies from the First World War, they figure the Germans will want to wait till they are ready to join voluntarily.

But the Germans, having nearly a year to plan the invasion, have secured river barges that can fit on rail cars and built trailers for them. They blitz to the European side of the Sea of Marmara. They then cross it via those barges to the Asian side (with the Luftwaffe assuring no Turkish air or naval interference). Perhaps some paratroops are used to make absolutely sure that crossing is a success. Once established, they rush divisions across, which spread out to isolate the defenses of the Dardanelles and the Bosporus. Everything on the European side of the Straits is now pocketed. They, being of poor quality, quickly wither. The huge force facing them soon overwhelms them. The Germans are now fully over the Straits and into Asiatic Turkey proper. The Turkish rail, same standard as most of Europe, is easy to repair.

The Turkish army, while about four times the size of the Spanish, is of no better quality: The Turks have spent the last 50 years surrendering their entire empire and the Turkish division that was sent to Korea, later, was a joke of a division. SPI depicts most of them as static. Having lost a large fraction of their force at the Straits, they are incapable of mounting a serious defense of the interior of Turkey, due to the huge breadth of the defense lines needed.

While this is going on, Stalin is getting very nervous. He complains to Hitler. Perhaps he even makes noises about declaring war. Hitler mollifies him with another of his coups! He proposes that they split Turkey just like they did Poland! Adolf assures Joe that he is only invading Turkey to get to Suez. So, Russia can have everything east of Sivas. Stalin, never intending to go to war with the Germans while they appear so powerful, thinks he’s the one that has pulled off the coup! He’s gained territory in Turkey and Baku is now about 1400km from the Germans, instead of the 700km it would have been had he not acted. (Of course, it is still far less than the 2900km it was historically 😊).

With Soviet help, Turkey is quickly subdued (though the Germans have a full year to achieve that if necessary). Leaving an Italian garrison (perhaps augmented by Armenians and Kurds). And a small force on the (new) Soviet border, a huge force now barrels towards Suez. Trapped between the Africa Corps and this huge force, the British 8th Army can, at best, hope to escape to flee out of the Med; at worst, to be trapped and destroyed. Once Suez is captured, the work begins to ruin the canal. The RN, at best, fled before Suez was even in danger. At worst, they are now trapped in the Axis lake, where they are doomed. The RM can now deliver supplies to Suez or further into Syria via Athens to Damascus – bypassing Turkish rail lines.

Malta never even becomes an issue, and withers without supply till it surrenders.

Japan:

Barbarossa having not happened in 1941, the Japanese are very nervous about the Soviets (who trounced them at Nomonhan earlier) staring down their throats at them from Siberia. They don’t have the confidence to launch the invasion of French Indochina or the Rising Sun offensive. They sit on their hands and wait. No Pearl Harbor means no US in the war in 1941.

Even if this doesn’t happen, and the Japanese go ahead, Hitler, upon hearing of Pearl Harbor, decides NOT to declare war on the US since he hasn’t gotten to the Gates of Moscow at that time, and isn’t quite as cocksure as he was at that point historically. The US still doesn’t end up at war with Germany for another year.

Russia:

Finally, in the summer of 1942, Barbarossa kicks off. But, this time, there is no war in North Africa. Rommel and his Africa Corps (plus quite a bit more from the Turkish operations) are actually in Turkey, heading for Baku (where he ultimately earns the sobriquet of “The Caucasus Fox”).

Russia, having maintained a peacetime production schedule, is not much more powerful than they were at the summer of 1941. And they haven’t yet learned any lessons about the poor state of their forces. The Germans, meanwhile, have continued wartime production after a light year of combat. They’re even stronger than they had been in 1941. Plus, their offensive options are much greater, with the frontage in Turkey added to the Soviet defense needs, thinning those defenses out. The year of extra planning helps as well. Barbarossa proceeds even better than it did historically. Once Baku falls (and it will, along with plenty of other oil centers in the Caucasus), the Soviets are heavily impacted by the loss of oil and Germany is ultimately benefited by the addition of oil. The tipping point is reached and Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, and Baku fall before the first-year ends. Russia is now fatally compromised. 1943 is just a mopping up operation as the front reaches the Urals.

US:

By the time the US can field forces in Europe in 1944, much of the German army is back from Russia and it’s too late. The US must devote huge resources to much greater than historical ground forces to partly replace the, now missing, Russians. This will sink a lot of Naval Task Forces before they are even made: Japan will be able to hold out in the Pacific – even remain a threat to Hawaii and the West Coast. While the US develops the Atom Bomb, the Germans continue to develop Sarin. Germany gets back to work on a very serious navy and air force. If the bomb is used (tough to do with the skies filled with Me-262’s), London gets Sarin (or New York gets it, if German rocket development is at that point). World War II morphs into a Cold War.


BTW. have you checked your pharmaceutical supply lately? Have any adjustments made?




UP844 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/9/2020 10:39:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: RFalvo69

I was so insensate to buy the whole "Liberation" trilogy in a single sweep.



Me too [:(].




76mm -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 1:58:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay
Russia, having maintained a peacetime production schedule, is not much more powerful than they were at the summer of 1941. And they haven’t yet learned any lessons about the poor state of their forces.

But of course, this is completely incorrect, borderline fantastical. Russia was in the midst of a major re-armament and mobilization drive. In addition, after the Winter War they realized that their army's training was woefully deficient and put a major emphasis on training to rectify as many problems as they could. In fact, Hitler invaded Russia in 1941 because he feared that it would be a much more fearsome opponent if he waited.

I could provide numerous facts, figures, and citations to back these facts, but won't bother because you would completely ignore them, as usual.




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 5:07:53 AM)

Be warned Lemay. The USGS has just reported the distant rumbling of a 10,000 word rebuttal being typed somewhere across the Atlantic.




loki100 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 7:39:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Curtis Lemay

...

This is the premise for the hypothetical, and it is a reasonable premise. All of the above could have happened.

...


yep, Hitler would have been so much more effective if he'd put in the requisite hundred's of hours into playing World in Flames as opposed to being a product of his own ideology and the world view of the militaristic strand in 19C German thinking




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 7:52:32 AM)

Well a couple of things. Firstly thank-you for at last putting some effort into your “Staff Study”. At least that now makes more clear your thinking, it’s just a shame that it got to more than 40 pages and over 1,300 posts. But that is by the by, and I appreciate you’ve now done this.

As I said previously, I probably would never have got involved in the discussion had I not mis-understood that you were proposing Germany adopted this strategy in 1939. But having got involved in it I am too invested to walk away. So I comment as follows (at least as far as Spain is concerned as that’s what kicks it off):

Ok, this has gone on long enough. Time for a summary:

The Hypothesis:

Shortly after the start of the war in 1939, German planners realize that, without naval parity, without amphibious transport, and without a strategic air force, a cross-channel invasion is a fool’s errand. They need another way to get at the British, and Egypt could serve that purpose. This fits well with Hitler the Anglophile. [You said shortly after the start? So I assume you mean after the defeat of Poland, although regardless of exactly when, I still don’t see this as being a ‘realistic’ German view of the situation in 1939:

a) We have to remove hindsight. I can’t see how you can make a case for the Germans even thinking about what happens post France. France is not going to be a quick win, and indeed historically (and this is born out in the Hitler Directives) the limit of German thinking was to gain enough territory in the Low Countries and North Eastern France to enable then to take the war to Britain by air. Defeating France – let alone defeating France quickly – was not really thought about at this time.

b) But even if you can get around that massive hurdle, there is still the fact that Mussolini has refused to join the war (like Franco, Il Duce gave a large list of items that Germany would need to provide to enable the Italians to get involved) and Germany could not afford this. So there is no need for any thought about the Mediterranean from the German side.

c) And in addition to there being no Mediterranean Front, there is also the fact that Hitler continually believed that the British wouldn’t fight and that they would: i) not go to war over Poland, ii) they would make peace after Poland (we also know this wishful but dominant mind set was held by Hitler after the defeat of France). So we have a situation where Hitler can’t, realistically see past France, but let’s be real here – if Hitler was suddenly presented with a snapshot vision of the future that told him France would be defeated before the end of June 1940 and the British Army would be evicted, at cost, from Norway and France, then that would simply reinforce his belief that Britain would have surrendered.].

They also realize that, if Italy joins the war (which they realize is very likely), the Mediterranean will become a significant theater of the war. That theater will be hard to master if the path must go over that sea. They will need a land route to both Gibraltar and Suez. That means they must get there via Spain and Turkey. [As said, I don’t think they believe Italy entering the war is likely. Yes, a possibility, but not likely. Afterall Mussolini’s bellicose talk, when it came down to it, he backed away from fulfilling the Pact of Steel.]

Finally, they realize that Middle Eastern oil will be a boon to their cause, and they can best get to it via Turkey. This also will put them closer to the huge Russian oil complex at Baku. Capture of that complex will cripple the Soviets. [Again you have the Germans thinking about Turkey in September 1939. What lies between Germany and Turkey at this point? Romania provided 94% of Germany’s oil and was the sole, regular, supplier of oil (yes, even including the NS Pact). Germany ultimately got Romania (and Hungary) to join the tripartite pact in late November 1940 (Bulgaria not until March 1941). What sort of plans would Germany be making for Turkey in September 1939? With Romanian oil at stake do you think that Romania (at this stage still probably more British/French friendly) would be yet another on your growing list of German military conquests? No Romanian oil, no war. Given the circumstances it is inconceivable that Turkey is even on Hitler’s radar].

They decide that, after Poland and France are out of the way, Spain (provided Italy joins the war), then Turkey must be addressed next. Therefore, they urge that negotiations with Franco to join the Axis begin ASAP. [Sorry, but I believe this is too glib a comment. If France are defeated then surely, all logic says Britain will follow. But even if not, for the reasons mentioned above, I just can’t see how Hitler has any focus on Spain right now – and remember it’s been just five months since the end of the Spanish Civil War. What state does Hitler believe Spain to be in?].

The Axis Med Strategy is born!

This is the premise for the hypothetical, and it is a reasonable premise. All of the above could have happened. [I just can’t see it as a reasonable counterfactual and to my mind you have presented no plausible case for Hitler ordering his planning staff to even think about Spain at this stage, let alone Turkey.]


France and Spain:

[The problem of course now is that, without a case being made, the whole timetable falls apart. And nothing happens in the subsequent months to alter that. As 1939 moves into 1940 Hitler’s mind is dominated by one thing – the defeat of the hated French. But Hitler has other irritants to juggle too. On the political front the Balkans is a cause for concern and he needs to keep those fractious children quiet – not least to guarantee his only real source of oil. Then, on the military front the British start causing trouble on his northern flank and Hitler has to think about a pre-emptive invasion of Norway. So he has enough real life worries without thinking about long-range what-if’s.

And still, Mussolini has provided no real indication that he is any nearer entering the war (though he continues to talk a lot and blows in every direction depending upon who he spoke to last). So as Germany counts down to Case Yellow, there remains no change to Hitler’s thinking on a front that doesn’t even exist.]


The Allies having no knowledge of the German Med Strategy, the war proceeds as it did historically, with Poland, Denmark, and Norway tumbling out as per history. The Soviet Union cheers both sides on as it stays neutral.

As planning progresses for France, planning for Spain does so in a parallel fashion. Taking a page from the Japanese negotiations with the US, a deadline is set beyond which war with Spain will become certain. That deadline is set at the minute their forces are ready to kick off at the Spanish border. [As I see it, the problem here is that there is absolutely no thought given over to treating historical characters as anything more than one-dimensional cardboard counters that can directed here there and everywhere. If we ignore previous commentary and go along with your timetable (which for the avoidance of doubt I can’t agree is remotely likely), then we need to explore just what is actually happening and why? So you’ve decided that Hitler decides he wants Gibraltar – and for Gibraltar he needs the help of Spain. But what is it that moves Hitler to want Gibraltar so much he is willing to destroy Franco – the man he helped to install to power - and invade Spain? This is a big decision, and Mussolini will not be happy about it at all.

Mussolini invested far more than Hitler in Spain, and reached an understanding with Franco on Italy’s dominant position in the region. Unless Franco acquiesces to Hitler’s request (and ultimately demand) then he isn’t going to survive (unless he whisks himself off to the Canaries to continue the fight). Either way a pro-German puppet will be installed in Madrid. This is bad news for Italy. This is real life and Italy isn’t Germany, it’s not an extension or a satellite or a client state of Germany. You don’t give enough thought to this in my opinion.]

No change in circumstances means that France tumbles out as it did historically and Italy joins the war on the Axis side. However, knowing that they may have to invade Spain, the Germans, in their Vichy negotiations, push for a wider gap at the Spanish border, in exchange for equal territory elsewhere. [So how is it decided that, having ejected the British from the continent, the mainland is then simply left to recover? You’ve made no mention of this massively important element in terms of what Germany does next. That Germany simply leaves Britain alone doesn’t seem believable. Spain will be another German Army victory. Goering wants, Goering needs, his Luftwaffe to gain their place in the sun. But once again you have Goering passive at this point. His air force failed to stop the British Army getting away from Dunkirk so he’s more than a bit embarrassed, but he also believes Fighter Command is on its last legs and can be defeated in weeks. But you believe he never makes the case to Hitler that he can bring Britain to heel without any need for an invasion? And Hitler, not wanting to invade, and so happy to believe Goering, isn’t going to go with this? Instead we are to believe that, as a first choice, Hitler will invade Spain to get to Gibraltar while leaving his enemy entirely alone (bar the handful of u-boats that are achieving very limited success)?

After the six weeks of combat in France, the freshest German divisions are earmarked for Spain. A handful arrive by rail on the Spanish border sometime in July – much as they did historically. Franco, never having any intention of joining the Axis, still is holding out at that point. That’s the tripwire! Those few German divisions are given the greenlight to invade and they catch the Spanish in their peacetime deployments. They quickly overrun the thin border guard and spread out into Spain. They are followed by the rest of a full army group: Let’s say, 25 Infantry, 2 Motor, and 3 Panzer divisions in total. (According to SPI, that totals 196 strength vs. 21 for the Spanish: over 9:1 theater edge – local edges will far exceed that). [Simply no comment on SPI unit values. If the Germans have been negotiating with the Spanish – and those negotiations have been as intense as real life then, also as per real life, Franco will take the pre-caution of beefing up (as much as he’s able) the defences in the mountain passes just in case.]

Repair commences immediately on the Spanish rail lines. But the divisions carry plenty of supply with them, and trucks can easily bridge the gap to them from the rail head in France – as they did in North Africa and in the Balkans – even if this means having to wait for supplies to build up a bit before continuing. Their supply requirements are directly proportional to the size and quality of the Spanish army they’re fighting: tiny and low. The rail line in France, operating to the European rail standard, can deliver enough supply for an entire army group to its rail head at the Spanish border (as similar lines in North Korea did for the Chinese later).

The Spanish army is smaller than the BEF was in France (which was only about 10% of the force the Germans beat in that campaign). The last time the Spanish faced a foreign enemy was in the Spanish-American War, where they got rolled everywhere. Most of their best equipment was from the Italians and Germans – good luck getting any replacements from them! [Well the last time the Soviets faced a foreign enemy they were thoroughly humiliated in Finland so……..]

But we know the Germans will win. Based on what the German planners themselves have said, the campaign will take some time to finish – how long? Who knows but clearly not less than six weeks (which was the German timescale for Felix!) and therefore could be some months. This will depend on how the Spanish fight and the level of resistance they are prepared to put up given the enormity of the betrayal.

In a few weeks, Madrid falls. Spanish resistance starts to falter. Franco begins to come to grips with his situation: He’s a fascist dictator. Soon he will have to flee Spain or fall into Hitler’s hands. Once in the hands of the British, he will never be allowed to make any deal with the Axis. [Franco has been asked to join the war and has given perfectly reasonable and understandable reasons for not doing so. His country has only recently been involved in a costly and massively destructive civil war. The country has no oil (and is being kept on monthly supplies by the US) and is on the brink of starvation (but being helped by the US). Despite this, Spain has been invaded, without even so much as a declaration of war, by someone he thought a friend. Do you not understand how Franco and the Spanish people would be feeling?

So you know how the US felt about Pearl Harbor – Sunday morning just before Christmas, and by a country that couldn’t even be considered a friend? Well try, applying that to Spain and the Spanish people. And yet you state:
“Once in the hands of the British, he will never be allowed to make any deal with the Axis”. On what basis would Franco possibly be looking to make a deal with Hitler? I mean seriously? It just beggars belief. Hitler and the Germans have just stabbed him in the back, they’ve brought the horrors of war to the Spanish people not much more than a year after the civil war, and you have Franco desperate to make a deal with the man responsible?

But he knows he will never be returned to power by the liberal democracies that would have to re-conquer Spain. [Why? He’s refused to bend to Hitler’s request. He has stood up to Hitler. That makes him an ally of Britain. Churchill (with Roosevelt in the background) will treat with anyone, give assistance to anyone, give financial and military support to anyone that fights Hitler. Franco not only has no reason to think the British will sideline him, but even if he did, the British (and Americans in the background) will be making damn sure he knows the score].

His only option is to make a deal with Hitler. [No. But this is only one side of the story. If Spain and Franco feel betrayed and vengeful, imagine what Hitler feels? He never wanted this, he never wanted to be put in this position. You think he’s going to forgive Franco? As said, I just don’t think you give enough consideration to the fact that these historical figures were actually real people and not cardboard pieces. Hitler, from all we know about him, and having been re-buffed by the ungrateful buffoon, will not allow Franco to live]. Via his agents, he proposes a “Vichy” Spain: An enclave in Spain that the Germans will stay out of. Hitler, never even wanting Spain to begin with, and now wanting it pacified, agrees [Except there is a potentially massive problem here. Given the circumstances, and with the greatest respect, I really don’t think the average Spaniard actually gives a flying one what Hitler ‘agrees’. You see you’ve taken the situation in France, haven’t really understood it, and just decided that will do for Spain, but the circumstances are significantly different….]. In fact, provided that the Germans will be allowed to repair and use the rail line from the French border to Gibraltar, that enclave can be all of Spain!! [So in other words, so long as the German military get unrestricted and on demand use of the Spanish rail network, so long as Germany can conduct war from Spanish soil against Gibraltar (with all that means in return) then Spain can have its country back? But then it’s not really a Spanish ‘enclave’ is it? It’s a Spanish ‘enclave’ that the Germans can essentially do whatever they want to do with….And that doesn’t make it a neutral and the US aren’t going to be providing food and oil to this state.] Franco gets what he wants (return to power in Spain) [So what do you know about Franco that allows you to claim he is a man of so little honour that he would do anything to save his own skin?], and Hitler gets what he wants (Gibraltar). Knowing for some time that this would be his safety valve, Franco never allows the British the right to occupy the Canaries or Spanish Morocco. [But the British had plans drawn up to grab the Canaries in such a scenario – they are not going to wait.] Once the “Vichy” deal is in place, British occupation of either would violate Vichy Spain’s neutrality – making them full Axis belligerents [No it wouldn't. The British are already in situ. They won't give a stuff what dumb 'Vichy' agreement between Spain and Germany it upsets. But you think any violation would automatically make Spain a full on Axis member? You appear to have ignored when the British invaded Syria or Madagascar or the French (with British help) tried to take Dakar, Vichy became German allies did they? No, no they didn’t and even if your idea of a ‘Vichy’ was possible (which I dispute), the US would be making very clear that Spain needs to stay out of things if they want food….].

Of course, if this doesn’t come to pass, Mussolini is well aware of the importance of Gibraltar to Italy’s safety. He would be proud to tackle garrisoning Spain to protect Gibraltar. He would also be rewarded the right to loot Spain. [As said, Mussolini is proud yes, he’s a proud Italian and if you read anything about Mussolini, Italy and the build up to the war, Italian war aims, what Mussolini saw as Italy’s sphere of influence, then you would know this and you couldn’t make such statements. So what you are saying is that Mussolini would be proud to garrison Spain to protect a German held, owned and run Gibraltar? He has swapped British jailers for German ones. The right to loot Spain? For what exactly? Their massive oil reserves? Their food stocks? The Wolfram that is going to Germany? And again, ignoring any sense of reality for a second, you are suggesting that Italian troops (who proved inadequate to the task in Yugoslavia) would be given the job of occupying and subjugating the Spanish population… and they would best set about this by looting Spain first…..?]

Repair of the Spanish rail network continues regardless. [Erm…. okay so there’s even more Germans in the independent state of ‘Vichy’ Spain now? Not much of an independent state is it?]

Gibraltar is a tougher nut to crack, but, given the air power that the Germans can bring to bear, it can be practically isolated from resupply. The assaulting ground forces required are small by necessity: the available frontage is tiny! The rest of the invasion force can now be sent to the East. There is significant cost, but Gibraltar eventually falls. Allied access to the Western Mediterranean is now blocked. Now all the Axis need is Suez and the Med is an Axis lake.

North Africa:

Mussolini has been brought into the German plans for the Med, since he may be needed to garrison Spain. [….and how he would react would be interesting. Of course he would be thoroughly aghast at such a proposal. If he is brought into this prior to joining the war then it would possibly be enough for him to decide to stay out. This would be just the worst news. He is being sold “Mare Nostrum”… but with Germany holding both sets of keys instead of the British….. If he is brought in to the plan after he’s actually declared war on Britain and France, then he’s feeling pretty sick right now. He can’t stop the Germans obviously, but he can make it plain that Italy will have nothing to do with stabbing Spain in the back. He could ask for Italian occupation of Gibraltar, but Hitler isn’t that stupid (and we know how paranoid he was about his flanks) – and even if he was, as soon as the next Italian development unfolds he would grab Gibraltar back.]

Able to be enticed by German plans – as his participation in Barbarossa would later show - once informed of German plans to take Suez via Turkey, the Germans can convince him that a risky strike for the Pyramids from Libya is not a necessary (or even a good) idea. [Which of course Mussolini also thoroughly rejects, and frankly makes him sick to his stomach and wishes he could have been more like Franco and tried to stay out of the war. Italy got nothing from France, he is seeing the Germans encroach on his backyard in Spain. He makes plans to take Egypt as quickly as possible and without German help]. Furthermore, they can convince him that it’s in the Axis interest to sucker the British into a trap deep in Libya as Suez falls. He pulls his forces back deep into Libya to set the trap. This proceeds long before the British are ready for O’Connor’s Raid. The Italians slip out of their positions in Egypt in the night and are well on their way to safety. Continuous good use of land mines make pursuit by the British difficult, even though they are better motorized. Most likely, the Italians escape to better positions deep in Libya. But, if they don’t, they’re no worse off than they were historically. Rommel soon arrives, and the situation is secure. How deep do the British end up in Libya? Probably about as deep as historically. Possibly deeper. [This whole scenario can be discounted. As said, Mussolini NEEDS, never mind wants, to take Suez. The war has immediately developed in a really, really bad way – and he hasn’t even suffered a defeat yet! But that state of affairs will soon end and defeat is just around the corner.]

Meanwhile, the British pursue the historical actions in Greece and Syria (same historical circumstances), with the historical results. They are thrown out of Greece and Crete, and Vichy Syria disappears. [Why? If you believe Mussolini is so malleable, then he won’t have any troops to attack Greece – they will all be on occupation duty while looting Spain and cowering in downtown Libya as part of a trap for the British……]

When Turkey kicks off soon after, Rommel will be in good position to shred their positions in Libya and press them too hard to escape Libya as German forces bear down from Turkey. [Soon after? Again, suspending disbelief for a moment, you have the Germans attacking Spain in the height of summer and expect this to be over after a few weeks]. So when is soon after? And what do the Germans do about getting to Turkey?]

Now, Spain, Gibraltar and Suez are connected to Germany’s central rail net. [Ooohh is that like the Orient Express? I must say, it sounds like the Germans did a thoroughly professional job on the Spanish rail network. They have been busy little bees….] They need only position token forces in the area, assured that overwhelming force can be delivered by rail as soon as any one of them is threatened. [So if it’s so easy to reinforce everywhere at the drop of a hat why didn’t the Germans have token forces in France then? Weren’t the French part of this ‘Central Rail Net’?]

Turkey:

After Yugoslavia and Greece, a German army group is now on the Turkish border. [So not soon after then?] The Turks, having fought for centuries to hold on to their European holdings, can’t bear to part with them and have much of their force on the European side of the Straits (confirmed by SPI). They garrison the Bosporus and the Dardanelles, but don’t expect the Sea of Marmara to be vulnerable. And they don’t really expect any invasion by the Germans anyway. Old Allies from the First World War, they figure the Germans will want to wait till they are ready to join voluntarily.

[Apologies but at this point I rather gave up. The following comments are meant to be light-hearted and not a dig at you.

But the Germans, having nearly a year to plan the invasion, have secured river barges that can fit on rail cars and built trailers for them. They blitz to the European side of the Sea of Marmara. They then cross it via those barges to the Asian side (with the Luftwaffe assuring no Turkish air or naval interference). Perhaps some paratroops are used to make absolutely sure that crossing is a success. Once established, they rush divisions across, which spread out to isolate the defenses of the Dardanelles and the Bosporus. Everything on the European side of the Straits is now pocketed. They, being of poor quality, quickly wither. The huge force facing them soon overwhelms them. The Germans are now fully over the Straits and into Asiatic Turkey proper. The Turkish rail, same standard as most of Europe, is easy to repair.

The Turkish army, while about four times the size of the Spanish, is of no better quality: The Turks have spent the last 50 years surrendering their entire empire and the Turkish division that was sent to Korea, later, was a joke of a division. SPI depicts most of them as static. Having lost a large fraction of their force at the Straits, they are incapable of mounting a serious defense of the interior of Turkey, due to the huge breadth of the defense lines needed. [Whooah hold on, why don’t Turkey get a Vichy Turkey. France got one. Spain got one. Why can’t Turkey have one?]

While this is going on, Stalin is getting very nervous. He complains to Hitler. Perhaps he even makes noises about declaring war. Hitler mollifies him with another of his coups! He proposes that they split Turkey just like they did Poland! Adolf assures Joe that he is only invading Turkey to get to Suez. So, Russia can have everything east of Sivas. [Great – so Stalin is happy with that despite the fact that the one thing that he really cares about - the Straits - is in German hands?] Stalin, never intending to go to war with the Germans while they appear so powerful, thinks he’s the one that has pulled off the coup! [He certainly is a tricky trickster that Hitler isn’t he?] He’s gained territory in Turkey and Baku is now about 1400km from the Germans, instead of the 700km it would have been had he not acted. (Of course, it is still far less than the 2900km it was historically 😊).

With Soviet help, Turkey is quickly subdued (though the Germans have a full year to achieve that if necessary). Leaving an Italian garrison (perhaps augmented by Armenians and Kurds). [Those Italians get everywhere don’t they? The Germans need to be careful they are taking over the world!] And a small force on the (new) Soviet border, a huge force now barrels towards Suez. Trapped between the Africa Corps and this huge force, the British 8th Army can, at best, hope to escape to flee out of the Med; at worst, to be trapped and destroyed. Once Suez is captured, the work begins to ruin the canal [Like you do…… ] The RN, at best, fled before Suez was even in danger. [Ohhh I say – don’t tell Winnie] At worst, they are now trapped in the Axis lake, where they are doomed [Thank-you Private Frazer]. The RM can now deliver supplies to Suez or further into Syria via Athens to Damascus – bypassing Turkish rail lines. [Lol - and they could have headed into the Indian Ocean but some total moron in the German Army apparently ordered the Canal to be sabotaged!!]

Malta never even becomes an issue, and withers without supply till it surrenders. [No GC for Malta then, they will be devastated….]

Japan:

Barbarossa having not happened in 1941, the Japanese are very nervous about the Soviets (who trounced them at Nomonhan earlier) staring down their throats at them from Siberia. They don’t have the confidence to launch the invasion of French Indochina or the Rising Sun offensive. They sit on their hands and wait. No Pearl Harbor means no US in the war in 1941. [Oh.. that’s a shame isn’t it? Winnie was so counting on that too].

Even if this doesn’t happen, and the Japanese go ahead, Hitler, upon hearing of Pearl Harbor, decides NOT to declare war on the US since he hasn’t gotten to the Gates of Moscow at that time, and isn’t quite as cocksure as he was at that point historically. [Now that is genuinely funny. He was ‘cocksure’ enough to do it when he was in the suburbs of Moscow sure, but you are saying he wouldn’t be having taken Gibraltar and Suez, turned the Med into an Axis lake and evicted the British…..mmmmm] The US still doesn’t end up at war with Germany for another year [Well the isolationists will be throwing a party…..].

Russia:

Finally, in the summer of 1942, Barbarossa kicks off. But, this time, there is no war in North Africa. Rommel and his Africa Corps (plus quite a bit more from the Turkish operations) are actually in Turkey, heading for Baku (where he ultimately earns the sobriquet of “The Caucasus Fox”). [Let’s hope that naughty fox doesn’t repeat his mistakes in North Africa, ignore orders and outrun his logistics!].

Russia, having maintained a peacetime production schedule, is not much more powerful than they were at the summer of 1941. And they haven’t yet learned any lessons about the poor state of their forces. The Germans, meanwhile, have continued wartime production after a light year of combat. They’re even stronger than they had been in 1941. Plus, their offensive options are much greater, with the frontage in Turkey added to the Soviet defense needs, thinning those defenses out. The year of extra planning helps as well. Barbarossa proceeds even better than it did historically. Once Baku falls (and it will, along with plenty of other oil centers in the Caucasus), the Soviets are heavily impacted by the loss of oil and Germany is ultimately benefited by the addition of oil. The tipping point is reached and Leningrad, Moscow, Stalingrad, and Baku fall before the first-year ends. Russia is now fatally compromised. 1943 is just a mopping up operation as the front reaches the Urals. [Ooooh be afraid, be very afraid……]

US:

By the time the US can field forces in Europe in 1944, much of the German army is back from Russia and it’s too late. [Hahahahaha I bet the isolationists are feeling pretty bloody stupid right now………] The US must devote huge resources to much greater than historical ground forces to partly replace the, now missing, Russians. This will sink a lot of Naval Task Forces before they are even made: Japan will be able to hold out in the Pacific [Wow, that's a very bold comment indeed... How many ships do you think have to cancelled or not ordered to allow Japan to hold out in the Pacific?? – even remain a threat to Hawaii and the West Coast [I trust that was a tongue in cheek comment? I would have loved to see Japan try and invade Hawaii……]. While the US develops the Atom Bomb, the Germans continue to develop Sarin. Germany gets back to work on a very serious navy and air force. If the bomb is used (tough to do with the skies filled with Me-262’s), London gets Sarin (or New York gets it, if German rocket development is at that point). World War II morphs into a Cold War. [Well that’s not a very happy ending is it boys and girls?].




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 9:15:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
a) We have to remove hindsight. I can’t see how you can make a case for the Germans even thinking about what happens post France. France is not going to be a quick win, and indeed historically (and this is born out in the Hitler Directives) the limit of German thinking was to gain enough territory in the Low Countries and North Eastern France to enable then to take the war to Britain by air. Defeating France – let alone defeating France quickly – was not really thought about at this time.


To be fair, the Germans were thinking about what to do about Perfidious Albion even prior to Adolf's Directive 9. Both the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine had already produced studies, including one on how an invasion might be conducted but Directive 9 then put the focus firmly on "paralyzing Britain's economy through interrupting it at critical points". I don't see it as unreasonable during this period (Nov-Jan) for one of the planners to have contemplated "what if we can also get Spain to threaten or even go after Gibraltar?". If you want to interrupt British economic trade, that would certainly qualify as a critical point.

That said, had the Germans quietly approached the Spanish with that proposal at this time, I'd suggest all they would get in response is "I'm sorry, we are unavailable at the moment but if you leave your details, we will get back to you as soon as you are on the verge of a certain victory.".

Of course, this possibility only relates to early German thinking on Gibraltar. If on the other hand the planning was supposed to be for some German all-in-the-Med strategy, that wouldn't realistically be considered until probably June '40 for reasons you've already indicated dozens of pages ago.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 9:43:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Buckrock

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
a) We have to remove hindsight. I can’t see how you can make a case for the Germans even thinking about what happens post France. France is not going to be a quick win, and indeed historically (and this is born out in the Hitler Directives) the limit of German thinking was to gain enough territory in the Low Countries and North Eastern France to enable then to take the war to Britain by air. Defeating France – let alone defeating France quickly – was not really thought about at this time.


To be fair, the Germans were thinking about what to do about Perfidious Albion even prior to Adolf's Directive 9. Both the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine had already produced studies, including one on how an invasion might be conducted but Directive 9 then put the focus firmly on "paralyzing Britain's economy through interrupting it at critical points". I don't see it as unreasonable during this period (Nov-Jan) for one of the planners to have contemplated "what if we can also get Spain to threaten or even go after Gibraltar?". If you want to interrupt British economic trade, that would certainly qualify as a critical point.

That said, had the Germans quietly approached the Spanish with that proposal at this time, I'd suggest all they would get in response is "I'm sorry, we are unavailable at the moment but if you leave your details, we will get back to you as soon as you are on the verge of a certain victory.".

Of course, this possibility only relates to early German thinking on Gibraltar. If on the other hand the planning was supposed to be for some German all-in-the-Med strategy, that wouldn't realistically be considered until probably June '40 for reasons you've already indicated dozens of pages ago.

warspite1

My comments referred to post France i.e. the defeat of France. The bottom two sentences in my original quote refers to Directive No.9

I think this Directive probably gives the answer to what Hitler thought possible at the time and does not refer to defeat of the French, but a tactical victory that sees them take French territory along the coast. As said, that was the limit of their realistic thinking. I would not doubt the planners in the Luftwaffe and Kriegsmarine developed various plans.

Should the Army succeed in defeating the Anglo-French Armies in the field and in seizing and holding a sector of the coast opposite England, the task of the Navy and Air Force to carry the war to English industry becomes paramount.

The part underlined at the end of the sentence is also relevant here because Lemay has dismissed there being any sort of air war over England in the absence of Sea Lion. That clearly was not Hitler's vision.

I absolutely agree re the Spanish response, and is exactly to be expected for two reasons a) because at the time the Spanish were in deep doo doo post the Civil War as we all know, but b) more importantly is that at the same time that the caller from Berlin is growing frustrated with Spain's automated response, there is the small matter that France are still very much alive, in the war, and [no hindsight allowed] have a great big **** off army that would give the Spanish Army a bloody nose if the bulk of said army was trying to get overly familiar with the defences of Gib.

As the Germans made absolutely clear, the Spanish simply lacked the means to be able to take "The Rock" so it would have been something of a double whammy for Franco..... whoops....

Could they have thought to ask the question? Well, yes but the reason I would imagine they would not want to is because if anyone had the wit to understand the mess Spain was in, they would have realised that Spain getting involved pre the defeat of France was potentially a really bad thing. The issue being the Spanish and Portuguese Wolfram supplies that would then be threatened.





RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 10:52:07 AM)

Germany would not have the steel to rebuild the Spanish rail system, build all of these invasion barges, the steel to replace blown bridges, make the ammunition as well as build the armaments to take on the USSR.

Armenia is part of the USSR, there is no Kurdish state nor country. So there is no military for occupation duties.

Somebody needs to watch the movie "Gallipoli" as well as read about it. Kemal sent his men there to die to gain time. The land is not panzer country, the Turks were fighters, and they would fall back to Asia after extracting a heavy price. Their air force would have places to hide until reinforced by the British, they aircraft would not be lined up for the Germans to destroy. Turkey would allow the British to base bombers there to attack Polesti.

The Germans were also short of the chemicals to put into their artillery rounds to go "boom!"

The Germans were so short of fuel that they did not have enough to provide to France to get the milk from the dairy farms to the processing plants. Much of it spoilt or was spilt.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/10/2020 11:39:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Germany would not have the steel to rebuild the Spanish rail system

warspite1

Damn... that would have made a good film as well. Mord am Ze Orient Express

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

So there is no military for occupation duties.

warspite1

Pay attention RangerJoe. "Are you a top notch Fascist dictator? Are you struggling to find, quality, reliable, occupation troops for your recent conquests? Well don't worry, just call Benito on Rome 123456. He has thousands of troops available to meet all your conquest needs. No country too big or too hilly. So don't delay, call Benito today and banish those post-conquest admin blues".

[image]local://upfiles/28156/97A254DD00754BCCAFA6D4683B17827A.jpg[/image]
"Mama Mia, Look ata my boys. I maka them available for gooda price, yes"


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

The Germans were so short of fuel that they did not have enough to provide to France to get the milk from the dairy farms to the processing plants. Much of it spoilt or was spilt.

warspite1

Yes but you know what they say, there is no point crying over split milk... or something [sm=dizzy.gif]






Page: <<   < prev  42 43 [44] 45 46   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
1.5