RE: The question to ask about The Italians (Full Version)

All Forums >> [General] >> General Discussion



Message


RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 11:01:44 AM)

So unless Britain marshaled the forces, deployed them closer, had the ships packed with equipment in port just waiting, but the troops ashore someplace doing some light training but not straying to far from the port, then the Canary Islands were unlikely to be occupied by the Allies unless they were invited in. If they were invited in, and even if they were not, the Canary Islands would then be occupied by the Allies at some point. Then any Free Spanish forces would actually have Spanish territory to retreat to and/or have expatriates join them there.

Other than U-boats, there would be little to no Axis naval intervention until Gibraltar was taken. Then it might be the Italian Navy in the open Atlantic, leaving the middle Med area of operations to go to the Atlantic. I am sure that would really help the North Afrikan Italian operations!




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 2:13:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
So unless Britain marshaled the forces, deployed them closer, had the ships packed with equipment in port just waiting, but the troops ashore someplace doing some light training but not straying to far from the port.....


Once everything was finally organized (taking about two weeks), the force and associated shipping were to be put on a 7 day standby to await events, meaning they could arrive off the Canaries about 14 days after the decision was made to launch the operation. And yes, that allowed some training/rehearsals to be conducted. The operation was to be launched at a time allowing a night arrival in low or no moonlight to ensure the commando units making the initial landing had the maximum chance of surprise against the estimated 20000 man garrison along with the coastal batteries.

It was also estimated at the time that this 7 day standby posture could be maintained for about a month before the shipping and troops would need to be released for other commitments.




Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 2:22:36 PM)

I would like to inject a graphical element into this discussion (below).

I don't know if this has been mentioned in any of the previous 1380 posts...forgive me for not reading them all. [:D]
The Germans don't need to take Gibraltar. They only need to deny its use (i.e., the harbor) to the British. The Luftwaffe was very capable of doing that, if it had airbases within reach of the Rock.

[image]local://upfiles/34241/B2D4D3468C3C46CCACBE5EF14CEEA4D6.gif[/image]

[image]local://upfiles/34241/0C7FDA5675244181A16DFAD53140D266.jpg[/image]

[image]local://upfiles/34241/34D15E04074240E0A7A1DC7844E8F43B.jpg[/image]




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 2:50:49 PM)

Force H was expected to head for open water once the Germans crossed the Spanish border. It wasn't just the threat of a sudden aerial attack, there was also the three major Spanish coastal batteries along with smaller nearby field batteries that could become a major threat if the Spanish decided they were going to get blamed anyway for allowing German indiscretions.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 3:43:11 PM)

I can see a plan forming for a quick grab by the "neutral" Italians . . .




rico21 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/15/2020 4:56:20 PM)

Thanks Zorch![&o]
You give me an excellent what-if scenario suggest.




Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 2:36:50 AM)

Speaking of which...has it been discussed allowing the Luftwaffe to use Spanish bases without Spain declaring war on Britain? No land action, just closing the border, if it wasn't already closed.

Such an arrangement would let Franco save face by not declaring war. It wouldn't stop the British from cutting off food + oil, but might cut him some slack with the US and Latin America. Franco could say to them (sotto voce), "Look, I had no choice but to let the Luftwaffe use my airfields, but I kept Spain out of the war when Hitler wanted me to go all in". Not sure how far that rationalization would go.

Franco did send the Blue division to Russia without a declaration of war, but they were 'volunteers' retaliating for the Soviet 'volunteers' who fought in Spain. And the Germans would have to send aviation support and and airfield protection forces to Spain, plus ongoing supplies.

Also, El Caudillo could say to Winston, "Please don't cut off my food and oil or seize the Canary Islands. I only want Gibraltar. You can keep the rest of your colonies. I won't say a word about West Indies piracy, plundering my treasure fleets, and those bastards Drake and Anson. You really don't want me to send another Armada, do you?"

Um, what did you say was in those brownies I ate?




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 2:42:17 AM)

They must have been good brownies.

Stalin wanted the western Allies to invade Spain and take out Franco after Germany was defeated. The Spanish maquis even invaded Spain from France during the war but the other Allies did not support them. Franco was in a tough position but allowing the Luftwaffe in? Normandy need not have been done at all. The Spanish citizens might not have like the Allied troops there but they would have liked the food.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 3:12:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Speaking of which...has it been discussed allowing the Luftwaffe to use Spanish bases without Spain declaring war on Britain? No land action, just closing the border, if it wasn't already closed.

warspite1

Who does that help though? It doesn't get Spain Gibraltar (but does bring them a world of grief), it doesn't put Gibraltar permanently out of action (but does commit German aircraft to Spain) and it allows the Royal Navy to move back as soon as German aircraft are sent elsewhere. Take Gibraltar or don't. The German air force in World War II suffered from having too much to do with not enough aircraft. If the Germans aren't going to invade Gibraltar then they will need an air force in Spain permanently or the British will move back in - a la Malta.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Such an arrangement would let Franco save face by not declaring war.

warspite1

I can't really see how that wouldn't be the equivalent to declaring war.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

It wouldn't stop the British from cutting off food + oil

warspite1

Correct

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

"Look, I had no choice but to let the Luftwaffe use my airfields, but I kept Spain out of the war when Hitler wanted me to go all in". Not sure how far that rationalization would go.

warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Also, El Caudillo could say to Winston, "Please don't cut off my food and oil or seize the Canary Islands. I only want Gibraltar. You can keep the rest of your colonies".

warspite1

Well yes, I'm sure he could say that......

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

"You really don't want me to send another Armada, do you?"

warspite1

Sure send another one. The first one was fun.




Orm -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 4:45:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 5:23:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 5:38:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?
warspite1

My sincere apologies for not naming every single country. The clue was in the sentence (in bold).




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 5:47:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?
warspite1

My sincere apologies for not naming every single country. The clue was in the sentence (in bold).


I knew that but I as just being helpful to Orm.

But Spain also helped the Allies as well not to mention people fleeing Nazi Europe.




Orm -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 5:55:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?
warspite1

My sincere apologies for not naming every single country. The clue was in the sentence (in bold).


Yes, I understood that it was only an example. It just felt like all the examples were of actions that benefited Axis, and I just wanted to suggest that there were actions in the other direction as well. Should have written it better.

Edit: Is felt the right form? Or right word? [&:] [:D]




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/16/2020 8:04:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?
warspite1

My sincere apologies for not naming every single country. The clue was in the sentence (in bold).


Yes, I understood that it was only an example. It just felt like all the examples were of actions that benefited Axis, and I just wanted to suggest that there were actions in the other direction as well. Should have written it better.

Edit: Is felt the right form? Or right word? [&:] [:D]
warspite1

Because the subject was a country whose actions would have benefitted the Axis, it seemed logical to use examples of other countries whose actions benefitted the Axis. If you want to use other examples then no problem.




RangerJoe -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/17/2020 12:22:28 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe


quote:

ORIGINAL: Orm

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Except they haven't stayed out of the war. We all know there are grey areas in life - France and Syria, Sweden and German troop transit, Spain and U-boat safe haven for example. But allowing the Luftwaffe to base, and conduct operations against Gibraltar from sovereign Spanish territory? Not really the actions of a neutral.


Why not mention US pre-war in this list?


Or Ireland? What about Switzerland?
warspite1

My sincere apologies for not naming every single country. The clue was in the sentence (in bold).


Yes, I understood that it was only an example. It just felt like all the examples were of actions that benefited Axis, and I just wanted to suggest that there were actions in the other direction as well. Should have written it better.

Edit: Is felt the right form? Or right word? [&:] [:D]
warspite1

Because the subject was a country whose actions would have benefitted the Axis, it seemed logical to use examples of other countries whose actions benefitted the Axis. If you want to use other examples then no problem.



Yes, felt is the proper word in the proper context there as I understand English. Of course, in English, I would not want to be a swede . . . [;)]




Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/19/2020 10:26:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Speaking of which...has it been discussed allowing the Luftwaffe to use Spanish bases without Spain declaring war on Britain? No land action, just closing the border, if it wasn't already closed.

Such an arrangement would let Franco save face by not declaring war. It wouldn't stop the British from cutting off food + oil, but might cut him some slack with the US and Latin America. Franco could say to them (sotto voce), "Look, I had no choice but to let the Luftwaffe use my airfields, but I kept Spain out of the war when Hitler wanted me to go all in". Not sure how far that rationalization would go.

There was an similar scenario that British planners were considering by late 1940, where Spain protests but in lieu of a survivable alternative is forced to allow German entry, which leads to Gibraltar and Portugal (and possibly Tangiers) being taken before the Germans then withdraw from Spanish territory, relying on sea and air supply (not the band) from Italy and Occupied France to sustain the German forces left to defend these newly won areas while Britain and the US are left to assess any Spanish claims of still qualifying as a non-belligerent, especially now that there is no longer a German presence in her sovereign territories.

It might sound like the British planners were over-thinking things but that was their wartime role and they recognized the fact that Spain was somewhat trapped between a Rock and a hard place. They could also leave it to bodies like the War Cabinet and the Ministry of Economic Warfare to make the final judgement as to Spanish accountability over the matter.






Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/19/2020 3:45:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Buckrock

quote:

ORIGINAL: Zorch

Speaking of which...has it been discussed allowing the Luftwaffe to use Spanish bases without Spain declaring war on Britain? No land action, just closing the border, if it wasn't already closed.

Such an arrangement would let Franco save face by not declaring war. It wouldn't stop the British from cutting off food + oil, but might cut him some slack with the US and Latin America. Franco could say to them (sotto voce), "Look, I had no choice but to let the Luftwaffe use my airfields, but I kept Spain out of the war when Hitler wanted me to go all in". Not sure how far that rationalization would go.

There was an similar scenario that British planners were considering by late 1940, where Spain protests but in lieu of a survivable alternative is forced to allow German entry, which leads to Gibraltar and Portugal (and possibly Tangiers) being taken before the Germans then withdraw from Spanish territory, relying on sea and air supply (not the band) from Italy and Occupied France to sustain the German forces left to defend these newly won areas while Britain and the US are left to assess any Spanish claims of still qualifying as a non-belligerent, especially now that there is no longer a German presence in her sovereign territories.

It might sound like the British planners were over-thinking things but that was their wartime role and they recognized the fact that Spain was somewhat trapped between a Rock and a hard place. They could also leave it to bodies like the War Cabinet and the Ministry of Economic Warfare to make the final judgement as to Spanish accountability over the matter.



There was also Operation Tracer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tracer




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/23/2020 12:22:51 PM)

Almost finished Mussolini Unleashed. This has been such a good read and really brings home the true nature of the German/Italian relationship in the early years of the war (and of course the total basket case that was Commando Supremo). If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.





Buckrock -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/23/2020 1:05:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.

I'm sure the author of Mussolini Unleashed will be so grateful for a comparison like that.[:D]





rico21 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/23/2020 1:49:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Almost finished Mussolini Unleashed. This has been such a good read and really brings home the true nature of the German/Italian relationship in the early years of the war (and of course the total basket case that was Commando Supremo). If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.



and if we have found that this thread is more interesting than the book?[:D]




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/23/2020 3:09:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Buckrock

quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1
If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.

I'm sure the author of Mussolini Unleashed will be so grateful for a comparison like that.[:D]


warspite1

Correct - you can't buy that kind of publicity [:)]




Chickenboy -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 1:38:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Almost finished Mussolini Unleashed. This has been such a good read and really brings home the true nature of the German/Italian relationship in the early years of the war (and of course the total basket case that was Commando Supremo). If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.




Forgive me mate, but I've been away from the forum and certainly this thread for a time. Is this a serious positive book review of which you speak or is this an inside joke based upon the unread body of 1398 previous posts on this thread?




Zorch -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 8:58:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Almost finished Mussolini Unleashed. This has been such a good read and really brings home the true nature of the German/Italian relationship in the early years of the war (and of course the total basket case that was Commando Supremo). If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.




Forgive me mate, but I've been away from the forum and certainly this thread for a time. Is this a serious positive book review of which you speak or is this an inside joke based upon the unread body of 1398 previous posts on this thread?

+1 [:D]




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 9:11:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy


quote:

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Almost finished Mussolini Unleashed. This has been such a good read and really brings home the true nature of the German/Italian relationship in the early years of the war (and of course the total basket case that was Commando Supremo). If anyone has found this thread interesting I would thoroughly recommend buying this book.




Forgive me mate, but I've been away from the forum and certainly this thread for a time. Is this a serious positive book review of which you speak or is this an inside joke based upon the unread body of 1398 previous posts on this thread?
warspite1

Welcome back!

Yes, this is a serious comment on the book Mussolini Unleashed 1939-1941 (Knox)

The thread started off as an question of whether better equipment would have resulted in better Italian performance, and then morphed into a “staff study” that suggested a war winning strategy for Germany would have seen them postpone Barbarossa for a year and adopt a Med first strategy.

I suggested that anyone who found this thread of interest should read this book. The reason for that concerns one of the central components of this “staff study”. What was being put forward was that the Italian – German relationship was one of perfect harmony and total trust, in which the Italians were quite happy for the Germans to take the lead in the Mediterranean. The Italians were happy to play nothing more than a bit part role – the Italian army’s sole purpose was limited to conceding the whole of Cyrenaica and large parts of Tripolitania and merely defending Tripoli from British attack - while the Germans took Gibraltar (invading Spain in the process and creating a German puppet regime). The Italians were also equally happy that the Balkans came under the German sphere of influence, leading to a German invasion of Turkey and the Middle East and ultimately Suez. The “staff study” also claims that the Italians would be happy, post the fighting, for their army to be merely used for occupation duties in countries that they never defeated and/or no longer were even in Italy’s sphere of influence.

It was argued by a number of people that this was frankly absurd for any number of reasons, and this book makes clear that those arguments are fully supported by the facts. The “staff study” treats the Italians as mere puppets or extensions of Germany and suggests that Italy, Mussolini and the Italian military would have been happy to be treated in that way.

Simply put, it ignores real life. It ignores the personalities involved, it ignores the comments and actions of those involved – comments and actions that are superbly brought to life by Knox. We see periods of time in which Mussolini was actually hoping for a German defeat, and other times, hoping for at least a German reverse to give Italy time to win her own battles, we see Mussolini desperate for Italian victories, scared witless that the Germans and British (or at other times, the Germans and Soviets) would come to a deal. Importantly it also shows that Mussolini feared swapping the jailers at Gibraltar and Suez (the British) for another (the Germans).

Mussolini was in a horrible position of his own making – and he knew it. He didn’t like the Germans – or at least he certainly distrusted them, but he needed them if his dreams were to be realised. He hated being the junior member of an alliance in which Hitler never told him anything and presented him with ‘fait accompli’. He knew full well (and the defeat of France confirmed it) that Italy would need her own victories, failing which, Italy would simply be the lap dog, feeding off German scraps, a lap-dog that the “staff study” suggests they would have been happy with – but of course was something Mussolini wasn’t going to allow (at least until defeat after defeat made that inevitable).

But life isn’t simple (as if the above wasn’t complicated enough for Mussolini). He also had his subordinates going off and doing their own things. Again the book brings out just how often Ciano, Badoglio, Graziani and Cavagnari were either ignoring Mussolini or even actively working against him (often with good reason). About the only thing that united them was that they didn’t want the Germans encroaching in their preserve.

This, very readable book, is very useful as part of understanding why the war developed in the way it did post the fall of France.





Chickenboy -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 4:13:55 PM)

Useful summary. Thanks mate.

Did Mussolini's outlook on his relationship with Ze Germans change post Skorzeny rescue? That was pretty late in the game and, from what anecdotal references I've seen-he was already a 'beaten' man in many ways. But did this rescue and follow-on realpolitik change meaningfully?




rico21 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 4:23:13 PM)

http://www.sixtant.net/2011/artigos.php?cat=german-attempt-to-conquer-gibraltar&sub=gibraltar--the-rock&tag=operation-felix*




loki100 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/24/2020 5:04:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Useful summary. Thanks mate.

Did Mussolini's outlook on his relationship with Ze Germans change post Skorzeny rescue? That was pretty late in the game and, from what anecdotal references I've seen-he was already a 'beaten' man in many ways. But did this rescue and follow-on realpolitik change meaningfully?


don't think he had much choice then. The RSI was a classic German puppet regime, so not under their full control but close enough. Even if it had wanted to, it had nowhere to go. Italy had surrendered and the Germans wouldn't simply retreat and it lacked much normal armed forces apart from some very pro-Fascist elements.

The Allies by late 44 were negioting with figures in his regime to try and set up the basis for a transition of power to limit the risk that the partisan movement got control of a region (and possibly set off a Greek style revolt vs the Allies).

Its fiction but Carlo Lucarelli's Carte Blanche is really good on the internal dynamics of the final days. They were still trying to undermine each other for power, there was a vestige of a normal state but the one person no one was interested in was Mussolini




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/25/2020 5:21:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: loki100


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Useful summary. Thanks mate.

Did Mussolini's outlook on his relationship with Ze Germans change post Skorzeny rescue? That was pretty late in the game and, from what anecdotal references I've seen-he was already a 'beaten' man in many ways. But did this rescue and follow-on realpolitik change meaningfully?


don't think he had much choice then. The RSI was a classic German puppet regime, so not under their full control but close enough. Even if it had wanted to, it had nowhere to go. Italy had surrendered and the Germans wouldn't simply retreat and it lacked much normal armed forces apart from some very pro-Fascist elements.

The Allies by late 44 were negioting with figures in his regime to try and set up the basis for a transition of power to limit the risk that the partisan movement got control of a region (and possibly set off a Greek style revolt vs the Allies).

warspite1

Nothing to add to this really. Mussolini was an irrelevance by then.




warspite1 -> RE: The question to ask about The Italians (10/26/2020 2:02:07 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: UP844


quote:

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

Here is an interesting read:

the wages of destruction

https://www.bing.com/search?q=the+wages+of+destruction+pdf&FORM=QSRE8

Full text of "Tooze, Adam The Wages Of Destruction The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy"

https://archive.org/stream/ToozeAdamTheWagesOfDestructionTheMakingAndBreakingOfTheNaziEconomy/Tooze%2C%20Adam%20-%20The%20Wages%20of%20Destruction%20The%20Making%20and%20Breaking%20of%20the%20Nazi%20Economy_djvu.txt


Thanks for reporting this book!! [&o]
warspite1

So what is your take on the introduction? Is Tooze blaming the US (at least initially) for the start of Germany's problems? Is he suggesting Britain was to blame for moving off the Gold Standard? What I don't get a sense of here is why countries took the action they did - but moreover, what they could have done differently.




Page: <<   < prev  44 45 46 [47] 48   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
0.9375