RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [New Releases from Matrix Games] >> Advanced Tactics Series >> Mods and Scenarios



Message

rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 3:31:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: IRONCROM

 Tom is working on a another version of "Age Of Napoleon" that will probable not be out for another week.

Star Drek is still going through testing. Going off of some of the comments on the forum I'm guessing bulldog may make some changes before there through.
Which leaves the "War for Eldorado"
I'll contact the designer and see if he is interested in doing some play testing with me. Is anyone interested in joining a game?(Bulldog, Rick)




Sure I can join in a game of El Dorado.

Rick



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 4:49:01 AM)

 The designer has agreed to play test with us.

I just played out about 5 turns against AI and I don't think were going to find any problems with this one. There are no special graphics or action cards. (none of the usual bug causes)





rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 10:49:08 AM)


After exchanging emails with TWebber, I put the zip for WaW_v32 together. One of you might want to double check to make sure I didn't make a mistake.

After that I'm fine with approving WaWv32. I've put it in the "waiting for approval" pool at the community site.

Rick



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 1:00:39 PM)

I'm happy to approve it, Fogg has also posted to say it downloaded fine.



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 7:42:56 PM)

Vic,

I was going throught the sandbox list on the community site and realize that they're all marked as approved - YES.

I suspect that was done when you re-organized and I just hadn't noticed. Should we change that - actually the way you have it set up now, I'm not sure that column is even needed.

If you want I can go in and change entries to NO for the Sandbox.

Rick



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 7:45:03 PM)

Bulldog,

Go ahead and approve it then. IRONCROM was satisfied with it earlier.

Rick





alaric318 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 8:00:09 PM)

thanks for all the support on the scenarios in the sandbox, thanks for the time on it, thanks Vic for a clean and clear game system/engine and thanks Tom Weber for all, "worth-playing" scenarios that have make available,

best regards,

Murat30.



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/21/2008 10:04:18 PM)

Okay, WAW v32 approved. My first approval [:)].



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/24/2008 4:38:40 AM)



Murat30,

I've just about got this taken care of. Got rid of the crash to desktop, but need to fix up the event card and the event. I'll have the event card add swedish navy to stockholm.

I'll also flag scenario as human only. And I'll edit the narrative to remove warning about the peace option.

I'll let you know before I upload the revised one. And I'll upload it to the sandbox for folks to test.

Rick



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/24/2008 2:16:27 PM)

Delyn needs some help with his Lords of the Realm scenario. I will check it out. Bulldog



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/25/2008 12:06:00 AM)

 Hi Guys.

I'm totally satisfied with Knight's scenario. They don't get more stable than that.

My vote is to approve...

Rick if your good with the scenario we don't need to continue. I know you got a lot of things going on.
I'm just playing for fun now.[:D]... Come to think of it I'm always just playing for fun.[sm=00000436.gif]

How about you Bull? Have you had a chance to look at it yet?



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/25/2008 1:17:48 AM)



I agree I think it looks solid. Approve whenever youre confortable. I'm fine to continue the game unless you would rather not.

I'm hoping to finish up Murat30's Diplomacy Napolean sometime today. I'd like you guys to to take a look after I finish. (I'll change version number in sandbox). I'll let you know when I upload it.

Rick



alaric318 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/25/2008 7:17:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Rick



Murat30,

I've just about got this taken care of. Got rid of the crash to desktop, but need to fix up the event card and the event. I'll have the event card add swedish navy to stockholm.

I'll also flag scenario as human only. And I'll edit the narrative to remove warning about the peace option.

I'll let you know before I upload the revised one. And I'll upload it to the sandbox for folks to test.

Rick



thanks for all support on the scenario, is for me a privilege to have people as you on board, think that can speak about all people around, hope that people like the scenario and play it and enjoy, last days i do not have get much time "free" and have been consuming time on other things, anyway i do not success or achieve to fix the error by myself, thanks both for update the info on the scenario and for fix it,

with best regards,

murat30.



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/25/2008 4:35:46 PM)

The War for Eldorado by Iron Knight is a nicely balanced scenario and one which I may like to spend more time on in the future.

I have no objections to you approving as per your comments above.

Thanks.

Bulldog



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/27/2008 7:53:35 AM)

I've just uploaded the final version of the Salerno VI Corp (v12)to the Waiting for Approval Area on the community site. Made very minor changes, added and truck to American Divisional Artillery and made a few addtional notes in the briefing.

Bulldog and Ironcrom, I'll let you two check this one out and approve if you don't mind.

Rick



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/27/2008 6:41:50 PM)

No problem Rick. I have been anxiously awaiting your new version.[:D]



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/28/2008 4:11:34 PM)

I will check this out tonight...



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/28/2008 10:37:17 PM)

I have been playing the Salerno scenario till I won as Germany against AI+1. I like the way the map has the valleys surrounded by hills to create the only corridors that the allies can come down. An unusual but effective thing I noticed was having lots of small German units. Usually I have units of around 40 rifles and accompanying support units but the small units usually of only 15 rifles and support was nice and it allowed a lot of flexibility in deploying the troops to stop the americans spreading out from the beach. Nice events to reinforce HQ and bring in more units. I did not notice any bugs in the game which went smoothly till the end. If I did have to gripe about something it was that it was a bit short, but perhaps the battle was short (don't know much about that particular battle), also the engineers numbered only 10 per unit and the turns were not long enough to get them to reach 150 points to build a fortification so I am not sure of their usefulness? I have no objections to approving this scenario, its a nice little game if you are short on time, quite enjoyed it.   



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/28/2008 10:43:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BULLDOGINTHEUK

I have been playing the Salerno scenario till I won as Germany against AI+1. I like the way the map has the valleys surrounded by hills to create the only corridors that the allies can come down. An unusual but effective thing I noticed was having lots of small German units. Usually I have units of around 40 rifles and accompanying support units but the small units usually of only 15 rifles and support was nice and it allowed a lot of flexibility in deploying the troops to stop the americans spreading out from the beach. Nice events to reinforce HQ and bring in more units. I did not notice any bugs in the game which went smoothly till the end. If I did have one thing to gripe about was that it was a bit short, but perhaps the battle was short (don't know much about that particular battle).  I have no objections to approving this scenario, its a nice little game if you are short on time.   



Bulldog, thanks for comments. And yes, the actual battle was short. In fact I might have tacked on a couple of extra days in my "interpretation" just to lengthen it out. I was actually looking to build a short quick battle that could be used to lure in some folks who wanted more "historical" scenarios. (And I was also learning the editor - so it worked for me)

Thnks,
Rick



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/29/2008 7:22:53 AM)

 Alright, I had a chance to check out Salerno again and as before it looks good to go.

My vote is for approval.

P.S. thanx for adding the extra trucks to the latter round allied artillery Rick.[;)]



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/29/2008 8:03:52 AM)

@Bulldog

How's your star drek testing going?

I haven't really given it a good look yet. I was waiting to give you some time in case you need to make some changes first.



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/29/2008 12:56:46 PM)

I am going to put the Trek Mod in Sandbox for now as we have a problem with Womulan PP an supply on turn 1. It is not a game killer but needs fixing.



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (3/29/2008 6:15:02 PM)

Vic helped me with the problem I was having with the Trek Mod (as usual it was a simple error) and I have now posted version 1.3 on the AT community site.  It is ready for your critical eyes now for approval if you all feel its okay. Let me know.  Thanks



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/1/2008 4:06:54 AM)

Bulldog,

I'll check this out later tonight.

Rick



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/1/2008 10:36:56 PM)

Make sure you download the new 1.4 version as otherwise the research will not work. Thanks.



Barthheart -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/2/2008 3:59:33 PM)

Guys,

Can I suggest that you request/require people to put the version number of their mod in the filename AND in the scenario briefing. Makes it easier for all to know which version is being played.

My $0.02



rickier65 -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/2/2008 7:50:09 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Barthheart

Guys,

Can I suggest that you request/require people to put the version number of their mod in the filename AND in the scenario briefing. Makes it easier for all to know which version is being played.

My $0.02


Thats a excellent idea!

Rick



BULLDOGINTHEUK -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/2/2008 10:02:59 PM)

Alreadt tried this. I tried calling the filename StarDrek1.20 etc but it would not upload for some strange reason. Could be the full stop? or perhaps it only accepts words, not numbers?



Barthheart -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/2/2008 10:04:35 PM)

It's the full stop. Use underscore ie StarDrek_v1_2.pt2 or whole numbers only ie StarDrek_v12.pt2.



IRONCROM -> RE: Scenario Approval Discussion - WaW3.2 (4/2/2008 11:46:23 PM)

Learn something new everyday.[:D]



Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.5 ANSI
2.71875