Matrix Games Forums

 Forums  Register  Login  Photo Gallery  Member List  Search  Calendars  FAQ 

My Profile  Inbox  Address Book  My Subscription  My Forums  Log Out

RE: Mar 18, 1942

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 18, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Mar 18, 1942 - 10/3/2021 11:56:30 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 18, 1942

A small CV TF attacked my SCTF at Tulagi
Morning Air attack on TF, near Tulagi at 114,137

Weather in hex: Light rain

Raid detected at 38 NM, estimated altitude 17,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 14 minutes

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 36
D3A1 Val x 24

Japanese aircraft losses
D3A1 Val: 4 damaged

Allied Ships
CL Achilles, Bomb hits 2, on fire
CL Leander, Bomb hits 1, on fire
Time to run South a max speed.

I have another SCTF that will try to engage, you never know.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 151
RE: Mar 19, 1942 - 10/4/2021 3:05:30 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 19, 1942

This is why you keep you fleet subs out trying:
ASW attack near Muntok at 49,89

Japanese Ships
DMS W-17, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
DMS W-18

Allied Ships
SS Seal
=================================
To bad he also had success
Submarine attack near Niue at 146,165

Japanese Ships
SS I-10

Allied Ships
xAK Sea Hound, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
===========================================
My SCTF that tried to intercept his small CVTF did not find anything.
But that TF is now low on fuel and will have to return to OZ to refuel.

My two CLs that were bombed have gotten away and will move to Auckland for repairs.

< Message edited by Nomad -- 10/4/2021 3:52:18 AM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 152
RE: Mar 20, 1942 - 10/4/2021 4:14:06 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 20, 1942
Payback:
Submarine attack near Niue at 146,165

Japanese Ships
SS I-10, hits 19, and is sunk

Allied Ships
DD Aylwin
DD Dale
DD Worden

SS I-10 is located by DD Aylwin
I-10 diving deep ....
DD Dale attacking submerged sub ....
SS I-10 forced to surface!
DD Dale firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Worden firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Aylwin firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Dale firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Worden firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Aylwin firing on surfaced sub ....
DD Worden firing on surfaced sub ....
Sub slips beneath the waves
================================


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 153
RE: Mar 21, 1942 - 10/4/2021 7:44:55 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 21, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 154
RE: Mar 22, 1942 - 10/4/2021 10:45:31 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 22, 1942

No much to report, it is a bit interesting that he took the island of Beru
instead of Tabiteuea.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 155
RE: Mar 23, 1942 - 10/5/2021 2:05:26 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 23, 1942

Amphib landing at Ambon.

Amphib landing at Nikunau in the Gilberts.


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 156
RE: Mar 24, 1942 - 10/5/2021 5:09:05 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 24, 1942

Missed, drat:
Sub attack near Obi at 77,107

Japanese Ships
CVE Hosho
BB Haruna
BB Kongo
CA Nachi
CA Haguro
CA Myoko
DD Hibiki
DD Yugumo
DD Sazanami
DD Akebono
DD Oboro

Allied Ships
SS Salmon

SS Salmon launches 4 torpedoes at CVE Hosho
===========================================
He is eating up islands in the Pacific:
Landings at Arorae, Baker Island, and Tabiteuea in the Gilberts

I assume that with the amphibious bonus running out he is trying to
get as many as he can.
==============================================
Shock attack at Ambon and my guys held!
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 3845 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 153

Defending force 2654 troops, 23 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 68

Japanese adjusted assault: 101

Allied adjusted defense: 67

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), forts(+), op mode(-), leaders(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
246 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
265 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 20 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 2 (1 destroyed, 1 disabled)

Assaulting units:
Yokosuka 2nd SNLF
Yokosuka Assault SNLF

Defending units:
Molukken Garrison Battalion
4th Coastal Gun Battalion
Ambon Base Force

==========================================


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 157
RE: Mar 25, 1942 - 10/5/2021 8:56:25 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 25, 1942

Another shock attack at Ambon
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 3664 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 132

Defending force 2285 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 42

Japanese adjusted assault: 38

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), disruption(-)
morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
45 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
62 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 16 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
=============================================
That was after a naval bombardment
Night Naval bombardment of Ambon at 76,109 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!

7 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.

Japanese Ships
CA Chokai
CA Takao
DD Umikaze
DD Oyashio
DD Kuroshio

Allied ground losses:
243 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 21 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 5 (2 destroyed, 3 disabled)

Airbase hits 10
Airbase supply hits 2
Runway hits 15
Port hits 16
=============================================
A miss:
Sub vs Sub: SS Tarpon attacking SS I-162 at 64,99 - near Balikpapan

Japanese Ships
SS I-162

Allied Ships
SS Tarpon

SS Tarpon launches 2 torpedoes at 3,000 yards
================================================
I wonder why he has not moved this unit to a useful location.
1st Raiding Regiment is located at Kagoshima(102,60).

and it looks like he has left one of his best regiments in Korea:
II./90th Infantry Battalion is located at Rashin(110,46).

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 158
RE: Mar 26, 1942 - 10/6/2021 12:08:38 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 26, 1942
He has moved further South in the mid Pacific.
Landings at Nanumea and Vaitupu and it looks like there is
a TF about to land troops at Funafuti.
=====================================
Shock attack at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 54279 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1635

Defending force 24766 troops, 111 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 337

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 2029

Allied adjusted defense: 1846

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 1

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
1612 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 109 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 22 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1079 casualties reported
Squads: 85 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 28 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Guns lost 24 (2 destroyed, 22 disabled)
==================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 159
RE: Mar 27, 1942 - 10/6/2021 11:47:05 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 27, 1942

As expected, a landing and attack at Funafuti.

Shock attack at Wenchow:
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 53276 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1527

Defending force 23663 troops, 109 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 282

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 1015

Allied adjusted defense: 745

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
825 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 39 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled

Allied ground losses:
889 casualties reported
Squads: 107 destroyed, 14 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 15 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 8 (5 destroyed, 3 disabled)
===============================================
Landings at Babo and Boela - I had some mines at Boela but he didn't hit any


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 160
RE: Mar 28, 1942 - 10/7/2021 1:50:25 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 28, 1942

Wacked a PB

ASW attack near Singkep at 50,88

Japanese Ships
PB Kantori Maru, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
PB Hakozake Maru

Allied Ships
SS Truant
==============================================
Another shock attack at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 52710 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1446

Defending force 22853 troops, 105 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 266

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 756

Allied adjusted defense: 649

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
2425 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 182 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 26 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 25 disabled

Allied ground losses:
423 casualties reported
Squads: 59 destroyed, 14 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 27 disabled
Engineers: 8 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 13 (12 destroyed, 1 disabled)
====================================================
And a DA at Ambon
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3851 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 152

Defending force 2215 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 31

Japanese adjusted assault: 29

Allied adjusted defense: 46

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
46 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
61 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 161
RE: Mar 29, 1942 - 10/7/2021 1:43:40 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 29, 1942

Shock attack at Wenchow again:
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 51000 troops, 504 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1269

Defending force 22137 troops, 94 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 256

Japanese adjusted assault: 678

Allied adjusted defense: 703

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
516 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1007 casualties reported
Squads: 54 destroyed, 9 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 38 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 10 disabled
Guns lost 19 (11 destroyed, 8 disabled)
=========================================================
And at Ambon
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3807 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 147

Defending force 2115 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 23

Japanese adjusted assault: 13

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: leaders(-)

Japanese ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
285 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 8 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
==================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 162
RE: Mar 30, 1942 - 10/7/2021 5:15:28 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 30, 1942

Well, the Brit subs are doing good

Submarine attack near Singapore at 50,84

Japanese Ships
xAKL Akita Maru, Shell hits 3, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Trusty

Japanese ground losses:
7 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

xAKL Akita Maru is sighted by SS Trusty
SS Trusty attacking xAKL Akita Maru on the surface

I heard sinking sounds after the combat and it showed up on the sunk ship list


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 163
RE: Mar 31, 1942 - 10/7/2021 8:35:06 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Mar 31, 1942

Last day of the amphibious bonus, yeah.

Ambon falls
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 3837 troops, 43 guns, 2 vehicles, Assault Value = 151

Defending force 1923 troops, 20 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 15

Japanese adjusted assault: 87

Allied adjusted defense: 22

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Ambon !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), morale(-), experience(-)
Attacker: fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Allied ground losses:
1020 casualties reported
Squads: 32 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 189 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 13 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 26 (26 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 3
=============================================

DA at Batavia:
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 34990 troops, 366 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 1208

Defending force 18738 troops, 173 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 506

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 2

Japanese adjusted assault: 875

Allied adjusted defense: 395

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 2)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 2

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
931 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 109 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 21 disabled

Allied ground losses:
751 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 81 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
5th Amphibious Brigade
6th Guards Division
2nd Recon Regiment
4th Division
14th Guards Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment

Defending units:
Batavia Coastal Gun Battalion
2nd KNIL Regiment
1st Regt Cavalerie
4th KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Landstorm Battalion
1st KNIL Regiment
Roodenburg Battalion
1st KNIL AA Battalion
Merak Base Force
ML-KNIL
KNIL Army Command
ABDA
Batavia Base Force

=============================================
Landings at Dobo and Taberfane

And since the turn I am working on is 1 April, 1942
there are a huge number of ships waiting for upgrades this next turn.


< Message edited by Nomad -- 10/7/2021 8:37:53 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 164
RE: Apr 1, 1942 - 10/8/2021 4:20:25 AM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 1, 1942

A SA at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 33337 troops, 368 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 1033

Defending force 18034 troops, 173 guns, 80 vehicles, Assault Value = 410

Japanese adjusted assault: 291

Allied adjusted defense: 579

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), fatigue(-)

Japanese ground losses:
1028 casualties reported
Squads: 9 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 9 (2 destroyed, 7 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
1224 casualties reported
Squads: 54 destroyed, 83 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Guns lost 16 (2 destroyed, 14 disabled)
Vehicles lost 8 (1 destroyed, 7 disabled)

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 165
RE: Apr 2, 1942 - 10/8/2021 4:03:14 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 2, 1942

A DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52976 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1343

Defending force 21806 troops, 84 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 267

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 957

Allied adjusted defense: 625

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
569 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 46 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)
Vehicles lost 23 (4 destroyed, 19 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
970 casualties reported
Squads: 42 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 63 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 11 disabled
Guns lost 14 (1 destroyed, 13 disabled)
================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 166
RE: Apr 3, 1942 - 10/8/2021 8:08:04 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 3, 1942

A DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52618 troops, 507 guns, 313 vehicles, Assault Value = 1295

Defending force 21002 troops, 83 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 231

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 749

Allied adjusted defense: 610

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
597 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 9 disabled

Allied ground losses:
819 casualties reported
Squads: 21 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 63 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 11 (7 destroyed, 4 disabled)
The defenders are getting a bit thin.
=================================================
A Da at Batavia

Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 30259 troops, 327 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 995

Defending force 17170 troops, 171 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 346

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 1

Japanese adjusted assault: 505

Allied adjusted defense: 877

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), leaders(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1042 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 82 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled

Allied ground losses:
674 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 54 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 17 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Guns lost 22 (1 destroyed, 21 disabled)
=====================================================
A landing at Lautem on Timor

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 167
RE: Apr 4, 1942 - 10/9/2021 9:36:34 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 4, 1942

another DA at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52390 troops, 507 guns, 314 vehicles, Assault Value = 1271

Defending force 20402 troops, 78 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 209

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 671

Allied adjusted defense: 772

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
694 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 51 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 14 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 46 (1 destroyed, 45 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
825 casualties reported
Squads: 30 destroyed, 26 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Engineers: 9 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 8 (3 destroyed, 5 disabled)
=================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 168
RE: Apr 5, 1942 - 10/9/2021 9:38:06 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 5, 1942

Love those British subs
Sub vs Sub: SS Trusty attacking SS I-156 at 52,84 - near Tioman Island

Japanese Ships
SS I-156, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage

Allied Ships
SS Trusty

SS Trusty launches 6 torpedoes at 3,000 yards
===================================================



(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 169
RE: Apr 6, 1942 - 10/10/2021 4:00:46 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 6, 1942

A DA at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 52256 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1248

Defending force 19806 troops, 73 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 186

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 887

Allied adjusted defense: 706

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
565 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Guns lost 5 (1 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
747 casualties reported
Squads: 28 destroyed, 37 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 47 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Guns lost 7 (4 destroyed, 3 disabled)
======================================================
and a DA at Batavia
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 28564 troops, 328 guns, 47 vehicles, Assault Value = 840

Defending force 16073 troops, 169 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 238

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 151

Allied adjusted defense: 419

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 0)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
758 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 104 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 6 disabled

Allied ground losses:
620 casualties reported
Squads: 51 destroyed, 4 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 29 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
====================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 170
RE: Apr 7, 1942 - 10/10/2021 8:11:02 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 7, 1942

A DA at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 51963 troops, 507 guns, 315 vehicles, Assault Value = 1214

Defending force 19111 troops, 70 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 150

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 576

Allied adjusted defense: 328

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
385 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (1 destroyed, 5 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
886 casualties reported
Squads: 12 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 3 destroyed, 76 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 3 (3 destroyed, 0 disabled)

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 171
RE: Apr 8, 1942 - 10/11/2021 4:36:29 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 8, 1942

A Shock Attack at Wenchow

Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 51541 troops, 507 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1197

Defending force 18506 troops, 66 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 130

Japanese adjusted assault: 1025

Allied adjusted defense: 928

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+)

Japanese ground losses:
1357 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 41 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 40 disabled
Engineers: 75 destroyed, 9 disabled
Guns lost 7 (3 destroyed, 4 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
413 casualties reported
Squads: 24 destroyed, 11 disabled
Non Combat: 15 destroyed, 62 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 4 disabled
Guns lost 4 (2 destroyed, 2 disabled)
============================================
Troops land at Port Blair

BTW, this is the view out my front door right now





Attachment (1)

< Message edited by Nomad -- 10/11/2021 5:55:48 PM >

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 172
RE: Apr 9, 1942 - 10/11/2021 9:43:26 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 9, 1942

Shock attack at Wenchow
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 50584 troops, 505 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1132

Defending force 17906 troops, 63 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 121

Japanese adjusted assault: 636

Allied adjusted defense: 361

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 1)

Japanese Assault reduces fortifications to 0

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
404 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled

Allied ground losses:
801 casualties reported
Squads: 39 destroyed, 30 disabled
Non Combat: 11 destroyed, 68 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 3 disabled
Guns lost 14 (13 destroyed, 1 disabled)
==================================================
A DA at Batavia
Ground combat at Batavia (49,98)

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 17764 troops, 212 guns, 89 vehicles, Assault Value = 810

Defending force 15915 troops, 169 guns, 79 vehicles, Assault Value = 249

Japanese adjusted assault: 121

Allied adjusted defense: 387

Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3 (fort level 1)

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
1003 casualties reported
Squads: 8 destroyed, 73 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 12 disabled

Allied ground losses:
288 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 15 disabled
Non Combat: 6 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 6 (3 destroyed, 3 disabled)
==================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 173
More snow - 10/11/2021 11:40:22 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Now we are getting some snow;





Attachment (1)

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 174
Apr 10, 1042 - 10/11/2021 11:54:44 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 10, 1942

Wenchow finally falls
Ground combat at Wenchow (89,58)

Japanese Shock attack

Attacking force 50424 troops, 505 guns, 283 vehicles, Assault Value = 1112

Defending force 17107 troops, 52 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 91

Japanese engineers reduce fortifications to 0

Japanese adjusted assault: 680

Allied adjusted defense: 274

Japanese assault odds: 2 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Wenchow !!!

Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker: shock(+), disruption(-)

Japanese ground losses:
277 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 9 disabled

Allied ground losses:
24291 casualties reported
Squads: 527 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 1663 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 56 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 45 (45 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 8
================================================

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 175
RE: Apr 11, 1042 - 10/12/2021 4:19:14 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 176
RE: Apr 11, 1042 - 10/12/2021 5:02:12 PM   
Mark VII


Posts: 1838
Joined: 8/11/2003
From: Brentwood,TN
Status: offline 		With your 14 feet of average snow I doubt that it ever totally melts in West Yellowstone?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.



_____________________________


(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 177
RE: Apr 11, 1042 - 10/12/2021 5:09:04 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Mark VII

With your 14 feet of average snow I doubt that it ever totally melts in West Yellowstone?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Apr 11, 1942

Nothing exciting to talk about.

The snow is melting.




Generally speaking, snow that falls after Halloween will be here until the next May. This snow may or may not melt. Some that is in shade may be here next Spring.

(in reply to Mark VII)
Post #: 178
RE: More snow - 10/12/2021 5:43:35 PM   
BBfanboy


Posts: 18046
Joined: 8/4/2010
From: Winnipeg, MB
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Now we are getting some snow;





Yeah, a couple of days ago the province of Alberta, just north of you, also got snow. Hazards of living alongside the Rockies which make cold air slide along their flank instead of passing over.

_____________________________

No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth

(in reply to Nomad)
Post #: 179
Apr 12, 1942 - 10/12/2021 7:58:22 PM   
Nomad


Posts: 5905
Joined: 9/5/2001
From: West Yellowstone, Montana
Status: offline 		Apr 12, 1942

Nothing of interest to talk about in the game.

West Yellowstone basically is surrounded by mountains, so it gets a lot of snow and cold temperatures.

(in reply to BBfanboy)
Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition >> After Action Reports >> RE: Mar 18, 1942 Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI

1.438